psychoslice
Veteran Member
Yes as I said, someone has to pay.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
The government that's paying for it is the same government that you believe to be part of the conspiracy covering up that vaccines cause harm, presumably?Believe me someone is paying from it.
That is not correct. Vaccines work. India has been able to eradicate Small Pox and Polio. We are now concentrating on Tuberculosis.They're lying to us so that they can use up their health budget on something they know doesn't work?
This article from Slate (entitled "Conspiracy Theorists Aren't Really Skeptics") suggests that conspiracy theorists don't actually analyze the positions they accept. Rather, they blindly accept them on the grounds that they're contrary to the mainstream. Meanwhile, they think of themselves as good skeptics for daring to go against the mainstream, even though the stuff they're saying doesn't hold up to even the slightest analysis. Often they'll believe mutually contradictory things, as long as they all contradict the mainstream view.How is it possible to keep thinking this sort of mindless drivel?
"Conspiracy believers are the ultimate motivated skeptics. Their curse is that they apply this selective scrutiny not to the left or right, but to the mainstream. They tell themselves that they’re the ones who see the lies, and the rest of us are sheep. But believing that everybody’s lying is just another kind of gullibility."
Or to use internet terminology, they're Edgelords.This article from Slate (entitled "Conspiracy Theorists Aren't Really Skeptics") suggests that conspiracy theorists don't actually analyze the positions they accept. Rather, they blindly accept them on the grounds that they're contrary to the mainstream. Meanwhile, they think of themselves as good skeptics for daring to go against the mainstream, even though the stuff they're saying doesn't hold up to even the slightest analysis. Often they'll believe mutually contradictory things, as long as they all contradict the mainstream view.
In fact they're just contrarian, out of a generalized sense of alienation, which leads them to believe that anything that most people believe must be wrong.
Yes as I said, someone has to pay.
Why not try explaining that instead of just making a claim and standing back?Doesn't mean its right, have you read about how expensive the vaccines are to the poorer countries ?, someone is paying
Exactly. What??The government that's paying for it is the same government that you believe to be part of the conspiracy covering up that vaccines cause harm, presumably?
They're lying to us so that they can use up their health budget on something they know doesn't work????
How is it possible to keep thinking this sort of mindless drivel?
India Holds Bill Gates Accountable For His Vaccine CrimesThat is not correct. Vaccines work. India has been able to eradicate Small Pox and Polio. We are now concentrating on Tuberculosis.
I'm going to point out something very specific about this source. Take a look at its sources. None of them seem to be credible. And if you look, they cannot tell the difference between fraud and real. "Oxford Dictionaries" looks impressive, but it is not the real thing, which is oed.com. Pharmabiz.com does not appear to be a credible site. Holyhormones?India Holds Bill Gates Accountable For His Vaccine Crimes
India Holds Bill Gates Accountable For His Vaccine Crimes
Well as an aspiring virologist I will like to fill you in my lady. First off in the U.S and most of Europe vaccines have not contained aborted feces cells sense the 70's. Now however many third world countries and developing countries still have vaccines with this in them. Second I believe that everyone should be vaccinated regardless of religion. I ask anyone here to give me a reason not too because I guaranty it's wrong. No there no mercury in vaccies that was a 50's thing, no there's nothing in a vaccine that harms the body. And a hell no it does not cause autism there is no study ever that suggests that, it's a wife's tale.Hi everyone,
it's recently come to my attention that a number of common vaccinations contain cells from aborted fetuses. But I'm also aware that most people, including religious people, get vaccinated. I have a Christin friend who is a Pharmacist and who is anti-vax specifically because of this ingredient. But how common is it for religious people who are against abortion to get themselves and their children vaccinated?
Are you one of these people or are you a religious person who avoids vaccination for religious reasons?
You are joking, right?India Holds Bill Gates Accountable For His Vaccine Crimes
India Holds Bill Gates Accountable For His Vaccine Crimes
Sorry if you thiought that sentence meant exactly as it read - It was intended to be an expression of incredulity at somebody actually appearing to think that this might be the case.That is not correct. Vaccines work. India has been able to eradicate Small Pox and Polio. We are now concentrating on Tuberculosis.
The thing is we cannot go by those who we believe should know, for they are the ones who are behind the whole shamble, so of course you have to look at other avenues. .I'm going to point out something very specific about this source. Take a look at its sources. None of them seem to be credible. And if you look, they cannot tell the difference between fraud and real. "Oxford Dictionaries" looks impressive, but it is not the real thing, which is oed.com. Pharmabiz.com does not appear to be a credible site. Holyhormones?
Before taking a piece of information as truth, it helps to know where that information is coming from.
You only want to hear what you want to hear, nothing will ever convince you, be it right or wrong.You are joking, right?
Did you see that article I mentioned a few posts back? That's you. You just rationalized your gullibility and willingness to accept claims with zero support, based entirely on your axiomatic belief that anything mainstream must by definition be lies. That is not how skepticism works. You are not exercising the slightest bit of discernment in picking what to trust. If it says what you want it to say, then you accept it; if not, then it's part of the conspiracy.The thing is we cannot go by those who we believe should know, for they are the ones who are behind the whole shamble, so of course you have to look at other avenues. .
You also have no sense of irony, I see. You are the one who is operating entirely on blind faith, since you don't believe in evidence. You tell yourself that we're the blind ones, the gullible ones, but it's you. The rest of us have minds that could be changed with sufficient evidence, which you can't provide (because it doesn't exist). You are the one who disregards all evidence that doesn't confirm his paranoid conspiracy theory. There is literally nothing anybody could say or do to change your mind, since you'll just claim it's part of the conspiracy.You only want to hear what you want to hear, nothing will ever convince you, be it right or wrong.
Thank you for your reply.Did you see that article I mentioned a few posts back? That's you. You just rationalized your gullibility and willingness to accept claims with zero support, based entirely on your axiomatic belief that anything mainstream must by definition be lies. That is not how skepticism works. You are not exercising the slightest bit of discernment in picking what to trust. If it says what you want it to say, then you accept it; if not, then it's part of the conspiracy.
You also have no sense of irony, I see. You are the one who is operating entirely on blind faith, since you don't believe in evidence. You tell yourself that we're the blind ones, the gullible ones, but it's you. The rest of us have minds that could be changed with sufficient evidence, which you can't provide (because it doesn't exist). You are the one who disregards all evidence that doesn't confirm his paranoid conspiracy theory. There is literally nothing anybody could say or do to change your mind, since you'll just claim it's part of the conspiracy.
My bad, I took it the other way.Sorry if you thiought that sentence meant exactly as it read - It was intended to be an expression of incredulity at somebody actually appearing to think that this might be the case.
An Indian who thinks something is not right has every right to approach courts. There could be tricks in Bill Gates program in India if they are doing it without government's permission. Now it is for the Courts to decide if that is the case. However, the link does not tell anything about the people behind the site. Who knows if it is by people who wanted to get money out of Bill Gates philanthropy but did not succeed?
Yes who knows, but I do feel that they take advantage of poorer countries, who knows what they have been doing.An Indian who thinks something is not right has every right to approach courts. There could be tricks in Bill Gates program in India if they are doing it without government's permission. Now it is for the Courts to decide if that is the case. However, the link does not tell anything about the people behind the site. Who knows if it is by people who wanted to get money out of Bill Gates philanthropy but did not succeed?