Rick O'Shez
Irishman bouncing off walls
Actually, they said last year they were going to install a new system sometime this year that doesn't involve fish bladders as filtration. So it should be vegan soon.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Actually, they said last year they were going to install a new system sometime this year that doesn't involve fish bladders as filtration. So it should be vegan soon.
That is kind-of accurate except it leaves out a lot.Going strictly by the Bible, at Genesis 9:3-4, Jehovah God allowed animals to serve as food for mankind, from Noah onward. Only blood should be avoided (emptied / drained out as much as possible.)
I see that as a misuse of the word "love" because you just love to eat and there is no love for the cow.I love my beef, cheese, and milk! Oh, well.
Yes - and it is a realization - as like having an enlightenment.Couldn't it be the realization that four-legged people deserve the same moral consideration as bipeds?
That is sensible and perfectly logical but still in practice I find it to be wrong and backwards.Baha'i is a progressive revelation; a progressive expansion of man's moral universe. First we learn to extend moral consideration to other tribes and races, then to whole other nations, eventually to all sentient, feeling creatures.
According to your logic, it would follow that, since God says people can eat meat, God's turning people into sinners!?That is kind-of accurate except it leaves out a lot.
As in the verse above that one tells a little more in Genesis 9:2
"And the fear of you and the dread of you shall be upon every beast of the earth, and upon every fowl of the air, upon all that moveth upon the earth, and upon all the fishes of the sea; into your hand are they delivered." Link.
The animals use to be friendly and safe but now according to that verse 2 the animals are made to live in fear and dread of the barbaric humans - that is a part of the price paid for eating animals.
At first the animals did not fear mankind - but now they do because of our violence.
Also in the New Testament Jesus said a peculiar thing here = " He saith unto them, Moses because of the hardness of your hearts suffered you to put away your wives: but from the beginning it was not so." Link Matthew 19:8.
Jesus tells us to look back to the BEGINNING to find the truth, and it was only because of the hardness of human hearts that things changed. In the beginning humans did not eat animals, but after sin and sinning took control then humans ate the animals and got divorces and it was NOT meant to be that way.
Sinners are allowed to eat animals, but a righteous person must go back to the beginning and stop it.
I see that as a misuse of the word "love" because you just love to eat and there is no love for the cow.
To me we can not call anything as love when the thing is being destroyed by our so called love.
That is just a hardened heart.
If we do not care about the blood and guts and flesh of an animal on our food plate then it is impossible to care about other people whom we can not see.
Couldn't it be the realization that four-legged people deserve the same moral consideration as bipeds?
Baha'i is a progressive revelation; a progressive expansion of man's moral universe. First we learn to extend moral consideration to other tribes and races, then to whole other nations, eventually to all sentient, feeling creatures.
Well a somewhat related Baha'i principle is kindness to animals...
Then, O ye friends of God! Ye must not only have kind and merciful feelings for mankind, but ye should also exercise the utmost kindness towards every living creature. The physical sensibilities and instincts are common to animal and man. Man is, however, negligent of this reality and imagines that sensibility is peculiar to mankind, therefore he practices cruelty to the animal. In reality what difference is there in physical sensations! Sensibility is the same whether you harm man or animal: there is no difference. Nay, rather, cruelty to the animal is more painful because man has a tongue and he sighs, complains and groans when he receives an injury and complains to the government and the government protects him from cruelty; but the poor animal cannot speak, it can neither show its suffering nor is it able to appeal to the government. If it is harmed a thousand times by man it is not able to defend itself in words nor can it seek justice or retaliate. Therefore one must be very considerate towards animals and show greater kindness to them than to man. Educate the children in their infancy in such a way that they may become exceedingly kind and merciful to the animals. If an animal is sick they should endeavor to cure it; if it is hungry, they should feed it; if it is thirsty, they should satisfy its thirst; if it is tired, they should give it rest.
Man is generally sinful and the animal is innocent; unquestionably one must be more kind and merciful to the innocent."
~ Abdu'l-Baha, Baha'i World Faith - , p. 373
Lots of people quote the Bible saying people have dominion over the animals, but none ever quotes the following verses which tells people to be vegetarian:
28 And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.
29 And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat.
30 And to every beast of the earth, and to every fowl of the air, and to every thing that creepeth upon the earth, wherein there is life, I have given every green herb for meat: and it was so. KJV, Genesis 1:28-30
----------------
So it says DOMINION and directly thereafter it says to eat only the herb and fruit - not to eat the animals.
It is misunderstood to call it as sin because most people have no idea of what the word sin really means.According to your logic, it would follow that, since God says people can eat meat, God's turning people into sinners!?
Not only is that ridiculous, it's also impossible....God Himself sets the standard for what is righteous, and what is sinful. So if God approves of the action, it can't be sin!
The stupid animals have been tricked and deceived, as like a horse will buck until it is broken.You said: "At first the animals did not fear mankind - but now they do because of our violence."
As many times as I've been on a farm, I've never had a cow "fear" me....or a pig.
Of course we all saw that.(The subject Jesus was discussing in Matthew 19:4-8 is completely different and more important, regarding one wife to one husband. And for Christians, that applies.
It is arguable that Jesus never created any laws, and Jesus only told principles and ideals for us to reach for.But Jesus imposed no laws against eating meat. Putting further burdens on people that are not backed by the Scriptures, is harsh and Pharisaical. Matthew 11:28-30 should apply to us, as it did Jesus.)
That is kind-of accurate except it leaves out a lot.I'm sure you know that after the flood:
KJV Genesis 9:3 Every moving thing that liveth shall be meat for you; even as the green herb have I given you all things.
By this permission man may with a good conscience use the creatures of God for his needs (NIV)
Jesus tells us to look back to the BEGINNING to find the truth
I do not like the claim that God allows anything, because people do our sins regardless of what God allows.Now, please reason on this: if God thought that our eating animals would affect our caring about other humans, do you really think He would allow it? There is no way.
I did that already, but here it is again:Out of curiosity, can you reference this in this context ?
Personally, I think that people who restrict their diet on religion grounds ought to truly understand the religious reasons for the dietary restriction. Otherwise, they risk doing an injustice to themselves.
Here's an Old Testament Excerpt for the Bible Thumpers:
Adam knew his wife Eve intimately, and she conceived and bore Cain. She said, "I have had a male child with the Lord's help."And one from the New Testament:
Then she also gave birth to his brother Abel. Now Abel became a shepherd of a flock, but Cain cultivated the land. In the course of time Cain presented some of the land's produce as an offering to the Lord. And Abel also presented [an offering] – some of the firstborn of his flock and their fat portions. The Lord had regard for Abel and his offering, but He did not have regard for Cain and his offering. Cain was furious, and he was downcast.
Then the Lord said to Cain, "Why are you furious? And why are you downcast? If you do right, won't you be accepted? But if you do not do right, sin is crouching at the door. Its desire is for you, but you must master it."
Cain said to his brother Abel, "Let's go out to the field."
And while they were in the field, Cain attacked his brother Abel and killed him.
— Genesis 4:1–8 (Holman Christian Standard Bible)
Do not be like Cain, who belonged to the evil one and murdered his brother. And why did he murder him? Because his own actions were evil and his brother’s were righteous."
— 1 John 3:12
What goes into someone's mouth does not defile them, but what comes out of their mouth, that is what defiles them
— Mathew 15:11 (New International Version)
And the Qur'an:
[Prophet], tell them the truth about the story of Adam's two sons: each of them offered a sacrifice, and it was accepted from one and not the other. One said, 'I will kill you,' but the other said, 'God only accepts the sacrifice of those who are mindful of Him. If you raise your hand to kill me, I will not raise mine to kill you. I fear God, the Lord of all worlds, and I would rather you were burdened with my sins as well as yours and became an inhabitant of the Fire: such is the evildoers' reward.' But his soul prompted him to kill his brother: he killed him and became one of the losers. God sent a raven to scratch up the ground and show him how to cover his brother's corpse and he said, 'Woe is me! Could I not have been like this raven and covered up my brother's body?' He became remorseful.
— The QUR'AN (English translation by M.A.S. Abdel Haleem)
It is a step in the right direction, but it is not the whole thing.The point here is that being someone who kills plants instead of killing animals does not actually make you a less violent person or a more holy person.
I do not like people who turn vegetarian simply for their health and have no care or regard about the animals.Eastern religions, on the other hand, sometimes see vegetarianism as a practice of ahimsa or ahinsa. This comes from the belief that eating animals would incur a greater negative karmic influence than eating plants. In other words, it is not simply out of a belief that animals deserve "dignity and respect" yet somehow plants do not deserve dignity or respect, but rather the notion that we can modify our karma and obtain release from it through austerities and purity of conduct.
I do not like the claim that God allows anything, because people do our sins regardless of what God allows.
Under that view of God allowing then God must allow world wars and little wars, God must allow rape and robberies and poverty and injustice and etc etc etc.
That is not accurate, see James 4 = "From whence come wars and fightings among you? come they not hence, even of your lusts that war in your members?"
And James 2:10 = "For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all."
====================================
I did that already, but here it is again:
In the New Testament Jesus said a peculiar thing here = " He saith unto them, Moses because of the hardness of your hearts suffered you to put away your wives: but from the beginning it was not so." Link Matthew 19:8.
Jesus tells us to look back to the BEGINNING to find the truth, and it was only because of the hardness of human hearts that things changed. In the beginning humans did not eat animals, but after sin and sinning took control then humans ate the animals and got divorces and it was NOT meant to be that way.
I do not like the claim that God allows anything,
Moses created the writ of divorce for the people.was divorce ever explicitly condoned as eating meat was in Genesis 9:3?
I apply it to fish - certainly yes.Also would your interpretation apply to fish?