Cre·a·tion·ism
krēˈāSHəˌnizəm/
noun
- the belief that the universe and living organisms originate from specific acts of divine creation, as in the biblical account, rather than by natural processes such as evolution.
Is there any? I often hear creationists lean on arguments from ignorance or the present lack of scientific understanding, but I've never heard of any verifiable evidence for it.
All theories in science are stated in their general form. Which means to say that both creation of the earth 6.000 years ago would be creation theory, as well as creation of the earth 100.000 years ago would be creation theory. Likewise it is still creation theory irrespective if God or Satan created the earth.
The mechanism of creation is choosing. The agency of the decision is regarded as a subjective issue in creationism, so falls outside of science. The evidence for freedom being real and relevant is abundant. Based upon this fact there are several creation theories about how organisms for instance, are chosen to be the way they are. Organisms can be formed by many independent decisions coincedentally coming together forming a whole organism, or they can be formed by one or a few decisions choosing the whole organism at once, or any other variation of how things are chosen.
Many independent decisions coincedentally forming a whole organism would result in much more crappy organism than we see today, even considering that natural selection can sort out some of the crap, the amount of crap configurations available is simply too large.
The evidence of the efficient functionally integrated organisms that we see points to intelligent design, meaning that organisms are chosen as a whole in one decision, with an apparent design principle of survival or reproduction. That is to say all parts of the organism work in regards to the event of survival or reproduction.
The fact that the mathematical ordering of the DNA world is the same as that of the physical universe, point to there being a 3D DNA world like a computersimulation, or human imagination. The physical organisms develops guided by the DNA organism.
In the DNA world the fully functional adult DNA organism is chosen.
Maybe by using natural selection to look into the future. As natural selection is explained in terms of force, and the result of force principles can be known in advance (for example we can know the orbit of the earth around the sun in advance, because it is largely forced), natural selection can be used to look into the future. Death for example does not consist of anything. So when looking into the future, then configurations for organisms which die, or cannot even be assembled, simply do not show up in the future as possibilities. That is one way of cutting the number of enumerated possible configurations down, which number is humongous, to a number of configurations which are relatively small, and has a high concentration of workable designs.
I am sure we can all agree that we are very bored with evolution science, and we want scientists to go looking for the DNA world which we are sure exists. It just means transforming the radio signal from DNA, which signal has already been found, to a video signal of a 3D computer graphics simulation. Then we can see inside the DNA world on a computer screen. Or so to say, most of the work has already been done, how hard can it be, why are biologists boring everybody with this stupid evolution theory?
