Thank you for clarifying that, but what I was getting at was his literal interpretation of such quotes and how he stated they fit hand-in-hand with science.
Oh, I agree to demand that metaphorical passages prove science is inexplicably obtuse.
However, it makes interesting implications.
One can read passages of Baha`u'llah concerning transmutation of the spirit using the symbol of turning copper into gold. He says with the proper "elixit" it can be done in the twinkling of any.
Well, it's metaphor for things of the spirit.
He also says that copper left in nature's furnace will also transmute to gold.
I see an implication if "nature's furnace is considered to be a symbol for the heart of a Population I star; which at the moment of its destruction transmutes iron and elements lighter than iron into the heavier elements "in the twinkling of an eye". Iron becomes copper, becomes gold, becomes platinum, becomes thorium, becomes plutonium. . .
Should this be offered as scientific proof? Hardly. Should it cause some interesting conjectures? It does for me.
Regards,
Scott