paarsurrey
Veteran Member
You are right. Quran is a book of signs, sure.The Quran is not a book of science, it is a book of signs
Regards
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
You are right. Quran is a book of signs, sure.The Quran is not a book of science, it is a book of signs
you should pay better attentionI did not mention anything about camel in my post that he responded. Did I? Please
Regards
The Quran points to some scientific and historical information. usually, when We point at something, We don't give details
Who wrote "Islam established in the conquered"? PleaseYou used this same history to try and prove islam was not spread by blood. You failed and your the one who brought that quote into the forum.
You supplied the link.
The city of Sofia fell in 1385. Islam established in the conquered
Please be alert. Will you? PleaseYawn.
Historically even by innocent animal peaceful Islam reached and spread in Australia. History testifies it. Right? Pleaseyou should pay better attention
Who wrote "Islam established in the conquered"? Please
Regards
Please be alert. Will you? Please
Regards
How credible can something be if no details are provided ? Seems to hold no value what so ever historically.
Really its a non answer on your part.
But I will provide a fact, no credible scholars, not one in the whole world, uses the koran for any aspect of jesus or Israelite history.
. It is there to make us contemplate and do more study.
Historically even by innocent animal peaceful Islam reached and spread in Australia. History testifies it. Right? Please
Regards
Who wrote "Islam established in the conquered"?
What good is study if you have to refuse credible knowledge and education?
It is totally wrong that Islam spread by the sword. Muhammad defended his faith, his religion and his people. Is it wrong to defend one? PleaseHi everyone. Some people say that Islam was spread by the sword. Others say that it was not. The Koran says that there is to be no compulsion in religion so it would seem that Islam's sacred text would condone religious freedom. But was this really the case historically? Here is the reference from the Koran which I am referring to.
We don't refuse any credible facts
I have never met a muslim who accepts credible history or science.
Example, moses and abraham FACTUALLY have no historicity as ever existing. The exodus never took place as written by all credible academic knowledge.
Yet you would not accept this.
You also do not accept that muhammads cousin was a heretic priest and was known for writing Arabic versions of the bible, and he found muhammad at the age of 5 wondering around the mountains. This would be where muhammad learned his heretical biblical knowledge.
The same heretic priest is also said to be the first one to claim he was a prophet
You also refuse the knowledge that islam incorporated biblical mythology into its own mythology. That's is islam plagiarized biblical traditions.
Those (others) who say that it (Islam) was not (spread with sword are absolutely right). There is no compulsion in religion because compulsion cannot win one's heart, compulsion could create a hypocrite not a believer who would sacrifice his life for Islam. Islam generates free souls, loves freedom of one's opinion and one's religion ,freedom of worship and freedom of places of worship not only of the Muslims but even of the Christians, Jews, Zoroastrians etc, etc, etc...........etc.Hi everyone. Some people say that Islam was spread by the sword. Others say that it was not. The Koran says that there is to be no compulsion in religion so it would seem that Islam's sacred text would condone religious freedom. But was this really the case historically? Here is the reference from the Koran which I am referring to.