Sand Dancer
Currently catless
Did he actually drink the wine? Not scriptural.
That's probably one of the few things they had to drink. The water probably was not very potable back then.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Did he actually drink the wine? Not scriptural.
Why would a God bleed during crucifixion?
Immortal but able to die always struck me as odd.
Good question, good comment. Both are answered in the Gospels.
Immortal but able to die always struck me as odd.
It's not either yes or no. You can debate the topic till the cows come home, but it is impossible to provide much evidence for either position. Most Mormons believe that it is possible that Jesus was married, but, regardless of the opinions of the individuals whose names you mention, the LDS Church never has taken an official stance on the matter.The marriage of the Savior was taught more often in early church history, by leaders like President Brigham Young, George Q. Cannon, President Wilford Woodruff, Orson Pratt, Jedediah M. Grant, President Joseph F. Smith, and President Heber C. Kimball, to name just a few. In a General Conference address on October 6, 1854, Orson Hyde of the Quorum of the Twelve discussed the Savior’s wedding recounted in the Bible:
"…Jesus was the bridegroom at the marriage of Cana of Galilee, and he told them what to do. Now there was actually a marriage, and if Jesus was not the bridegroom on that occasion, please tell who was. If any man can show this, and prove that it was not the Savior of the world, then I will acknowledge I am in error. We say it was Jesus Christ who was married, to be brought into the relation whereby he could see his seed, before he was crucified." (Journal of Discourses, Vol. 2, p. 82, 83).
http://www.mormonchronicle.com/our-married-savior-jesus-christ/
Just food for thought. Or debate.
Its easier to see it symbolically when even the physical miracles tie into a deeper truth, like making a "blind man see", has more connotations than just curing blindness. Taking it literally makes it start to sound a bit outlandish, like drink my blood and eat my flesh is not to be taken literally, the bread of life has a deeper meaning, the cleansing of sin is symbolic or Jesus would still have taken all the OT laws literally and say we should still sacrifice for real.Then whole thing is odd and much with bias writings
Its easier to see it symbolically when even the physical miracles tie into a deeper truth, like making a "blind man see", has more connotations than just curing blindness. Taking it literally makes it start to sound a bit outlandish, like drink my blood and eat my flesh is not to be taken literally, the bread of life has a deeper meaning, the cleansing of sin is symbolic or Jesus would still have taken all the OT laws literally and say we should still sacrifice for real.
The crucification didn't stop sacrifice. Believers in Jesus continued to offer sacrifices at the Temple, including St. Paul until Titus destroyed the Temple in the Jerusalem War, circa 64-70 C.E.Its easier to see it symbolically when even the physical miracles tie into a deeper truth, like making a "blind man see", has more connotations than just curing blindness. Taking it literally makes it start to sound a bit outlandish, like drink my blood and eat my flesh is not to be taken literally, the bread of life has a deeper meaning, the cleansing of sin is symbolic or Jesus would still have taken all the OT laws literally and say we should still sacrifice for real.
I mean Crucifixion. Did I spell that right?The crucification didn't stop sacrifice. Believers in Jesus continued to offer sacrifices at the Temple, including St. Paul until Titus destroyed the Temple in the Jerusalem War, circa 64-70 C.E.
Jesus never married in the NT or the OT.
The wedding feast in heaven spoken of in Revelation is for Jesus and His bride, the Church.
Mormons need to study the Bible and throw all of their other "religious" books in the trash. Joseph Smith and the Mormon Church teaches much doctrine against that of Christ.
Should Jesus release his tax return?I would like to order the court transcripts from his trials and tribulations. Maybe get his marriage certificate from the courts also.
Should Jesus release his tax return?
The bible never mentions Jesus pooping either. Doesn't mean he didn't.
Now that you mention it, why would a god need to poop?
That wasn't very nice of you, nor was it the kind of behavior I've come to expect from a Catholic.Mormons need to study the Bible and throw all of their other "religious" books in the trash. Joseph Smith and the Mormon Church teaches much doctrine against that of Christ.
The sad truth is that government documents, whatever documents the Roman Empire might have kept. . .I would like to order the court transcripts from his trials and tribulations. Maybe get his marriage certificate from the courts also. What happened between the NT and OT is very valueable to me. Those documents hidden from the public are just as valueable as their bibles. But I would have to find a way into the basement of the Vatican or Israel's vault. Does anybody know if any of the Sweedish guards at the Vatican are female? I concider myself to be a smooth talker with the ladies and just love when they yodel.