You are the one that referenced wiki
Yes, and I could do the same with Jesus. I could reference any number of studies on the historicity of Jesus, including Wikipedia. I know because I wrote parts of some that have remained unchanged for years. I referenced wiki to show one specific thing: what type of evidence we usually have (even for an emperor).
Your response was to go to the wiki page and insist that we should trust the authority of wiki that the sources we have used sources that we've never seen. You don't know why, and you can't explain why, because in all your criticisms, misuses of classical fallacies, pathetic knowledge of history and historical methods, and so on, you aren't able to support the assertion that the wiki page makes: the historians used sources we don't have and never did.
Your faith in authority is remarkable. When you want something to be true, you don't care about using logic, reason, or your own standards. You accept a non-authority and dismiss thousands of actual authorities whose works you've never read yet that hasn't stopped you from describing them.
We see how you come to baseless conclusions. Jesus was the primary source? :biglaugh:
If Jesus as mythical, there is no way he could be the primary source. If he as historical, then he'd have to be (no matter how much was altered or changed in our sources).
My conclusions are based on research. I have continually asked you to demonstrate that you have any basic knowledge of this topic through reading primary and secondary (modern scholarship) sources. You haven't been able to. The best you can do is cut and paste from online sources, ignore challenges, be incredibly skeptical when it suits you and unbelievably credulous when it doesn't, and in general dogmatically regurgitate the same unsubstantiated claims you selected from a tiny set of authors about a period you know next to nothing of to support a religious-like faith in mythicist ideology. You accuse me of biases and all sorts of things (you can't even understand fallacies well enough to insult me accurately), yet you have still refused to offer any basis for your position other than repeating ad nauseam the same Mythicist Creed over and over. None so blind...