Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
YOU HERETIC! Die witch DIE!
Your posts have been pretty much on the mark as this one is but I wanted to adjust one thing. The Crusaders were mostly petty noblemen who were losing their butt economically and though they could acquire new lands and riches in the Holy land. They used God as an excuse for plundering, theft, simply taking land, murder of Muslim, Jew, and even Christians, and even cannibalism. Most were not Christians but took the Popes crusade as a way to enrich them which explains why they do so much attacking of things that had little to do with the return of Jerusalem. There are exceptions but in general the crusaders were scum bags and at least once in history the Muslims acted more honorably in general. The rest of history is the exact opposite but I must give them there one moment in the sun. BTW Islams great contribution to science was mainly in retaining and sudying Greek texts while the Catholics were burning them as fast as possible. They added onto some, but invented very little original scientific knowledge.
Just kidding
All religions have had this issue but Jews no longer stone people and Christians do longer go on Crusades. The issue is that not all religions have progressed and moved on past their negative issues. Almost all religions have modernized except for Islam. Islam just seems to be lagging behind while other nations who are of other faiths are progressing.
Yes no more stoning, now bullets and bombs instead.
.
The actual impetus for the crusades was a legitimate one. To stop the Muslim Turks from attacking pilgrims going to the Holy Land. It also afforded the Western Roman authorities (incl the Pope) an opportunity to muscle in on the Eastern empire. The Church decided it would use some kind of God wills it to justify and inspire everyone. Mostly it was Europe's rabble and petty nobles. They would yell "God wills it" and then kill God's children in town after town. As despicable as the crusaders were they are a fascinating period of history.
I believe most religious wars are crap as well. However there have been many people willing to fight and risk death for the cause of God. Like you say, not many people prefer to die for God but many are willing if necessary. There is a Roman Record where Pilots successor sent a letter back to Rome that said the policy of killing any Jews or Christians that will not declare Caesar a God is a failure. He said he was simply killing everyone in Israel on an industrial scale because almost no one would agree to call Caesar God. He said change the policy or there would be no one left to declare anyone a God. Islam does not die in a martyrs death. They are willing to accept death if they can take out a bunch of people who had nothing to do with anything and which always makes most people condemn them even stronger. It is one of the most futile and grotesque acts in the name of any God ever done. Muslim terrorists kill more people in a year (and in some "good" months) than were killed in the entire 400 year history of the Spanish inquisition. They kill more in an average week than the KKK did in its entire 50 year history. I wonder what they think will come of this garbage? Gnats will never defeat a bear. America has a long track record of being slow to act but once the entire nation commits, nations are annihilated
Says the guy who can't stay on topic and forges text that doesn't exist.
You my friend are a hypocrite just look at what you typed here. Aren't you the one who is saying that Mohammed(saws) was violent, that he was possessed by the devil and that Islam is the teachings of the anti-Christ because it doesn't agree with your own beliefs?
No i didn't agree again putting words in my mouth for no reason, a writing or paper doesn't necessarily to be written by someone to be from him and i already told you those papers (writings) has hes signature on it.
Again a lot of blabla but no refutation of the evidence i presented, when you are shoved into a corner all you do is make personal remarks how professional Robin.
Holy Quran ch33:v57 alislam.org/quran
That's it I am done with your veiled hostility, used as an ironic defense of a "peaceful" religion and cries of bias for every single inconvenient claim without even an attempt at proving it in most cases. I could have quoted Hadith and have countless times though I have no burden of needing them. They mean little to me or any other non Muslim and are well known to be biased by historical scholars. They are worse than actual historical accounts, are truly biased in every sense of the word, though they and they alone can be used to show that Muhammad was a very violent human being, worse than most of any time, much less for a prophet. In fact one of my next few posts will contain many Hadith references, so you will have to invent a new way to wiggle out of obvious facts. However I am not interested in discussing this further with a person that makes claims that are so petty and personal.
I am sure assassinations, raiding caravans, oppressing poets, chopping off of hands and feet of men who surrendered, heads of many others, digging pits a throwing bodies of people killed AFTER the battle was over by the hundreds, and marrying children did not occupy all his time. He also had time to exhibit the exact symptoms that the Bible uses to describe demonic possession when he had his "revelations". He also had time to borrow pre-Islamic myths, adopt the worship practices of pagan Arabians, borrow stories from heretical and gnostic Jews, and get Biblical events all confused and incorrect. You tube will not fix any of this. All of this I have posted examples and sources for and no challenge beyond a minor one two people gave and the common cries of bias that were unproven, have even been attempted. No amount of contrived or even literal good deeds can rescue Muhammads diabolical record. His time was sure not spend giving the supernatural proof of his prophethood that true prophets of God had given for thousands of years previously even when challanged to do so. If you stay tuned I am shortly going to provide much more examples and the Islamic sources they come from.
I will give you credit for at least attempting to give evidence against a claim about Muhammad. (Most do not) This will take a bit to evaluate and I will respond soon.
Go back several pages and see what you wrote.. i hope you will come to the same conclusion you don't want to debate or discuss you just want to be right and if you can't be right you have to make personal remarks or fabricate nonsense. Where is this hadith that you spoke off? Where is this claim that we don't have scripture that belongs to Mohammed(saws)?
He knows nothing about the OT (Old-Testament) and the problems that it brings with it.How you explain Jesus second coming for making wars and killing all disbelievers on earth (Armageddon)
Rev (6:13) and the stars in the sky fell to earth, as figs drop from a fig tree when shaken by a strong wind.
Yes the stars are very small and will fall like fig.
Jer (49:14) I have heard a message from the LORD; an envoy was sent to the nations to say, "Assemble yourselves to attack it! Rise up for battle!"
Zec (14:2) I will gather all the nations to Jerusalem to fight against it; the city will be captured, the houses ransacked, and the women raped. Half of the city will go into exile, but the rest of the people will not be taken from the city.
it seems Jerusalem is a superpower at those days that all nations is needed to fight one city.
Zec (14:3) Then the LORD will go out and fight against those nations, as he fights on a day of battle.
Rev (19:11) I saw heaven standing open and there before me was a white horse, whose rider is called Faithful and True. With justice he judges and wages war.
Rev (19:13) He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.
Rev (19:14) The armies of heaven were following him, riding on white horses and dressed in fine linen, white and clean.
it seems Jerusalem is a superpower at those days that all nations is needed to fight one city.