There was a great deal of attention paid to cosmology and astronomy before Copernicus came along.
Indeed. https://www.cs.mcgill.ca/~rwest/wikispeedia/wpcd/wp/h/Heliocentrism.htm
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
There was a great deal of attention paid to cosmology and astronomy before Copernicus came along.
You just can't help yourself can you? Me too! I stayed out of these for a few months and popped back in a few weeks ago to see if there was anything enlightening going on. There wasn't - but its a bit like those TV soap operas that everyone despises but somehow can't switch off. Strangely and annoyingly addictive.
Why don't you tell us how you really feel @Trailblazer - I'd be interested in @adrian009 's take on this though - I seem to recall he objected strongly to my suggestion that profoundly religious experiences might be delusional. I'm guessing he'll probably try to defend his fellow Baha'i by suggesting that in the current context it means "mistaken" rather than "mentally confused".
Correct - you have a habit of side-tracking points though - the point is not about whether ancient peoples or medieval Islamic scholars - or anyone else - had devised a heliocentric model - the question is about whether anyone did that directly or indirectly as a result of what Muhammad "revealed" as a "Messenger of God". And the answer of course is no - they did not. They failed - even on the basis of the Muhammadan revelation - to perceive of a truth that already been hinted at by ancient cosmologies stretching back (again) more than a thousand years before Muhammad. Didn't they?!!There was a great deal of attention paid to cosmology and astronomy before Copernicus came along.
I know - I put it down to my JW training. But that was in a previous life.You're so good at prophecy, lol.
No, absolutely not. Only Christians who believe in the doctrines of the Church are deluded, because they are man-made doctrines and do not represent what Jesus ever said.But everyone except for one small break off sect of Islam is deluded.
How do you know what Jesus ever said?Only Christians who believe in the doctrines of the Church are deluded, because they are man-made doctrines and do not represent what Jesus ever said.
That makes all those millions of Christians deluded doesn't it?
Yes it does.
Why don't you tell us how you really feel @Trailblazer - I'd be interested in @adrian009 's take on this though - I seem to recall he objected strongly to my suggestion that profoundly religious experiences might be delusional. I'm guessing he'll probably try to defend his fellow Baha'i by suggesting that in the current context it means "mistaken" rather than "mentally confused".
The context of my answer to CG "Yes it does" is that Christians who believe that Jesus was God in the flesh are deluded, IMB.Why don't you tell us how you really feel @Trailblazer - I'd be interested in @adrian009 's take on this though - I seem to recall he objected strongly to my suggestion that profoundly religious experiences might be delusional. I'm guessing he'll probably try to defend his fellow Baha'i by suggesting that in the current context it means "mistaken" rather than "mentally confused".
I don't know what Jesus said, I only know what Jesus allegedly said, according to the Gospels.How do you know what Jesus ever said?
You are referring to this statement of Abdulbaha:So what? He got his facts wrong - that much is certain - did he deliberately present a skewed view in order to influence his audience or was he genuinely confused about the historical occurrences of infanticide? Hype or tripe are the only options in this case, I'm afraid.
No - not a chance - that blog convinces me even more that any heliocentric interpretation of Qur'anic verses is contrived...the very fact that some of the verses put the planets in the "lowest heaven" betrays a Ptolemaic view to start with. Of course everyone knew that light came from the sun - that doesn't put the sun at the center. In the Qur'an, the sun is still racing across the sky to "it's place" - just as it had in Hebrew cosmology a thousand or two years earlier. Anyway, I'll allow a second appeal on this one if you can quote a single authority in the Islamic "Golden Age" that espoused a heliocentric cosmology based any of these verses before Copernicus and Gallileo. If that's what Muhammad meant it surely couldn't have escaped all of them.
PS - here's a link to a page with dozens of generally accepted English translations of the verse referenced in the Baha'i account of Abdu'l Baha's talk - none of them seem to me to indicate anything to do with a heliocentric model of the solar system - anyone disagree?
https://www.islamawakened.com/quran/36/38/
But everyone except for one small break off sect of Islam is deluded. You should know that by now, after all this 'debate'. Have at it, Sir. I shan't be joining this time around. (Well I just did I guess. Shucks.)
I wonder how long this one will go. Surely it can't beat the other one, which finally died. LoverofHumanity and Tony don't seem to be around, but it seems there are always others to step in to the shoes, start a new thread that allows for plenty of Baha'i' talk, and then just wait. It's quite the pattern now.
Good and important information which would have been helpful at the beginning of the marathon thread. But then again it would have not been the same thread anymoreNice to see you pop in.
I'm certainly not wanting another marathon thread either. I like it when people give their views, have some informative discussion, and if opinions differ, agree to disagree. No alternative motive other than a thought provoking discussion either.
You may be interested that we have a female Baha'i posting @Trailblazer . I recall you wondered if there was a reason why none of the Baha'is on the previous thread were female.
Good and important information which would have been helpful at the beginning of the marathon thread. But then again it would have not been the same thread anymore
Oh Adrian - I am disappointed - when I made a point about the connection between delusion and religious beliefs I got a full blown lecture on why DSM5 specifically excludes religious beliefs (no matter how bizarre) from symptoms betraying a delusional state of mind - your fellow Baha'i gets away with "it just means they believe differently"?I personally would say they are Christian beliefs and leave it at that.
Yes IT - you catch on pretty quickly! So does the page I linked to contain accurate English translations of the verse from the Qur'an that Abdu'l Baha was referring to? Do any of them even giving a reasonably wide latitude of interpretation - even remotely support the argument that the Qur'an promotes a heliocentric model of the solar system? Is it not truer to suggest that, at best, this verse possibly allows - but certainly doesn't support - that interpretation.You are referring to this statement of Abdulbaha:
"But in the Qur’án a number of verses were revealed which contradicted the Ptolemaic system. One of them, “The sun moves in a fixed place of its own”,[6] alludes to the fixity of the sun and its movement around an axis. "
Some answered questions
Your mammoth thread is not as long as a thread on another forum I used to post on entitled "Why Jesus is not a God." It has 32, 991 posts... It and it has been going since December 2009 and it is still going, with new posts added each day. Essentially it is a debate between a couple of Christians and a couple of Jews.This thread is a drop in the ocean by comparison!
18.000 replies. Wow, and still not everything was said. God/Messengers must be great. Keep you all on your toes for 18.000 posts is proof enoughFYI @Vinayaka , @siti, @InvestigateTruth , myself and quite a few others participated in this mammoth thread for much of last year.
https://www.religiousforums.com/threads/how-are-these-great-beings-explained.195981/
It had nearly 18,000 posts! None of us want to go down that rabbit hole again lol.
This thread is a drop in the ocean by comparison!
Oh Adrian - I am disappointed - when I made a point about the connection between delusion and religious beliefs I got a full blown lecture on why DSM5 specifically excludes religious beliefs (no matter how bizarre) from symptoms betraying a delusional state of mind - your fellow Baha'i gets away with "it just means they believe differently"?
Anyway, since I didn't bring it up this time, I don't feel quite so reticent in following up - especially since we are discussing Muhammad's Messengership (is that a new word I just made up?)
If Jesus did not allegedly allege that he was God and those who allegedly do allege that he was even though he allegedly does not allege that in any of his alleged sayings - allegedly - do indeed allege that he was, is it appropriate to allege delusion on their part? And if so, could not the same argument also be alleged against people who allege that Muhammad was allegedly the Messenger of God in a manner in which none of the alleged sayings of Muhammad allegedly allege?
Your mammoth thread is not as long as a thread on another forum I used to post on entitled "Why Jesus is not a God." It has 32, 991 posts... It and it has been going since December 2009 and it is still going, with new posts added each day. Essentially it is a debate between a couple of Christians and a couple of Jews.