Due to names from 500 BCE and to transpose to locations. Yet I am getting lost. I'll do my best to show what I comprehend so far.
@Aupmanyav showed that Girivraja, Rajgriha, Magadha are far east, far away from Mohenjo Daro, which is what brought my attention to this and the reason why I asked.
@Bharat Jhunjhunwala @GoodAttention @Aupmanyav @shunyadragon
I'm seeing if I comprehend this about transpose words names. This word transpose was used in the book Common Prophets
@Bharat Jhunjhunwala and it confuses me. I get lost at times.
If I understand correctly Due to finding names 500 BCE. Then transpose names in the locations of ancient India are based on Rama and Krishna situations in ancient India. Example: see quote below from
@Bharat Jhunjhunwala showing the old cyclopean wall dates from 500 BCE, indicates that Rajgir did not exist at 1500 BCE. Because of this, name transpose to location in Ancient India
If you read the quotation carefully, the 2500-year-old cyclopean wall, which dates from 500 BCE, indicates that Rajgir did not exist at 1500 BCE.
@Aupmanyav showed that Girivraja, Rajgriha, Magadha are far east, far away from Mohenjo Daro, which is what brought my attention to this and the reason why I asked.
@Bharat Jhunjhunwala
I went to the book Common Prophets to see about this. Please see screenshots. I focus on the name Girivraja, which's far east yet will be the location of west for Mohenjo Daro. And it's due to finding names in 500 BCE. So transpose to the location for showing about Rama and Krishna.
(I continue writing more below screenshots)
Mohenjodaro is very much Indian - (Mohana jo dero - The camp of fisherfolk). This is in Sindhi/Multani/Saraiki languages of Pakistan).
The fisherfolk of Indus river are known as Mohanas in Pakistan.
Of course, this was not the actual name of whatever the people of Mohenjodaro and Harappa called their cities as. We do not know that.
@Aupmanyav
I agree Mohenjodaro is very much Indian. However, here's what confuses me: as you
@Aupmanyav were showing about merging, how come here I read this word conquer? Because how to trade when conquering? I thought merging would allow for trading, and that was the reason for merging, am I understanding?
What is this about
@Bharat Jhunjhunwala when using the word conquer; how did trading happen then?
Screenshot