I think the sad thing is that most people who become JWs are probably not conceited, but they are taught to be that way.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
That isn't god dealing with people it is the three elders deciding the fate of them. God plays no role in the the decisions of the judicial committee. Living through my mothers disfellowshipping and reinstatement process, I don't feel that God has anything to do with it. And with my own personal dealing the elders, I see men not God.This is another thing i love about this organisation.... it treats us as individuals because it is God who is dealing with us. He knows us individually and gives us whatever time we need to get back to where we need to be.
This is my assessment of the decision making of Jehovah's Witnesses too. The image that the organization projects is 'a little bit of imperfection in perfection'. But I discovered it was the other way around and it was extremely difficult for awhile to live through that realization.That isn't god dealing with people it is the three elders deciding the fate of them. God plays no role in the the decisions of the judicial committee. Living through my mothers disfellowshipping and reinstatement process, I don't feel that God has anything to do with it. And with my own personal dealing the elders, I see men not God.
Ok then. I think your basic premise is correct. The Bible does actually say don't associate with those who claim to be brothers and are engaged in these sins. I think the JWs have "added" to that, but there is a point where we need not to associate. The Bible says it plainly. But in the assembly, not family.Of course... and the WT is of the same opinion... so whats your issue?
The judicial committee is not scriptural. A man made invention will act as man made.When a person becomes convinced that the men of the governing body were not really appointed by Jesus and that the elders are not really appointed by The Holy Spirit he must become unconvinced or lie to himself and to all other JWs to be able to be welcomed back into the fold. Who would do that? And if someone would do that and be welcome back that is proof positive that The Holy Spirit is not deciding the course of the Jehovah's Witnesses. Lying is worse than disagreeing. I am sure.
They believe it is scriptural. Acts of the Apostles 15:6 I do not agree but that is what they fashion themselves after. They fashion themselves after their understanding of God's Word. 2 Peter 3:3The judicial committee is not scriptural. A man made invention will act as man made.
Really? Did the scriptures talk of a judicial committee or of a meeting?They believe it is scriptural. Acts of the Apostles 15:6 I do not agree but that is what they fashion themselves after. They fashion themselves after their understanding of God's Word. 2 Peter 3:3
Out of the garden, not out of communication.
An example of this "offensive lifestyle" is simply not believing the governing body is anointed by Jehovah. Not believing in such is enough be labeled "wicked", and said to have "become demonized" with "poisonous thinking", thus causing your family to turn their backs on you.Then God is cold too. I am simply reflecting the same attitude of a God who does not wink at wilful practicers of what he condemns. When he says "don't do that" and someone does without a shred of remorse, God does not forgive.
Only when genuine repentance is demonstrated will forgiveness take place. Did you not know this?
I could never disown my own child. What I said was I could not support their lifestyle. That means I could not approve or enable it and stand before my God with a clean conscience. I would certainly do all in my power to talk to them reasonably about it first. I would never hate them, but could rightly hate what they do.
If they were determined to adopt a lifestyle or practices that God condemns then I would leave them to the consequences of their own choices. If God could not condone their choice, why would I? As a parent, I have choices too.
This is what the father in Jesus' parable of the prodigal son did. He did not quibble about the son's decision but gave him what he asked for and let him go. No attempt was made to dissuade him and no contact was made all the time he was living in debauchery and squandering his inheritance. What was it that turned the son around and sent him home? The cold hard reality of what his choice meant for him, made him "come to his senses". Only when he reached rock bottom did he humble himself and return home expecting nothing from his father except to be treated as one of his hired workers. Then and only then, did the father welcome him home.
I did not say I would turn my back on any of my children. I said I would not support a lifestyle choice that offended me or my God. Setting reasonable boundaries is what God expects us to do. But any child who respects the beliefs of their parents will not insist on insulting them by rubbing their noses in something that is abhorrent to them. They surely would leave and live the life they have chosen away from their sight, because that would be the least they could do.
Show me anywhere in scripture where God accepted any worshipper of his who was unrepentantly practicing something they knew was wrong? No repentance means no forgiveness. Sins only get "blotted out" when we leave off doing them.
That isn't god dealing with people it is the three elders deciding the fate of them. God plays no role in the the decisions of the judicial committee. Living through my mothers disfellowshipping and reinstatement process, I don't feel that God has anything to do with it. And with my own personal dealing the elders, I see men not God.
Ok then. I think your basic premise is correct. The Bible does actually say don't associate with those who claim to be brothers and are engaged in these sins. I think the JWs have "added" to that, but there is a point where we need not to associate. The Bible says it plainly. But in the assembly, not family.
To me its evidence that it is not the elders who decide when a person is restored to Jehovahs favor but Jehovah himself who decides.
So that would mean that it was Jehovah that told me I couldn't get baptized because I didn't have enough service time, not the elders. That doesn't sound like the God of the bible to me.
If you got that far as to address baptism questions with the elders and they told you that you have not spent enough time in the ministry to be baptised, what did you do about it?