My first thought is what I’ve discussed before, being fooled and intimidated by others calling your views “unscientific” and “unsupported by evidence,” and their views “science,” “scientific” or “what science says”; demanding evidence for your views; accusing you personally of being “unscientific” and “against science”; and various other ways of using the name, reputation and language of science to stigmatize you for what you believe or don’t believe.
What I’ve learned above all was not to fall into the trap of doing the same thing, myself. It’s like, trying to fight against the dark side can pull you over to it. Or like Sargeras in World of Warcraft going mad and turning against the other Titans, from trying to fight against the demons. I never call my views “science,” “scientific” or “what science says,” and I never call my reasons for my ways of thinking “evidence.”
Part of what I’ve done to avoid being fooled or intimidated by that was to do some investigation into what, precisely, people mean when they call some views “scientific” and others “unscientific,” and what people mean when they call their reasons for thinking what they do “evidence.” Another way has been to do my own research on whatever science people say that I’m denying.