What are your thoughts on Chruch's refusing to wed gays?

[Marisa]

Do you think for one minute you could not mock people Faiths?

What's gonna happen? Lightening bolts and mass smiting?

 

[BenTheBeliever]

What's gonna happen? Lightening bolts and mass smiting?

It is called respect. Ever heard of it?

 

[Nada]

Since when do they do weddings?

Ps.All kidding aside,if the church does not wish to wed them then that is their right to do so per their belief.

 

[Marisa]

It is called respect. Ever heard of it?

Yes I have, but do remember you were the one who insulted me personally 3 times and has yet to deliver any sort of apology or expression of repentance.

We've also already established that you are not able to distinguish between ridicule of your belief, and ridicule of YOU, which would be expressed by calling you things like bitter, sad and angry.

 

[viole]

Do you think for one minute you could not mock people Faiths?

I am not sure what you are talking about. I don't think I mock anything.

If you (and the Gospel) assert that you can move mountains in the name of Jesus, then I simply asked whether you can prove that to me, by moving
Mount Everest to New Jersey. If that is too big for Jesus, I would be also impressed if you can move a lesser mountain, like Mount Sinai, for instance. I think a little hill would do too.

It should be possible, according to the Gospel, so why don't you do it and convert a lot of souls in the process (and test that Jesus listens to you)?

Ciao

- viole

 

[Nada]

@BenTheBeliever ,@Marisa

 

[Marisa]

@BenTheBeliever ,@Marisa

No, because I'm bitter, sad and angry.

 

[Nada]

No, because I'm bitter, sad and angry.

Maybe this will cheer you up.

 

[Marisa]

Maybe this will cheer you up.

I think I'm too sad to be cheered up. Maybe I'll BBQ a baby for dinner tonight. With a nice, bitter rub.

 

[BenTheBeliever]

I am not sure what you are talking about. I don't think I mock anything.

If you (and the Gospel) assert that you can move mountains in the name of Jesus, then I simply asked whether you can prove that to me, by moving
Mount Everest to New Jersey. If that is too big for Jesus, I would be also impressed if you can move a lesser mountain, like Mount Sinai, for instance. I think a little hill would do too.

It should be possible, according to the Gospel, so why don't you do it and convert a lot of souls in the process (and test that Jesus listens to you)?

Ciao

- viole

You are mocking my Faith right there. But whatever.

 

[Nada]

I think I'm too sad to be cheered up. Maybe I'll BBQ a baby for dinner tonight. With a nice, bitter rub.

That sounds really gross. Lol..

I am about to get ready to barbecue myself.I smoked some salmon for my wife earlier.I made a pasta salad too.For dinner I will make barbecued chicken with some baked potatoes.

 

[Marisa]

That sounds really gross. Lol..

I am about to get ready to barbecue myself.I smoked some salmon for my wife earlier.I made a pasta salad too.For dinner I will make barbecued chicken with some baked potatoes.

On second thought, what time should I be at your place? That sound delicious!

 

[viole]

You are mocking my Faith right there. But whatever.

Well, if you (and the Gospel) call mocking the request of showing evidence of one of their claims, then it is your faith that renders itself mockable. In this case,
if you do not want such faith to be ridiculed, I would recommend not to hold any ridiculous faiths.

If you see a guy on the street that claims to be able to fly by flapping his arms, and rejects as mocking any request to provide evidence for his claim, what would you think of him?

Ciao

- viole

 

[SpeaksForTheTrees]

And if the church is comfortable with that, why do you think your opinion matters?

It matters as much as your opinion.

 

[Marisa]

It matters as much as your opinion.

So that would be not at all, right?

 

[Mycroft]

I'm divided on the issue.

One one hand it sucks that the churches act this way, but on the other is forcing them by hanging their tax exemption over them constitutional?

On another hand, why would anyone want to get married in a building whose religion thinks you're an abomination anyway?

 

[SpeaksForTheTrees]

Well, that drops oral sex off too. I suppose to be really strict about it, it should never be unless the woman is during a period of ovulation, since reproduction seems the only legitimate reason for sex. So here's what would therefore be the only acceptable sexual relations:

1. Hetrosexuals only
2. Only during ovulation
3. Only if the woman is in childbearing ages (sex after 40 is out, since it's not about reproduction)
4. Only males who have be shown to be viable may be allowed to have sex. A visit to a fertility clinic is required prior to engaging in any form a sex during the acceptable ages and times of the month with his wife.
5. Only women who are shown to be able to bear children may have sex. A visit to a fertility clinic is require for them as well.

Oh, boy. Thank God that isn't the only real reason to have sex, otherwise, you're all screwed! I guess since sex is engaged in for social reasons, and not just just reproduction, then the door is wide opened. Otherwise, any hetrosexual who engages in sex outside the conditions explained in points 1 - 5, who say it is only for reproduction, are lying hypocrites. There. That settles that.

My gf loves it in all of them but i only do it cos its wrong and dirty thats the turn on uhh.
The thread about the church not our own personal preference.

 

[SpeaksForTheTrees]

I'm divided on the issue.

On another hand, why would anyone want to get married in a building whose religion thinks you're an abomination anyway?

Exactly well said

 

[Marisa]

My gf loves it in all of them but i only do it cos its wrong and dirty thats the turn on uhh.
The thread about the church not our own personal preference.

There's "wrong" because someone will be injured, and there's "wrong" because it will **** off your imaginary friend. I'm only concerned about one of those, and if the other adds spice to your sex life, booya to you.

 

[SpeaksForTheTrees]

There's "wrong" because someone will be injured, and there's "wrong" because it will **** off your imaginary friend. I'm only concerned about one of those, and if the other adds spice to your sex life, booya to you.

Should take that as your opinion means nothing, right?