• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

What are your thoughts on Chruch's refusing to wed gays?

BenTheBeliever

Active Member
Probably. What attitude are you detecting?
An attitudes toward the church which is really the body of Christ. I met a lot of people who have attitudes toward the church and it is a pet peeve of mine cause the body of Christ are truly not bad people just like non Christians are not bad people
 

Muffled

Jesus in me
Should church's be punished for refusing to marry gays by loosing tax exempt status?
I post a while back that this might happen in order to force Church's to perform
weddings for gay couples and if I recall I took a lot of flack for even suggesting
such a thing could happen.

Well read this.

Churches Who Refuse Same Sex Weddings Could Lose Tax Exempt Status – Downtrend


Churches Who Refuse Same Sex Weddings Could Lose Tax Exempt Status
Now that same-sex marriage is the law of the land, there’s a very good chance that churches who refuse to perform gay weddings could lose their tax-exempt status.

The Daily Caller is reporting that in his dissent, Chief Justice John Roberts warned as much.

“Hard questions arise when people of faith exercise religion in ways that may be seen to conflict with the new right to same-sex marriage — when, for example, a religious college provides married student housing only to opposite-sex married couples, or a religious adoption agency declines to place children with same-sex married couples,” Roberts wrote.



“Indeed, the Solicitor General candidly acknowledged that the tax exemptions of some religious institutions would be in question if they opposed same-sex marriage There is little doubt that these and similar questions will soon be before this Court. Unfortunately, people of faith can take no comfort in the treatment they receive from the majority today.”

It’s inconceivable that a Catholic Church – or any house of worship – could be forced to perform gay marriages, even if their religion prohibits it. And if they don’t, they could lose their status as a “church.”

Is this unintended consequences, or was it liberal, gay-rights advocates’ intention to destroy the institution of religion too?


Thoughts?

I believe it would go to court. Either the government will have to eliminate tax exemption for all non-profit enterprises or face court action saying that religious institutions are being discriminated against.
 

Muffled

Jesus in me
Tax exemption restrictions should not be tied onto the marriage equality issue. I think that tax exemption should only apply to churches who use a certain percentage of earnings to reinvest in communities or charities.

I personally would not expect churches to marry my partner and I. If I wanted to get married in a church, I would go to one that will do it. You wouldnt want to get married in a church that is anti gay. Talk about awkward.

I believe one may call it marriage if one wishes but I never will no matter where it happens.
 

Muffled

Jesus in me
How many Orthodox Jewish synagogues allow their rabbis to marry Jews and Gentiles? And of those who do not, how many have lost their tax exemption status?

They should not (and will not) lose their tax exemption status for refusing to allow religious ceremonies that violate their religious beliefs. Similarly, they will not be required to employ gays in ministerial positions. This stuff is all a red herring. The real question is can they continue as educational institutions, hospitals and adoption agencies while imposing these restrictions? I think the answer to that should be no. Those receive direct federal funding in the form of student loans, medicare, etc.

I believe we have already seen Obama attack Catholic institutions so it is not far fetched to believe the government could attack any religious institution. Will the supreme court allow it? That remains to be seen. Lately the Supreme court has been anything but constitutional and it wouldn't suprise me if that continued.
 

Marisa

Well-Known Member
An attitudes toward the church which is really the body of Christ. I met a lot of people who have attitudes toward the church and it is a pet peeve of mine cause the body of Christ are truly not bad people just like non Christians are not bad people
So you are pissed, it's okay to admit that. But here's the thing, in every reply to you I have taken great measure to make sure you understand that I don't think you or most christians are bad people, but you can't give me any points for that. You're demanding something from me I'm giving you but still faulting me for not giving it the way you'd rather have it.
 

BenTheBeliever

Active Member
So you are pissed, it's okay to admit that. But here's the thing, in every reply to you I have taken great measure to make sure you understand that I don't think you or most christians are bad people, but you can't give me any points for that. You're demanding something from me I'm giving you but still faulting me for not giving it the way you'd rather have it.
Once again I am not pissed off. But it is OK if you think I am. In that sense you seem like a bitter person inside like a lot of other people I have met on line who don't like God and want to blame the church for stuff.
 

Marisa

Well-Known Member
Once again I am not pissed off. But it is OK if you think I am. In that sense you seem like a bitter person inside like a lot of other people I have met on line who don't like God and want to blame the church for stuff.
I'm unfriendly and bitter. Why do you feel the need to keep attacking me personally if you aren't pissed off at me? Aside from telling you that I completely respect religion (which isn't going to happen), what do you need to hear from me to understand that I have more respect for you than it appears you have for me?
 

BenTheBeliever

Active Member
I'm unfriendly and bitter. Why do you feel the need to keep attacking me personally if you aren't pissed off at me? Aside from telling you that I completely respect religion (which isn't going to happen), what do you need to hear from me to understand that I have more respect for you than it appears you have for me?


It is how you seem to approach these subjects that got me saying this. You seem to be a bitter person. That is how you come across on your replies to me. Just like i come across as pissed off to you. I seem pissed off to you and you seem bitter to me. We are both doing the same thing about the other person
 

Marisa

Well-Known Member
It is how you seem to approach these subjects that got me saying this. You seem to be a bitter person. That is how you come across on your replies to me. Just like i come across as pissed off to you. I seem pissed off to you and you seem bitter to me. We are both doing the same thing about the other person
I can accept that as a possibility. Though I would point out that I wasn't the one who opened with personal attacks. I think it's probably more true that my opinion of your belief system makes you uncomfortable, and being uncomfortable makes you a bit angry. Nevertheless, I will simply say that my being bitter at something I don't believe in is a brand of silly that I simply don't partake in. I don't give religion much consideration one way or another until it attempts to insert itself into my life, which is far too often. My goal in being here on the forum is to hopefully change the kneejerk reaction many atheists receive when believers discover we have no faith. I won't be idiotic enough to say that no atheist is "mad at god" because I personally know some who are. It's not me, though. In turn, I would hope that you could be honest enough to say that there are many religious folk who find the disbelief of others personally challenging, and as we get to know each other we can figure out how much of these "truths" apply to each other. Despite the fact that you've insulted me at a personal level twice now, I still respect you. I get that you have little respect for me, though.
 

BenTheBeliever

Active Member
I can accept that as a possibility. Though I would point out that I wasn't the one who opened with personal attacks. I think it's probably more true that my opinion of your belief system makes you uncomfortable, and being uncomfortable makes you a bit angry. Nevertheless, I will simply say that my being bitter at something I don't believe in is a brand of silly that I simply don't partake in. I don't give religion much consideration one way or another until it attempts to insert itself into my life, which is far too often. My goal in being here on the forum is to hopefully change the kneejerk reaction many atheists receive when believers discover we have no faith. I won't be idiotic enough to say that no atheist is "mad at god" because I personally know some who are. It's not me, though. In turn, I would hope that you could be honest enough to say that there are many religious folk who find the disbelief of others personally challenging, and as we get to know each other we can figure out how much of these "truths" apply to each other. Despite the fact that you've insulted me at a personal level twice now, I still respect you. I get that you have little respect for me, though.


I will always be the first to admit there are hateful Christians out there. I have met more then a few. I have been judge as well by some cause i dress in black even in the summer time and i love to listen to rock music both Christian and secular and i love slasher flicks and movies like American Pie. I am just me. I also know that the church is not a bad place. The body of Christ or those who truly love God and love people are not bad people. In fact most Christians who are truly born again of the spirit and are letting him dwell in their hearts will be the first to admit they are less then perfect. That is why we got grace. Of course what do i know i am a horror freak, rock loving preacher who does not fit in the regular mold of what sunday school Christians are like and about.
 

Marisa

Well-Known Member
I will always be the first to admit there are hateful Christians out there. I have met more then a few. I have been judge as well by some cause i dress in black even in the summer time and i love to listen to rock music both Christian and secular and i love slasher flicks and movies like American Pie. I am just me. I also know that the church is not a bad place. The body of Christ or those who truly love God and love people are not bad people. In fact most Christians who are truly born again of the spirit and are letting him dwell in their hearts will be the first to admit they are less then perfect. That is why we got grace. Of course what do i know i am a horror freak, rock loving preacher who does not fit in the regular mold of what sunday school Christians are like and about.
And I would return with having sat in a church, listening to a mass in honor of my husband's grandparent's 65th wedding anniversary, listening the priest proclaim what a wonderful thing it was that jesus said if you aren't willing to give up everything you own and you're whole family, you aren't worthy of him. IMO, that's probably just slightly above "I hope you burn in hell" in terms of congratulatory sentiments.

I already know that none of us are perfect. I just don't subscribe to the theory than one man could have died and "redeemed" us all, it makes zero sense to me. But I would correct you, people are good and people are bad with and without truly loving god. Being a believer doesn't make you a good person, being a good person makes you a good person.
 

BenTheBeliever

Active Member
And I would return with having sat in a church, listening to a mass in honor of my husband's grandparent's 65th wedding anniversary, listening the priest proclaim what a wonderful thing it was that jesus said if you aren't willing to give up everything you own and you're whole family, you aren't worthy of him. IMO, that's probably just slightly above "I hope you burn in hell" in terms of congratulatory sentiments.

I already know that none of us are perfect. I just don't subscribe to the theory than one man could have died and "redeemed" us all, it makes zero sense to me. But I would correct you, people are good and people are bad with and without truly loving god. Being a believer doesn't make you a good person, being a good person makes you a good person.



Faith is often something that a lot of people have struggles with. The world will say no you can't do this and God can't do that but in God's world we can do all things through Christ. We can learn to speak to those moutains and tell them to move. We can learn to pray over the sick and see them healed. We can learn to walk by Faith and not by sight and we can learn to love the world as Christ loves us
 

Marisa

Well-Known Member
Faith is often something that a lot of people have struggles with. The world will say no you can't do this and God can't do that but in God's world we can do all things through Christ. We can learn to speak to those moutains and tell them to move. We can learn to pray over the sick and see them healed. We can learn to walk by Faith and not by sight and we can learn to love the world as Christ loves us
Why didn't god heal my friends baby when she prayed faithfully? Don't give me your "god's divine plan" platitude which does nothing more than indicate you haven't fully grasped what I'm asking.

One: It's utterly horrifying that god is so impotent that his "divine plan" includes dead babies.
Two: It's demonstrably false, which is what I just demonstrated, that if you pray god will heal. My friend prayed, her baby was not healed.
 

BenTheBeliever

Active Member
Why didn't god heal my friends baby when she prayed faithfully? Don't give me your "god's divine plan" platitude which does nothing more than indicate you haven't fully grasped what I'm asking.

One: It's utterly horrifying that god is so impotent that his "divine plan" includes dead babies.
Two: It's demonstrably false, which is what I just demonstrated, that if you pray god will heal. My friend prayed, her baby was not healed.


I don't have an answer to give you. All i can is things do happen for a reason and perhaps God took that baby cause maybe he wanted to keep the baby from hurting. Life happens. Death happens. Death will happen to each of us one day. All we can do is let God have our hurts. I know people who lose babies and instead of letting it destory them they turned it around and used what they been through to help others who are hurting and been through the same thing.
 

ADigitalArtist

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
Isn't marrying a couple a type of business? I know when I married my ex, we had to pay that priest to do so and pay him to counsel us before that marriage as that was a part of the process at the time. If that priest benefits monetarily, that is a business, IMO and should therefore be considered a part of the anti-discrimination laws.

Depends on how much money the priest is making. You're allowed to get paid for service or product under a certain threshold before it must be registered under a business and taxed accordingly. That's why a lot of arts and crafts people on sites like Etsy don't have a business. Just independent (and infrequent) sales.
But above that threshold, I agree.
 

Katzpur

Not your average Mormon
How then do they operate these storehouses, etc? What revenue do they have that keeps them running? Either they own the buildings or they rent them and if that is the case, where does those monies come from? And who pays the farmers? Etc.
The funds would mostly come from member contributions, in the form of tithing. We have no paid clergy, but we do give 10% of our income to the Church. This money doesn't support our bishops, etc. as they hold full-time jobs outside of the church (as doctors, teachers, carpenters, etc.). Instead it goes to fund the storehouses, etc.
 

columbus

yawn <ignore> yawn
Depends on how much money the priest is making.
At the churches I know about the cost is pretty minimal and doesn't do much more than cover expenses. A couple who really don't have any money are not going to be turned away. Couples who do have it usually give because they want to give. It's more like a voluntary sliding scale, but the Church isn't going to turn it down.
Tom
 

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
Should church's be punished for refusing to marry gays by loosing tax exempt status?
I post a while back that this might happen in order to force Church's to perform
weddings for gay couples and if I recall I took a lot of flack for even suggesting
such a thing could happen.

Well read this.

Churches Who Refuse Same Sex Weddings Could Lose Tax Exempt Status – Downtrend


Churches Who Refuse Same Sex Weddings Could Lose Tax Exempt Status
Now that same-sex marriage is the law of the land, there’s a very good chance that churches who refuse to perform gay weddings could lose their tax-exempt status.

The Daily Caller is reporting that in his dissent, Chief Justice John Roberts warned as much.

“Hard questions arise when people of faith exercise religion in ways that may be seen to conflict with the new right to same-sex marriage — when, for example, a religious college provides married student housing only to opposite-sex married couples, or a religious adoption agency declines to place children with same-sex married couples,” Roberts wrote.



“Indeed, the Solicitor General candidly acknowledged that the tax exemptions of some religious institutions would be in question if they opposed same-sex marriage There is little doubt that these and similar questions will soon be before this Court. Unfortunately, people of faith can take no comfort in the treatment they receive from the majority today.”

It’s inconceivable that a Catholic Church – or any house of worship – could be forced to perform gay marriages, even if their religion prohibits it. And if they don’t, they could lose their status as a “church.”

Is this unintended consequences, or was it liberal, gay-rights advocates’ intention to destroy the institution of religion too?


Thoughts?
Scaremongering. There's just as much legitimate worry that anti-gay churches will be forced to marry same-sex couples as there is that anti-divorced churches will be forced to marry divorced people.

That being said, I think that getting rid of special tax status for churches is a good idea. If a church can qualify for charitable status like a legitimate charity, fine... but if it can't, it shouldn't get the special exemption that exists now.

... and the special perks that only churches and their employees get (e.g. the clergy housing allowance) are completely unjustified, IMO.

... though this is all separate from the question of same-sex marriage.
 

SpeaksForTheTrees

Well-Known Member
How can the church ever marry a couple in the eyes of God that actively involve in the act of buggery(Sodomy) I'm real sorry but this is the reality.
 
Top