M
Majikthise
Guest
Taking away even more of my assets and freedoms.
Rampant socialistic policies.
Rampant socialistic policies.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
What Changes Does Obama Stand For?
- Thread starter Sunstone
- Start date
Could you be more specific? It seems the current administration has a corner on taking away freedom and assets.
M
Majikthise
Guest
I live in Mass, the dems would have my soul if they could get it.
As far as freedom is concerned , the current administration does not have the supreme court or congress socked up.
I live in Mass, the dems would have my soul if they could get it.
As far as freedom is concerned , the current administration does not have the supreme court or congress socked up.
Which is a good thing.
M
Majikthise
Guest
Depends what you like.
That's true. The current administration is equivalent to S&M. Not my thing.
M
Majikthise
Guest
Fuzzy handcuffs are better than the real kind I'll be wearing if I get caught taking a stroll on the beach were piping plovers are nesting.
Nemesis_of_3vil
Member
1.) raising taxes
2.) bankrupting America
3.) loosing a war
Sound good? thought not,
2.) bankrupting America
3.) loosing a war
Sound good? thought not,
kai
ragamuffin
what! he is going to raise tax, loose you a war and bankrupt you and people are still voting for him?
Alceste
Vagabond
So you prefer a president that lowers taxes while bankrupting America and letting a war loose.
Apex
Somewhere Around Nothing
I don't see much difference.
As to the changes Obama keeps preaching about, Ive said it before, Ill believe 'em when I see 'em. I do not have faith in any politician.
Nemesis_of_3vil
Member
Obama is a liberal, and they are obsessed with raising taxes, McCain may flip-flop but he likely won't. McCain supports the war, and Iraq is FAR safer today then 6 years ago, go and ask patraeus. A universal healthcare would very quickly banrapt the U.S. even if it didn't how is he going to get all this money for healthcare for everyone? raise taxes.
I don't think its right that you recieve healthcare if your some government leech not paying taxes and working. Theyre is no such thing as true "bum" anymore, there are tones of halfway homes and such for them to get their lives straight, they just dont want to becuase ther are on drugs or something.
tomspug
Absorbant
No one ever stops to think about the fact that it's Congress's fault that our budget is so high and not the President's. They also don't think about the fact that the war would have probably been over sooner were it not for Congress fighting tooth and nail to remove funding for it (inevitably extending the war and causing more soldier casualties).
Autodidact
Intentionally Blank
McCain was opposed to the tax cuts until he decided to run for President. That is called pandering.
"I don't want tax increases. But that doesn't mean that anything is off the table."
- John McCain
Safer for who? Certainly not the Iraqis.
It certainly wouldn't bankrupt the United States especially if the fools in Congress stop wasting untold billions on pet projects, pork spending, and the colossal failure/money pit that is the WOT.
"War On Terror"
Autodidact
Intentionally Blank
Well, you're probably right, electing Republicans to Congress is at least as bad as for President. That four-year period with a Republican Congress and President nearly bankrupted us.
Because of all those votes when Congress denied funding for the war? Those non-existent votes, you mean?
It cracks me up when, after laying the biggest egg in American history, Republicans try to blame it on the Democrats. One more reason not to vote for them: failure to take responsibility.
Autodidact
Intentionally Blank
How about not starting the war in the first place, Nemesis? Whose idea was this war, anyhow?