They were acting according to convention. My problem is with those who have a problem with that.
Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us: for it is written, Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree:
Paul's use of this 'curse' is just not right. The theology he imparts to it is a joke. The idea that someone can basically be a human sacrifice and take the sins on others and so on is so alien to Tanach it is absurd.
1) I see. Thanks for clearing that up! I knew something didn’t sound right.
2a) Paul is referring to “curse” not in terms of 5be law, itself, but in terms of what the law brings, i.e.
condemnation. Paul corroborates this in other places.
2b) yeah, I’m no fan of Substitutionary Atonement either. There are better constructs out there. But I don’t think the passage refers to substitutionary atonementment. Christ’s sacrifice was a
self sacrifice. One who is cursed (through legal definition), hangs. One is judged guilty by a court or magistrate. Pilate (magistrate) did not curse Jesus. The implication is that Jesus could have saved himself, but he did not, in effect, cursing himself, so that we (humanity) would not be held accountable for cursing him. IOW, one layer of meaning might be that, as we can become entrapped by legalities that don’t serve us, so Jesus allowed himself to become entrapped, in order to absolve us from entrapment.
Hope I’m making sense here.