• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

What do people think "atheist" means?

ThePainefulTruth

Romantic-Cynic
So basically, you dislike the the word atheist being used for someone who merely lacks a belief in god because you are to lazy to keep the definitions straight?

Whine all you like.
The fact is that someone who lacks a belief in god is an atheist.

Absolutely correct. And so is someone who disbelieves in God. They/you try to jump from one to the other in order to confuse the issue when there's no difference. Keep at it if you want, but more and more. LCDers are catching on--even the "dumbest".

Since when?

Since forever. Maybe I should have specified rationally deduced morality, thought that was obvious, since what else is there.? If you disagree, what should morality be based on?
 

Cephus

Relentlessly Rational
If it's knowledge, it's past tense.

Edit: What I mean is, if it's knowledge then it's already true. If it has no truth value, such that it has to be demonstrated, then it's not knowledge.

Yet there are a lot of people who claim to have knowledge that has no demonstrated truth value, in particular, when it comes to religion. If it's not demonstrated, it's not knowledge, no matter how much they wish it was.
 

Willamena

Just me
Premium Member
Yet there are a lot of people who claim to have knowledge that has no demonstrated truth value, in particular, when it comes to religion. If it's not demonstrated, it's not knowledge, no matter how much they wish it was.
Good for them. Doesn't work for me.
 

Desert Snake

Veteran Member
But only so far as that knowledge can actually be externally demonstrated. Just having an unsupported belief that your so-called knowledge is true doesn't actually make it true and claiming that's how it works is painfully circular.
Agreed.:thumbsup:
Actually I think you mean , claiming that your so called knowledge, is proof of truth; but close enough.
 

`mud

Just old
Premium Member
Who are these people talking about ?
Being aware of one's end, or fearing it ?
It means not worshipping imagined fantasies.
That's all it means !
~
`mud .
 

Kartari

Active Member
Hi Legion,

How many words in any language refer to "quite simply" a lack of belief in anything? Virtually none. There are no words for lack of belief in unicorns, lack of belief in elves, lack of belief in biomedical model of psychiatry, lack of belief in quantum consciousness, lack of belief in stupid asinine assertions made by ignorant members of online discussion boards (such as yours truly), etc. Why the special treatment for atheism?

A very good point. However, I propose that there is a practical need in a world such as ours, where theism holds a far more prominent place in society than the belief in unicorns, etc.
 

LegionOnomaMoi

Veteran Member
Premium Member
A very good point. However, I propose that there is a practical need in a world such as ours, where theism holds a far more prominent place in society than the belief in unicorns, etc.
There is never a need for a word to describe a belief you lack if this is understood to be different from not believing (agnostic) or disbelieving (atheist). One cannot logically or physiologically lack a belief in a concept one is capable of verbalizing. The ability to use the word "theism" or "god" changes the patterns of neural activity in your brain that we do not find to be true of e.g., infants.
 
Top