Augustus
…
What about the theists who lack belief in their gods
Or the theists who lack belief in atheism?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
What about the theists who lack belief in their gods
How is it possible to lack belief in "atheism"? "Atheism" is a state of being.Or the theists who lack belief in atheism?
How is it possible to lack belief in "atheism"? "Atheism" is a state of being.
Not sure what this means, but I assume it was at my expense.Replace with the sound of a slide whistle.
Because I do actually disagree with how many commonly seem to define theism. Namely, that they seem to conflate theism with classical monotheism, or theism as requiring particular god-attributes common to classical monotheism (i.e., conflating theism with supernaturalism), or that theism is necessarily a matter of belief (a similar problem of which plagues atheism, I hear), among other oddities. I think my other favorite has to be conflating theism with religion.
Gnosticism deals with knowledge. So maybe you could say a Gnostic theist.I'd agree if that word "believes" wasn't in there. Why not a word like "knows?" Or "accepts?" Or "feels?" What if it isn't particularly a "belief" to them?
Not sure what this means, but I assume it was at my expense. But, are you saying that there are theists that don't believe that atheism exists? What you essentially said was "theists that don't believe in the lack of belief in the existence of God or gods."
Hang on. In out other discussions atheism is defined as the lack of belief. That translates to lack of state of being. Belief is a state. Lack of said state would be stateless. Can you explain that "state of being"? What state would it be?How is it possible to lack belief in "atheism"? "Atheism" is a state of being.
The state of not believing in deities is a state of being. It is the state of being without theism.Hang on. In out other discussions atheism is defined as the lack of belief. That translates to lack of state of being. Belief is a state. Lack of said state would be stateless. Can you explain that "state of being"? What state would it be?
Good. I do agree with you. Which is why the "lack of" phrase is somewhat misleading and misused by some atheists. And that's the reason why I suspect more authoritative dictionaries say "unbelief" rather than "lack of."The state of not believing in deities is a state of being. It is the state of being without theism.
I stumbled upon a referent for "god" accidentally, so I'm probably the last person to offer up authoritative definition. "Theist," as Kilgore Trout pointed out, is simply theism with the suffix switched up to "ist" to represent the person who practices or is concerned with the subject "ism."Although there is all sorts of arguing and controversy about what "atheist" means, a similar fervor is not had over what "theist" means. Similar problems plague both of these imprecise terms, yet only one of these two has been argued about on RF to the point of nausea. While I don't find this surprising, I do find it rather odd. Thus, I think it's high time to start arguing about what "theism" means. So what are you waiting for?
I never said that I agreed with this. I don't think that it is misleading at all. Lacking belief in the existence of God is not the same as saying that one actively believes that God does not exist. There is a very good reason why the "lack of" is a part of most dictionary definitions, as "atheism" includes those who don't believe either propositions. They find it silly to believe in the existence of God, but also find it silly to jump to the conclusion that God does not exist for the same reason.Good. I do agree with you. Which is why the "lack of" phrase is somewhat misleading and misused by some atheists. And that's the reason why I suspect more authoritative dictionaries say "unbelief" rather than "lack of."