• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

What Do You Think About Heterosexuality?

Hope

Princesinha
Jensa said:
Not really. There's always adoption, surrogate mothers, sperm donors...

Nothing a little ingenuity can't solve.
Yes, but it doesn't relate to the point TheJedi was making. :p Two homosexuals, on their very own, cannot produce children. It always requires outside help. Therefore, unlike a heterosexual relationship, it is indeed impractical when it comes to reproduction. No beating around the bush---I'm just sayin' it like it is. :)
 

Sunstone

De Diablo Del Fora
Premium Member
I agree with Fluffy! How come no one castigates bisexuals for their secret agenda? How come it's only homosexuals we castigate? I'm going to write to James Dobson right away asking him to rectify this grave injustice.
 

michel

Administrator Emeritus
Staff member
Sunstone said:
I agree with Fluffy! How come no one castigates bisexuals for their secret agenda? How come it's only homosexuals we castigate? I'm going to write to James Dobson right away asking him to rectify this grave injustice.
I'm not castigating anyone - I promise; anyway, I understand it is an extremely painful procedure...:eek:

Hope said:
Yes, but it doesn't relate to the point TheJedi was making. :p Two homosexuals, on their very own, cannot produce children. It always requires outside help. Therefore, unlike a heterosexual relationship, it is indeed impractical when it comes to reproduction. No beating around the bush---I'm just sayin' it like it is. :)

I agree with what you are saying - there is no doubt that you are right. I would make the point, however that many heterosexual couples choose not to have children; in that aspect, there is little difference, surely ?:)
 

Sunstone

De Diablo Del Fora
Premium Member
I think heterosexuality is fine as long as it's accompanied by sexual panic and hysteria. Somehow, a lack of sexual panic and hysteria in a heterosexual just seems wrong. It's as if the heterosexual is thumbing their nose at today's predominant culture and saying something snotty along the lines of "Sexual hysteria might be good and fine for most of today's heterosexuals, but I'm above that." And who wants someone who's above today's predominant culture?
 

Hope

Princesinha
michel said:
I would make the point, however that many heterosexual couples choose not to have children; in that aspect, there is little difference, surely ?:)
Wel-l-l....there is a slight difference, michel. ( I'd put a winking smilie here, but, alas, it has disappeared!!does anyone know why the winking smilie is gone? I'm sooo disappointed, as it is one of my favorites! )

Anyways, where was I? Ok, the difference... I italicized the word 'always' in my previous statement to indicate this difference. Indeed, many heterosexual couples choose not to have children, or are unable to, due to infertility or other problems---however, if these physical problems are resolved, or the couple changes their minds, nothing prevents them from reproducing. I feel as if I am pointing out the sky is blue, or 2+2=4, or something equally obvious. Lol. Regardless of wanting children or not, or infertility problems or not, homosexual couples can never have children without outside help. That is the difference. Humans, biologically, and anatomically, cannot reproduce unless it is with someone of the opposite sex. That is all I was trying to say. :p
 

Quoth The Raven

Half Arsed Muse
I think it's obvious that there's a secret heterosexual agenda. I also think heterosexual marriage is directly contributing to the breakdown of the family and increased divorce rates.
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
Heterosexuals are an ecological menace. I lay the overpopulation problem solely at their feet.
I lay the overpopulation problem at the feet of heterosexuals who think there rabbits when there reproducing.
I think both homosexuals and heterosexuals are ok. Im heterosexual, but I couldn't hate someone just because of a different sexual preference.
 
The ONLY WAY humans can reproduce is with a man and a woman. Homosexuals simply cannot reproduce, and it is for this reason that I think heterosexuality is completely immoral. Don't make the overpopulation problem worse, folks: play it safe, and avoid heterosexual sex. Just because it's enjoyable DOESN'T make it okay.
 

Sunstone

De Diablo Del Fora
Premium Member
lady_lazarus said:
I also think heterosexual marriage is directly contributing to the breakdown of the family and increased divorce rates.
It's true! It's no coincidence at all that every single heterosexual divorce begins with a heterosexual marriage! QED: Heterosexual marriage is the direct cause of heterosexual divorce.
 
Heterosexuality is an Abomination! (how does that feel?)

TheJedi said:
heterosexuality is vital to the continual growth of the human race, and all other creatures on this planet. Its much more... practical, than homosexuality

Maybe i've been reading too many strange novels and books, but what difference would it make if the human race did start declining? What difference would it make to anyone (or God for that matter) if the human race all grew old, didn't procreate and stopped all together? Strange thought, but oh well.



I'm quite sure that if only Homosexuals and Lesbians existed that the human race would still grow (just slower... which isn't a bad thing).

But back on the subject.

Sometimes I see Heterosexuals as being... well, LUCKY. Every single day, no matter where I walk, I see Heterosexual couples holding hands or kissing lightly in the street or park. Guess I'm a little jelious that I can't do that with my partner and not get bashed up.

However! A few examples below about why i'm glad i'm not heterosexual.

Straight Night Clubs that i've been too have been all about S*X (putting another notch on the bed post), all about impressing the Ladies, all about "Pickup Lines", (if you're a lady) it's all about wearing as little as possible and being as un-comfortable as possible in their tiny shoes or in skimpy dresses in mid Winter.

Straight men have to dress, well, BORINGLY! (if that's a word) in most cases. A lot of straight clubs, you can't even get into if you're wearing something other than a white button up shirt. For the men, it's quite difficult to be "Original" or "Unique" in this kind of scene.

It's not completely on topic, and I can't really think of anything biblicle to say at this point of time... But that's all I could think of regarding heterosexuals.
 

CaptainXeroid

Following Christ
What Do You Think About Heterosexuality? Since I didn't choose to be it, truthfully, I don't think about it much. I'm not a porn star, so sexual activity is not the focal point in my life. Besides that, it's nobody's business but mine and my partner's.;) If anything were to happen to her, God forbid, I would not concume myself with the pursuit of 'sexual conquests' or finding another partner right away.

BTW...:D...my wife & I don't have any kids and have never really tried to or tried not to. If it's the Lord's will, we would welcome a child, but we're not going to anguish over possible infertility nor spend thousands of dollars on artificial means. Does that make us "bad" heterosexuals?
 
Top