What do you think about religious fanatics?

[female11]

If anybody still does not know, what is hidden behind a religious fanatic, please, watch the movie in the link:
Zeitgeist - The Movie, 2007
This movie is a very good and interesting documentary, about what really hides behind the religion. What do you think?

 

[astarath]

Seen it, nothing new. As always an ounce of truth or a simple association and all christians are expected to denounce in a flash. God is greater than this. Zeitgheist is about control
Christ is about love and freedom.

 

[farfignewton]

You know, every faith has its fanatics. The extreemest muslims, who see blowing up buildings as a holy calling. The radical Christians who belive shouting from street corners is a way to recruit. The self proclaimed faithless athiests, whos very lack of faith is practiced like a doctranated religion, petitioning to get churches shut down, or keep children from bringing religious books to school.

You cant judge an entire religion by the acts of a few. Same as you can not judge the quality of a race by the acts of a few. It is called profiling, and no matter the reason, it is wrong. Stop trying to disprove others beliefs, and start living your own.

 

[astarath]

You know, every faith has its fanatics. The extreemest muslims, who see blowing up buildings as a holy calling. The radical Christians who belive shouting from street corners is a way to recruit. The self proclaimed faithless athiests, whos very lack of faith is practiced like a doctranated religion, petitioning to get churches shut down, or keep children from bringing religious books to school.

You cant judge an entire religion by the acts of a few. Same as you can not judge the quality of a race by the acts of a few. It is called profiling, and no matter the reason, it is wrong. Stop trying to disprove others beliefs, and start living your own.

Some points, a little bit harsh. A believe female was just interested in opinions. She wasnt making any personal convictions.

 

[female11]

Some points, a little bit harsh. A believe female was just interested in opinions. She wasnt making any personal convictions.

Yes! You are right! I am interested in the opinions of other members about the documentary that I think that is very interesting. And I don´t believe that the information is false. I only would wish to know, what you think about the information of the documentary. But I have not making personal convictions.

 

[Shadow Wolf]

Anyone care to summarize for those of us on dialup?

 

[astarath]

nothing to sum up really hasnt gotten started. Check OP and start new thought

 

[yossarian22]

You cant judge an entire religion by the acts of a few. Same as you can not judge the quality of a race by the acts of a few.

If your ideology can be used to justify acts of violence, there is something wrong with your ideology.

 

[astarath]

Or your perception of right and wrong is skewed, or you have merely been taught to spout that drivel from a teacher in faith. To ascribe to a religious denomination is to be accountable for it;s actions and decisions!

 

[Azakel]

There's at lest two other threads talking about this already. And all I have to say about this is, they no nothing of the mythology they use in the video.

 

[zenzero]

Friend Female,
Religious fanatics?
Religion is only a path/way/etc.
If one is really travelling on a path; how can one be a fanatic about that path/way? As we all know that there are many roads leading to Rome.
Its not religion.
Its the human mind, which is hyponitised etc.
Only when the mind is silent does one become religious.
What one sees around is only a reflection of his mind, what he likes to see.
So many things are happening around you but you see only that you are conditioned by your mind to see, similarly those who are fanatics of any kind.
Once the mind is silenced then life is seen dynamically all around and the individual is no more an
* I * he is a part of that and he does not see he becomes a part of that.
Love & rgds

 

[farfignewton]

If your ideology can be used to justify acts of violence, there is something wrong with your ideology.

So, by your own words, every ideology on the planet is wrong. Any form of beliefs, convictions, ideology and faith can be twisted in order to suit a persons own wants and desires. I don’t believe that a religion is to blame for even the most decrepit and violent acts, only the people that commit them. All faiths of the world teach a form of peace and kindness, a fellowship with your fellow man. It is the fanatics that believe that others must be eradicated, not the general doctrines to which they adhere.

*sorry... that sounded harsher than I ment it to...*

 

[tomspug]

If your ideology can be used to justify acts of violence, there is something wrong with your ideology.

Hitler used genetics to justify the destruction of the Jews. Does that mean science is evil?

 

[logician]

. All faiths of the world teach a form of peace and kindness, a fellowship with your fellow man.

Certainly a questionable statement, I would say the focus on most is to attain eternal life of some form or another, NOT peace and fellowship on this earth. Even Jesus supposedly said "I come not to bring peace, but to bring a sword"

 

[Risen One]

I saw zietgiest a few months ago, and it just compares God with mytholigies but anybody that prays to God and gets thier prayers answered knows the truth!

 

[Don Penguinoini]

You know, every faith has its fanatics

Dear friend, where does hinduism play a part in this? I'd appreciate if you didn't over-generalise.

 

[farfignewton]

Certainly a questionable statement, I would say the focus on most is to attain eternal life of some form or another, NOT peace and fellowship on this earth. Even Jesus supposedly said "I come not to bring peace, but to bring a sword"

Matthew 10
32. "Whoever acknowledges me before men, I will also acknowledge him before my Father in heaven.
33. But whoever disowns me before men, I will disown him before my Father in heaven.
34. "Do not suppose that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I did not come to bring peace, but a sword.
35. For I have come to turn a man against his father, a daughter against her mother, a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law--
36. a man's enemies will be the members of his own household.'
37. "Anyone who loves his father or mother more than me is not worthy of me; anyone who loves his son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me;
38. and anyone who does not take his cross and follow me is not worthy of me.
39. Whoever finds his life will lose it, and whoever loses his life for my sake will find it.
40. "He who receives you receives me, and he who receives me receives the one who sent me.
41. Anyone who receives a prophet because he is a prophet will receive a prophet's reward, and anyone who receives a righteous man because he is a righteous man will receive a righteous man's reward.
42. And if anyone gives even a cup of cold water to one of these little ones because he is my disciple, I tell you the truth, he will certainly not lose his reward."

This is refering to a spiritual battle, the pining of traditional Hebrew beliefs agains the rising folowers of Christ. Remember that when Jesus spoke, he was often refering of the "sword" to mean truth.

Dear friend, where does hinduism play a part in this? I'd appreciate if you didn't over-generalise.

All you have to do is take a look at the troops on the Indian/Pakasine border, and remember the lands of Kashmir to answer that question. The Hindu and the Muslim have been waring for as long as the Muslim and Jewish religions have. I dont want to offend, but my point is that the people, not the religion, are usualy the ones starting the conflicts.

 

[yossarian22]

Hitler used genetics to justify the destruction of the Jews. Does that mean science is evil?

Please...
He used flawed science to support his claims. He warped an ideology into something different.
Also, genetics is not an ideology

So, by your own words, every ideology on the planet is wrong. Any form of beliefs, convictions, ideology and faith can be twisted in order to suit a persons own wants and desires.

Show me how a message of peace and tolerance can be used to justify an act of violence. I cannot think of any.

 

[farfignewton]

Show me how a message of peace and tolerance can be used to justify an act of violence. I cannot think of any.

Easy.

Lets take Martin Luthor King JR, as he is was an advocate for peace that most people can agree on.

He wanted people to look at eachother and call each other brother, regardless of skin color. This is a noble goal, and it convicted people of all creeds to further embrase their fellow man for what he is. Now, if there was a group that heard him speak, and misunderstood, they could easly take it to mean eradicate those who have no tollerance. *black panther movement of the late 60's.* The Black panthers formed into a black-only group, that left a bloody trail in their wake for half a decade.

Thats just a small example, but do some research on what Muslims teach, and how some of them act to see a more extreme view.

 

[yossarian22]

. Now, if there was a group that heard him speak, and misunderstood, they could easly take it to mean eradicate those who have no tollerance. *black panther movement of the late 60's.* The Black panthers formed into a black-only group, that left a bloody trail in their wake for half a decade.

I have seen nothing that shows how the Black Panthers were inspired by King. They took after Malcolm X, who was not known for his hatred of violence, though he later changed.