• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

What do You Think Science is...

I don't think peer review means what you think it means. :rolleyes:
I do but you don’t, the reason those doctors were on that panel is because they have written peer review papers on their early treatments and experience treating patients with Covid. That’s why congressional oversight called them together in the first place.
 
Lots of words, but none of them addressing the links, the one link you reference did offer evidence of the type of masks, and I linked the observations from that article which you clearly did not read, and you ignored them again. Then again you deny many scientific facts, so who is surprised.
I did read them, and posted what your own citation said. Unscientific and couldn’t draw any conclusions from them. Go back to your party
 
It’s Saturday night and going to enjoy our freedom here in the States without masks and mandates. Good food, hanging out with family, friends and anyone else that shows up. Hope you will too!
 

Sheldon

Veteran Member
I do but you don’t, the reason those doctors were on that panel is because they have written peer review papers on their early treatments and experience treating patients with Covid. That’s why congressional oversight called them together in the first place.
I'm dubious, and your bare claims, or congressional confidence (if that is true) is not peer review.
 
Top