• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

What do you truly believe?

Little Dragon

Well-Known Member
Theology isn't irrational, although sometimes religious apologetics is called theology as way of giving it more crediblity.
Maybe it's irrational to hold testable and falsifiable information, above all other kinds of information, secondary information, such as anecdotal testimony or historical writings, but that is what I do.
 

JustGeorge

Imperfect
Staff member
Premium Member
Ok, I irrationally believe in the non existence of Superman, too. Same with Mother Goose. Mickey Mouse too.

Now, let me please go to pray to all those non existent beings to protect me. LOL.

Ciao

-viole
I took a picture with Mickey Mouse! He does so exist! :D
 

Ebionite

Well-Known Member
Maybe it's irrational to hold testable and falsifiable information, above all other kinds of information, secondary information, such as anecdotal testimony or historical writings, but that is what I do.
The value of historical writings is that they give context for the interpretation of everyday facts. Anecdote is particularly useful when the system has ownership of the scientific method and systemic prejudice exists.
 

Saint Frankenstein

Here for the ride
Premium Member
Lucky was a roommate's cat years ago... she often left him with me for stretches at a time, and I'd paid for his food and medical bills for so long that when it was time to part, I didn't even ask, I just took him with. She acknowledged it was happening, said she didn't like it, but didn't see an alternative.
He's obviously your kitty. :)
 

Vinayaka

devotee
Premium Member
Hmm. I've had a black cat for 13 years...

Maybe that's why my luck stinks!

Meh, I love him anyways.
We had a black cat on the farm where I grew up. He was the strong assertive type, and a real mouser. We named him Black Cat, but over time it got shortened to Blacket. Probably my favorite cat of all that I've known.
 

The Hammer

Skald
Premium Member
I run into people everyday who claim a faith or religion but then don’t live according to said faith or religion. It’s not that they’re intentionally being malicious I simply feel like most people don’t really know what they believe or why.

Uhm..... Ugh.

This is impossible to answer in any single forum post. Or even in any single conversation.
 

Little Dragon

Well-Known Member
The value of historical writings is that they give context for the interpretation of everyday facts. Anecdote is particularly useful when the system has ownership of the scientific method and systemic prejudice exists.
The system has ownership of the scientific method?

What system, what ownership?

History is difficult to test, unless done so in conjunction with the scientific method, as with archaeology. For example. Written history is especially unreliable. Anecdotal evidence is next to worthless, compared to empirically derived information.
 

SalixIncendium

अहं ब्रह्मास्मि
Staff member
Premium Member

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member

SalixIncendium

अहं ब्रह्मास्मि
Staff member
Premium Member
I run into people everyday who claim a faith or religion but then don’t live according to said faith or religion. It’s not that they’re intentionally being malicious I simply feel like most people don’t really know what they believe or why.
Ignorance of the details of one's own religion is not the same as not knowing what one believes.

I'm fairly confident that while some people are ignorant of some of what the religion they identify with teaches, everyone knows what they believe.

As to the title question, which people are apparently responding to rather than the OP, I think, as has already been mentioned, is far too broad. If you really expect the question to be answered, I think you should reframe the question as, "What do you believe about ___________?"

Also, I don't think the word "truly" is necessary. I'm not aware of people that falsely believe things.
 
Top