Can you read my thoughts right now?https://www.quora.com/Has-there-been-any-scientific-proof-for-the-presence-of-telepathy
Obviously it's different for me with my abilities being known
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Can you read my thoughts right now?https://www.quora.com/Has-there-been-any-scientific-proof-for-the-presence-of-telepathy
Obviously it's different for me with my abilities being known
Yes, conversion disorder is a symptom.Ah, 'conversion disorder', 'hysteria' in the good ol' days─ or the possibility of it.
It's not clear to me that labeling certain fad or fashionable social behaviors, sayings, slogans, songs, as 'memes' gives us any new handle on them should they become a problem. What am I missing?
Yes, but I am not that type of guy. At least not on a first dateCan you read my thoughts right now?
You must be reading the mind of my next door neighbor. She's elderly, but spry and kinky. Or so the milkman told me.Yes, but
Yes, but I am not that type of guy. At least not on a first date
Would you rather we go back to calling memes and memeplexes - demons or spirits like in the old days?Ah, 'conversion disorder', 'hysteria' in the good ol' days─ or the possibility of it.
It's not clear to me that labeling certain fad or fashionable social behaviors, sayings, slogans, songs, as 'memes' gives us any new handle on them should they become a problem. What am I missing?
I have been searching the scientific literature and not one paper to be found that is proclaiming verification of the existence of telepathy, psychics, demons, possession, esp, Bigfoot, fairies, Dracula, Nessie, telekinesis, astral projection, clairvoyance, remote whatever or honesty and compassion in Donald Trump.Except it's a fact that demonic possession does not exist. It exist as a belief because at one point in time we had a very limited understanding of human psychology, mental health, and we knew absolutely nothing of neurochemistry or how the different regions of the brain operate us. Having a grand mal seizure is frightening for all involved, even with a physiological explanation. But go back thousands of years, and you see someone suddenly fall over and begin to violently convulse, and when they come to they remember nothing of it, spiritual forces seem a plausible explanation when there is no other possible explanation available.
You seem sure of yourself.Just because you are so sure of yourself; that doesn't make it a fact.
I was around a Demon a while back. Those things are really fast.Who got possessed by a demon
Demons are non-beings. How does one prove the existence of non-beings?I have been searching the scientific literature and not one paper to be found that is proclaiming verification of the existence of telepathy, psychics, demons, possession, esp, Bigfoot, fairies, Dracula, Nessie, telekinesis, astral projection, clairvoyance, remote whatever or honesty and compassion in Donald Trump.
You know. Ectoplasm, cats, and pancakes.Traces of demons?
They exist. I sat in it. Fired it up. Love that new car smell.Demons are non-beings. How does one prove the existence of non-beings?
Trump rallies!You know. Ectoplasm, cats, and pancakes.
Oh. I see. That is the problem. Non-beings have non-evidence. If we ever figure out what any evidence that doesn't support something else, must be evidence of demons that are non-beings. It is so simple.Demons are non-beings. How does one prove the existence of non-beings?
You are onto something. That might be the only evidence for demon possession that is observable and predictable.Trump rallies!
So there is no evidence of memes or memeplexes? Dawkins is wrong?Oh. I see. That is the problem. Non-beings have non-evidence. If we ever figure out what any evidence that doesn't support something else, must be evidence of demons that are non-beings. It is so simple.
It is not something that has any evidence to support and show others. It is a belief. People can claim it, believe it if they want to waste the time, but there is no reason for anyone else to believe it. Maybe all of the so called demon possessions that aren't attributable to mental illness are the result of Maude Johnson a human housewife from somewhere in the multiverse. It is as good an explanation as jumping to demons and I have all the same evidence.
Are they demons? Isn't a meme just an idea?So there is no evidence of memes or memeplexes? Dawkins is wrong?
Wouldn't the idea of a demon be a meme? If it is a meme, does that make it an independent entity? Aren't demons supposed to be independent entities?So there is no evidence of memes or memeplexes? Dawkins is wrong?
Memetics is a theory. But I think it's interesting that memes and memeplexes behave in the same way that the ancients believe that demons behavedAre they demons? Isn't a meme just an idea?
In what respect do you see memes as having similar behavior to ancient descriptions of demons?Memetics is a theory. But I think it's interesting that memes and memeplexes behave in the same way that the ancients believe that demons behaved
In order for a demon to be an entity is for it to have a host. Augustine thought they had no being of their own and owed any being they had on living parasitically off a human hostWouldn't the idea of a demon be a meme? If it is a meme, does that make it an independent entity? Aren't demons supposed to be independent entities?