thanks for playing
do not apply to imagination
does not apply to question #2
AND it does not have history or archeology to back up the large percent of fiction in its pages.
God hates lies and those who tell them. Fiction amounts to lies if taught as fact.
If you refuse to believe something just because you don't want to, can you factually claim they are lies or fiction?
Give us an example of something Biblical that you refuse to believe and then prove that it is fiction.
if anything one can say with certainty that the bible lacks historicity
What part of the Bible do you think is not historical? Remember, I already proved you to be wrong about the water cycle, Abraham, King David and Solomon.
as it was written to be read allegorically
By whom and for what purpose?
can you show me remote tribes in the world that are not from the levant, that have a simular god.
What in the world are you talking about? All of the other ancient tribes and nations were polytheistic.
This would show the same god is talking to everybody equally not just ancient hebrews and only ancient hebrews.
Polytheism does not allow for that.
no it is not, you misunderstand
wrong
ancient hebrews told the tales of the early bible orally for hundreds of years.
Make sure you have proof that can be checked out.
These people came from other semetic speaking cultures, orally bringing their ancient fables with them.
Which people and where did they come from?
If you were right the egyptians and sumerians would have the same religion as ancient hebrews. they do not, They had myths
The religion of the Hebrews was exclusive. No other nation had anything like it.
this is a known myth with 0 historicity
What is?
the creation story is %100 fiction probably taken from the sumerian myth who used a man named adamu
There was no Adamu. Therein lies your myth.
people spoke many languages before babel, this is a fact. it is fiction
I already proved that this is false. I guess I have to do it again:
The languages of today have been traced to their roots by professional linguists. They all go back to the one place mentioned in the Bible.
Their report:
The man who deciphered ancient hyroglyphics and pictorial writing and Oriental language scholar, Sir Henry Rawlinson:
If we were to be guided by the mere intersection of linguistic paths, and independently of all reference to the Scriptural record, we should still be led to fix on
the plains of Shinar, as the focus from which the various lines had radiated.
The Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britian and Ireland, London, 1855, Vol. 15, p. 232.Ge 11:2-9.
no this is false
ancient hebrews created a man god figure "god made man in our image"
this really isnt up for debate because it is so obvious.
ancient hebrews placed very little value on women, they would not have made their god a woman or even part woman. It shows in all their text.
Yet you have furnished no proof for any of this! Why is that?
go look at the sistine chapel ceiling, the early church wanted the painting to reflect their god figure how it was written. what you see is what you get
That place has nothing to do with the Bible or ancient languages nor people's attitude toward women.
yes invented or imagined the same way ancient hebrews imagined their created god.
you only believe in god because of the geographic location you were born, nothing more.
You still have no proof for any of that.
wrong again, scriptures have 0 historicity.
Do you mean there was no slavery in Egypt, no nation of Israel, no occupation of the Promised Land, no period of judges, no kings of Israel, no Jerusalem, no King Hezekiah, no Israelite/Assyrian war, no captivity in Babylon, no destruction of Babylon in a single night, no Babylonian conquest of Tyre, no Alexander the Great.....what in the world do you mean?
we know for a fact as we have writing going back 6000 years [that is before babel] and there was many different languages.
If that were fact, you would have proof. So far, you have none - zero!
really your pulling a YeC attitude, you might as well admit the world is flat and teh sun revolves around the earth at this point
The earth was not always in existence - that is a fact.
Uniformatarianism cannot be proven.
The bible is very clear a day is a day, now your switching text to poorly try to make reality out of fiction.
Are you very clear on that? A day is a day? Were things as bad as this in your grandfather's
DAY?
the proper answer is no the earth was not created in 1 day and it is not 6000 years old
The Bible does not say that so you have nothing there.
exuses for biblical mistakes do not fly.
What "Biblical mistakes?"
there is little hope for you ever having a education that will have use or meaning as you choose to create a false reality and choose to ignore those who know much more then you.
You should stop your bragging about education because your writing, spelling, grammatical construction, etc, tells us that you are not an educated person.
man did not ever walk with dinosaurs, this is a fact you should get used to.
How do you know that?
man naver lived more then 120 years of age on average. To admit man lived 900 + years is a sad statement to show how primitive man still is to gold on to ancient beliefs that were ment to be read allegorically not EVER literally
This a poorly constructed statement that has no meaning. Check your spelling and grammar.
I feel sad knowing that you are not alone
You should be sad to learn that you have no idea what you're talking about.
(\__/)
( . )
>(^)<
Wilson
