Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Are you sure?
I think it is actually better not to know anything about these Jesus stories. Because once you heard them, you better believe them. Or else. A typical offer you cannot refuse
Unless you think that all people who never heard the "good" news for reasons outside their control (for instance per-columbian Americans) will go to hell by default.
Will they? If not, why not?
Ciao
- viole
What good would it do for God to send the good news to people he knows will reject it?
For example, God is under no such obligation to send the gospel message to an athiest who refuses to even believe in God period, God knows who will say yes and he sends the message to those who will accept it.
What good would it do for God to send the good news to people he knows will reject it?
For example, God is under no such obligation to send the gospel message to an athiest who refuses to even believe in God period, God knows who will say yes and he sends the message to those who will accept it.
You are now questioning the character of God and not letting God be God. he does what he wants, because he is God and you are not.Well...
Couldn't he in that case just skip the entire "life" thing all together?
If he already knows, what people will eventually fallow him, and which won't, why do we have to go through this entire thing anyway?
Heck, why CREATE the people he knows will reject him in the first place? It's just a lot of collateral damage he creates there!
Pagans and Christians in the AfterLife: What really goes on:
God is not playing the free will of athiest. What good will it do for God to send a missionary to talk to somebody about Jesus who doesn't even believe that there is a creator? That's like trying to teach somebody algebra who refuses to try and learn basic addition.Well, this is obviously absurd. God is playing with the free will of atheists by withdrawing important information. Pretty lame. And useless. If He already knows who will buy it, the whole exercise is pointless.
But this is not my main point. My point is that we have evidence of entire populations that never heard of Jesus before the missionaries went there. I am not aware that Capt. Cook found churches when he landed in Australia, are you?
And the fact that missionaries go there seems to indicate that those missionaries are aware that those populations cannot possibly know about Jesus and might be receptive to accept the message. I don't think they are expecting to tackle a bunch of scientific rationalists, lol.
So, what about the life and death of one of these people who never managed to meet any of those missionaries and have, therefore, never heard of Jesus and the "good" news?
Will they necessarily go to hell or not? If not, will they have a higher chance of going to hell than someone who was lucky enough to live closer to missionaries or to the events concerning Jesus?
And if they had the same chances of salvation, as it is to be expected from a just God, why send missionaries at all?
Ciao
- viole
I like the part where it says specially of those that believe, why do you think that is?If Jesus took the sins of the world upon himself on the cross, how would there ever be sin left in the world? And why would anyone need to missionary to anyone to bring them to the one and only God there is to come to?
While 1 Timothy 4:10 tells us there is no need to save anyone because Jesus did it all on the cross. Either that or he failed miserably.
For therefore we both labour and suffer reproach, because we trust in the living God, who is the Saviour of all men, specially of those that believe.
If the Bible is the inerrant word of God, that can't be discounted.
If Jesus took the sins of the world upon himself on the cross, how would there ever be sin left in the world? And why would anyone need to missionary to anyone to bring them to the one and only God there is to come to?
While 1 Timothy 4:10 tells us there is no need to save anyone because Jesus did it all on the cross. Either that or he failed miserably.
For therefore we both labour and suffer reproach, because we trust in the living God, who is the Saviour of all men, specially of those that believe.
If the Bible is the inerrant word of God, that can't be discounted.
When interpreting scripture you must be honest about what it says and take time to think about what it means, and you must compare it what other scriptures say, there is reason why the last clause is in there, did you take time to think about it at all? or did you just post this as an attemp to try and point out that my message does not line up with the bible? or that the bible is wrong? most people are not honest about what the bible says, and they always take and pull stuff out of context and without comparing it the rest of the bible. Which i am afraid is what you are doing. You can make the bible say anything you want by pulling it out of context and twisting it.If Jesus took the sins of the world upon himself on the cross, how would there ever be sin left in the world? And why would anyone need to missionary to anyone to bring them to the one and only God there is to come to?
While 1 Timothy 4:10 tells us there is no need to save anyone because Jesus did it all on the cross. Either that or he failed miserably.
For therefore we both labour and suffer reproach, because we trust in the living God, who is the Saviour of all men, specially of those that believe.
If the Bible is the inerrant word of God, that can't be discounted.
When interpreting scripture you must be honest about what it says and take time to think about what it means, and you must compare it what other scriptures say, there is reason why the last clause is in there, did you take time to think about it at all? or did you just post this as an attemp to try and point out that my message does not line up with the bible? or that the bible is wrong? most people are not honest about what the bible says, and they always take and pull stuff out of context and without comparing it the rest of the bible. Which i am afraid is what you are doing. You can make the bible say anything you want by pulling it out of context and twisting it.
For example:
The bible says God created everything and saw that it was good, the Pot Smoker will say "See God created everything and plants and said they were all good!", he however ignores 2 things 1. God cursed the earth after Adam and Eve sinned in the garden, which is AFTER God said everything was good. 2. They don't go around smoking poison ivy with the same logic.
So my point is people are often very ignorant and dishonest about what the bible says and do not take the time to actually find out what it really teaches, too many are content to go to some bible hating website and find tons of lies,misinterpretations,etc. rather than reading it for their self without bias to see what it says.
Notice here that God and his power are CLEARLY SEEN,BEING UNDERSTOOD, by the things that are made (Creation)
So God and his existence are clearly seen by looking at creation, for example the complexity of life, the vastness of the universe, the amazing laws of nature, these all point to an omnipotent God in the same way a 2014 Camaro point to that manufacturer.
There is nothing hateful about warning people from danger that is to come, it's sad that you would interpret it that way.
What would be so mean and angry about telling people who are in a burning building that they must get out or burn?
It would be mean and hateful not to warn people.
Yet I am simply doing the same thing spiritually.
Christianity is the most beautiful truth in all the world, that even though we are wicked and deserve hell, he sent his son Jesus Christ to die on the cross in our place, so that we could have eternal life by trusting on Christ!
That is not angry or hateful, it is absolutely wonderful and loving.
What is hateful is a doctor telling his patient that everything is going to be ok,when he has a serious life threatening disease.
It would be more angry and hateful for me not to say anything.
Notice here that God and his power are CLEARLY SEEN,BEING UNDERSTOOD, by the things that are made (Creation)
So God and his existence are clearly seen by looking at creation, for example the complexity of life, the vastness of the universe, the amazing laws of nature, these all point to an omnipotent God in the same way a 2014 Camaro point to that manufacturer.
This is called General Revelation, and it is the first revelation God gives to a man.
I recommend reading the books by Michael Newton. Amazon.com: Michael Newton: Books, Biography, Blog, Audiobooks, KindleWhat happens when you die.
When interpreting scripture you must be honest about what it says and take time to think about what it means, and you must compare it what other scriptures say, there is reason why the last clause is in there, did you take time to think about it at all? or did you just post this as an attemp to try and point out that my message does not line up with the bible? or that the bible is wrong? most people are not honest about what the bible says, and they always take and pull stuff out of context and without comparing it the rest of the bible. Which i am afraid is what you are doing. You can make the bible say anything you want by pulling it out of context and twisting it.
For example:
The bible says God created everything and saw that it was good, the Pot Smoker will say "See God created everything and plants and said they were all good!", he however ignores 2 things 1. God cursed the earth after Adam and Eve sinned in the garden, which is AFTER God said everything was good. 2. They don't go around smoking poison ivy with the same logic.
So my point is people are often very ignorant and dishonest about what the bible says and do not take the time to actually find out what it really teaches, too many are content to go to some bible hating website and find tons of lies,misinterpretations,etc. rather than reading it for their self without bias to see what it says.
So how does a debate between two Christians over Christian scripture tell us what happens when you die, if the Bible is supposed to be the word of God and you two (let alone amongst the rest of you) cannot agree as to what it means?
You talk about honesty. So let's see how honest you are here:
The central point here is that 'Jesus Saves'. But in order for salvation to occur, there must be something real to save, and that translates to a soul or a self. IOW, if in all this talk about salvation, there is actually no such thing as a soul or a self called "I", who, or what, is there to save?
Secondly, if you can demonstrate the existence of such a creature, then why would Heaven want to save it anyway? It is obviously defective in character, as it is prone to sin. As a matter of fact, that is exactly what Christians tell us: that man's inherent nature is a sin nature, and sin would include murder, mayhem, and rape, to mention just a few. I certainly wouldn't those types hanging around my children in a heavenly afterlife. I say instant vaporization is a much better way.
Are you a Universalist?You're right.Sometimes people are very ignorant and dishonest about the spirit of God and what it means for that eternal creative power to be the one and only source of all that is, was, or shall be.
So when Jesus became the pure unblemished lamb on the cross, taking the sins of the world upon himself there and making that capital punishment device exploited by the Romans, but by no means invented by then, as an altar that was initially designed to hang and shame the dregs of Roman society, he continued to send the message he'd delivered in his earthly ministry.
God humbled himself to save the lowest of the low and the greatest of the great. He died as the last sacrifice for sin.Cleansing the world so that all who believe are saved. And all who are not are assured salvation.
There are very ignorant dishonest people who argue, when they speak of the King of Heaven, on behalf of exclusivity. Rather than inclusion.
"God is ours!" As if he's property who, as creator, suffers pride and designates favorites among all he created and set upon the earth to act according to his will.
They're what many like to call naive. And when they die, surprised.