Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Nothing whatsoever. In Hinduism any material would do and does do. Soil, stone, marble, any metal. A metal statue that is gold plated will not rust and will last longer. Other noble metals (wiki -In chemistry, the noble metals are metals that are resistant to corrosion and oxidation in moist air (unlike most base metals). The short list of chemically noble metals (those elements upon which almost all chemists agree) comprises ruthenium, rhodium, palladium, silver, osmium, iridium, platinum, and gold.[1] More inclusive lists include one or more of mercury,[2][3][4] rhenium[5] or copper as noble metals. On the other hand, titanium, niobium, and tantalum are not included as noble metals although they are very resistant to corrosion.) will do as well, but only silver is more plentiful than gold and it does not last as long. It has do with logic of chemistry when you do want a metal statue on a permanent basis that looks reasonably good over decades (in households) or centuries (temples).
Having gold is yearning for richness and being rich:The proper residence of Lakshmani is home of the poor or needy. Don't make her poor to amass gold, please.
Regards
I get the feeling I'm talking to somebody who has already decided this is wrong and judging from your other posts you seem to believe it shouldn't count to Hindus as a pious act. Enough of that. Stop speaking for other religions, please - especially when you know next to nothing about them and have already decided they're wrong. It's rather rude.
Gold is a very valuable commodity - using gold in a temple's construction (in the past) was an act of communal sacrifice and devotion. They worked something precious into a building of significance as an act of devotion. One way to look at it is it's like another form of zakat (sacrifice of wealth for the good of the community) and can be done in hopes of pleasing the deity(es) the shrine or temple is devoted to. That aside, there can be more obvious reasons why it is done.
Some gods have associations with gold - solar deities are the most obvious, as others have said. But there are others. Aphrodite is one.
Kindly quote from Zoroaster in this connection, please.
Regards
It is a religious debate forum, not a forum on metallurgy, please.Nothing whatsoever. In Hinduism any material would do and does do. Soil, stone, marble, any metal. A metal statue that is gold plated will not rust and will last longer. Other noble metals (wiki -In chemistry, the noble metals are metals that are resistant to corrosion and oxidation in moist air (unlike most base metals). The short list of chemically noble metals (those elements upon which almost all chemists agree) comprises ruthenium, rhodium, palladium, silver, osmium, iridium, platinum, and gold.[1] More inclusive lists include one or more of mercury,[2][3][4] rhenium[5] or copper as noble metals. On the other hand, titanium, niobium, and tantalum are not included as noble metals although they are very resistant to corrosion.) will do as well, but only silver is more plentiful than gold and it does not last as long. It has do with logic of chemistry when you do want a metal statue on a permanent basis that looks reasonably good over decades (in households) or centuries (temples).
It is a religious debate forum, not a forum on metallurgy, please.
What has gold to do with religion?!
The truthful Word of G-d says:
[9:34] O ye who believe! surely, many of the priests and monks devour the wealth of men by false means and turn men away from the way of Allah. And those who hoard up gold and silver and spend it not in the way of Allah — give to them the tidings of a painful punishment,http://www.alislam.org/quran/search2/showChapter.php?ch=9&verse=33
Regards
You want the correct answer or not? You asked a question that has nothing to do with theology, so get an answer that is correct and nothing to do with theology.It is a religious debate forum, not a forum on metallurgy, please.
Yes, and so would metal or wood or earth. Hinduism is agnostic with what a statue is made of. Gold is a reasonable choice to coat a metal statue just as certain kinds of stones (easier to carve but not brittle) as easier to make stone statues with.They say statues are made just for concentration of attention/meditation. Stone would be sufficient for this purpose. Right?
Please
"Anna •
I am a Hindu but my idea of the divine God is different. I don't think of God as a "power source". I don't believe that divinity can be manipulated by humans by creating idols and allowing divine powers to flow into them. God is all that is good in us and in nature. I can pray to an abstract form or to an idol form of my own favorite deity from Hindu mythology. When I pray to an idol, it's my own faith and love that empower me. There are no "magical powers" emanating from the idol. When I chant the mantras, which are true love poems written by sages and saints, I evoke the same love in my heart."
http://isha.sadhguru.org/blog/yoga-meditation/demystifying-yoga/hindu-idols-gods-worship/
There is a whole science of idol-making where a certain form is created with a particular material and energized in a certain way. Different idols are made in different ways where they relocate or rearrange the chakrasin certain places to make them into completely different possibilities. Idol-making is that science through which you manifest the energy in a particular way so that your quality of life can be enhanced.
Temples in India, were built as a very deep science. They were not created for worship. When I say temple, I am referring to the ancient temples. Most modern temples are built just the way you build shopping complexes. Temple building is a very deep science. If the basic aspects of the temple – the size and shape of the idol, the mudra that the idol holds, the parikrama, thegarbha griha, and the mantras used to consecrate the idol are properly matched, a powerful energy system is created.
Even a belief in God is not needed to be a Hindu, far less an idol. No holy book is needed either. Nothing is needed, but everything can be used if you personally find it beneficial to lead a dharmic life.So even idol/statue is not needed. Right? Please
Kindly quote from Krishna in Bhagavad Gita in this connection, please.Even a belief in God is not needed to be a Hindu, far less an idol. No holy book is needed either. Nothing is needed, but everything can be used if you personally find it beneficial to lead a dharmic life.
Why? Do you think the BG is normative to Hinduism? Who gave you that idea?Kindly quote from Krishna in Bhagavad Gita in this connection, please.
Regards
Even a belief in God is not needed to be a Hindu, far less an idol. No holy book is needed either. Nothing is needed, but everything can be used if you personally find it beneficial to lead a dharmic life.
Kindly quote from Krishna in Bhagavad Gita in this connection, please.
Regards
Why? Do you think the BG is normative to Hinduism? Who gave you that idea?
There are three atheistic schools in Hinduism. Samkhya, Mimamsa and Vaiseshika. Nyaya veers from theistic to agnostic. Advaita Vedanta is monistic. The three theistic schools are Dvaita Vedanta, Visishta-Advaita (and gaudiya) and Yoga. Each have their own seperate standard texts. Samkhya-Karika, Mimamsa-Sutra, Nyaya-Sutra, Yoga-sutra, Brahma-Sutra etc.
And I don't with you.Sorry, I don't agree with you.
Regards
I completely missed the link. I do not support such a gigantic and ostentatious gold covered temple in any way shape or form given the cost of gold and how Indian economy is being constantly going into trade deficit partly due to the demand of gold. Hindu religious groups are always free to do what they wish with their private donations, but such a wasteful expenditure should be criticized, not praised.
I would disagree with you. The sun was a symbol of bounties of G-d which humans enjoyed in life without putting any labour into it, it was distinct from the bounties for which men had to work to get any remuneration. Please
Regards