OK, I didn't realize you are an atheist when I posted. Seems like you were heavily influenced by old time religion.
Yes, I was raised in a very Catholic family with hellfire and damnation at the forefront of my religious teaching.
But to be honest, I don't think I ever really believed it. Even from the youngest age I remember thinking it was all pretty unlikely. My parents would tell me things like, if I fell and cut myself it was God punishing me for something I had done. I remember even then understanding life didn't work that way....people didn't get rewards for every good thing and punishments for every bad thing.
It is optimistic to me to think my deceased loved ones are continuing on in a positive environment and that all the internal spiritual progress I make in this life is not wiped out by death.
As I said before, I would love to join you and believe in these things. I simply can't. It's like once you stop believing in things you can never go back. I can no more believe that my deceased loved ones are happily frolicking around somewhere than I can believe tomorrow everyone on Earth will stop fighting and we will have world peace. I would love to believe both...both are as you say very positive, happy sorts of ideas...yet both in my eyes are hopelessly naive and merely wishful thinking.
Just a follow up question on that...after all the reincarnation cycles what is "final Liberation" in your view?
My original point is that since Jesus is such an important figure to so many that we can keep his positive teachings of compassion, brotherly love, golden rule, afterlife, etc. and dispense with the bathwater (dogma like damnation and atoning death). This is what I meant by keeping the baby and throwing out the bathwater.
I get it, and I can agree right up to the afterlife part. Certainly I'm in favor of...if someone so chooses to use the Jesus framework...keeping ideas of compassion, brotherly love and the golden rule. Other Jesus-y lessions like love thy enemy and turn the other cheek are also babies we can save from the bathwater.
The afterlife, for me though, is bathwater, not baby. The reason is for every one person like you who thinks the afterlife is a happy cycle of heaven, reincarnation, heaven, and then presumably something final that is not hell...for each of you we have 10 folks who preach the damnation bit. I can' t see how that fits with a positive worldview. Even if one believes that they themselves are saved, I find it an extremely sad, maudlin way to go through life, with ideas that many people are damned to eternal torture.
The rest I can agree with you for the most part. If someone so chooses to throw out the dogma of hell, damnation and all of that, and they choose to find inspiration in the positive stories of Jesus, that's fine. I just don't think that happens very often though. Most Christians (just using the Christian example because that's the Jesus framework we've been discussing) are literalists when it comes to "Jesus died for our sins" and I think what you're talking about...dumping the damnation dogma...requires the rejection of the literal Biblical teachings regarding the purpose of Jesus' death as it is related to human salvation. Without the threat of damnation, Jesus' sacrfice becomes meaningless, and the whole story from a literal standpoint unravels. Too many Christians can't accept that and so the damnation bit for the most part is kept.