Storm
ThrUU the Looking Glass
I dont know what your question is
If the fiction is popular enough it becomes a myth. evolves so to speak.
It's fairly straightforward.So, are the myths of Zoroastrianism no longer myths, then?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I dont know what your question is
If the fiction is popular enough it becomes a myth. evolves so to speak.
It's fairly straightforward.So, are the myths of Zoroastrianism no longer myths, then?
It's fairly straightforward.
You basically said that the difference between "fiction" and "myth" was popularity. So, I asked whether unpopular stories, like those of Zoroastrianism, are no longer myths.i just dont think it is.
Because it's overly simplistic, as you point out.dont understand why you have a problem with my simplistic view of a myth.
The dictionary rarely gives the whole picture. It is necessarily oversimplified, with much of the subtler connotations lost.I don't see a difference between myth or fiction, they are both English words and subject to misinterpretation, which is what I am seeing in this thread. Howabout we look at the definitions of the words:
MYTH:
a traditional or legendary story, usually concerning some being or hero or event, with or without a determinable basis of fact or a natural explanation, esp. one that is concerned with deities or demigods and explains some practice, rite, or phenomenon of nature.
FICTION:
the class of literature comprising works of imaginative narration, esp. in prose form.
So my thought on the difference is, a Myth is a story that people once believed or currently believe but can't be proven as fact. While a fiction is a story created to be false for entertainment purposes.
The dictionary rarely gives the whole picture. It is necessarily oversimplified, with much of the subtler connotations lost.
whether unpopular stories,
Because it's overly simplistic, as you point out.
My dictionary definition of 'myth' is,..."A traditional story accepted as history; serves to explain the world view of a people".
For example, the 'Big Bang' is a popular myth to explain the beginning of existence, but there are other myths that compete with this as a possible perspective on this question
For example, the 'Big Bang' is a popular myth to explain the beginning of existence, but there are other myths that compete with this as a possible perspective on this question
Let's not confuse scientific theories with myths.
Thats great! im not trying to please everyone nor share there belief or lack of
Agreed, but nobody here is going to agree on anything until we agree on the definitions on both. You can't even begin to debate without some common ground.
No, but if you want us to take your arguments seriously, it'd be great if you could back them up.
I answered "your" questions as to how i feel about the subject .
...
I did the best I could for the questions given, I believe.
Christianity ain't myth, it's straight fiction!
Kidding. Then, what's the essential difference between myth and parable?
Not really. You did answer my questions, but you didn't really give me any reason to take your answers seriously, nor did you really counter my argument. I posted this in a debate because I want to see some good counter-arguments that have reasonable support.
Your asking about myths and fiction
THERES NO SUBSTANCE there, there is nothing to debate.
what arguements could you possibly have over nothing?
I dont get it, what do you want to try and define the limits of mans imagination?
fiction is allot of stuff thast not true it doesnt exist there is no substance
myth is a fictional story that has evolved into a myth
myth means it must be really good lies to gather a following large enough to call it a myth.
What
My argument is that, unlike a work of fiction, a myth actually serves as a cultural basis.