Pegg
Jehovah our God is One
That's what the concept of the New Covenant is in Jeremiah.
if thats the concept, and you agree with it, (i assume you agree with it) why are we arguing over adherence to the mosaci law?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
That's what the concept of the New Covenant is in Jeremiah.
Indeed, a true Christian should feel compelled to combat what they perceive as heretical misconstruing of the intended concepts.
if thats the concept, and you agree with it, (i assume you agree with it) why are we arguing over adherence to the mosaci law?
Because it's about the Mosaic Law being written upon the people's hearts.
A true Christian is kind.
Because it's about the Mosaic Law being written upon the people's hearts.
that depends on what "kind" means...
some interpret being kind to being cruel
A true Christian is a for giving kind. Are you?
yes, after i cool off...
yet i'm not a christian...
come to think of it..That`d be too late then when the damage has been done.
not really forgiving... but controlling
That`s unchristian for such Christians.
It's about the spirit of the law not the letter of the law being written on peoples hearts. Mercy and justice is the spirit of the law not the day you worship or the right kind of sheep you sacrifice.
You'll get a lot of varied answers on this thread. My reply is pretty vague, as I don't want to judge anyone who calls him or herself a Christian: A Christian is someone who follows Jesus' commands to best of his or her ability. Some of His commands: Love your neighbor as yourself. Love God with all your heart, your soul, you strength and your spirit. Love and pray for those who do you wrong. Forgive those who ask. Have mercy on all, so you will be shown mercy as well. You will be judged in the same manner as you judge others. And on and on.
I'd say that anything outside of the 30 A.D. era beliefs was never "True" Christianity to begin with at all, and I'd say the Gospels and Epistles and Revelation all say similarly, they were speaking against heretics since day 1. So long as people go by the "official" Roman Canon and manmade Theologies, whether they join one and renounce other makes no difference, it's all just one counterfeit brand or another. And we don't know what exactly the 30 A.D. beliefs were to begin with, we can only guess, but guesses can be educated guesses at least.When 'true christians' change/trade their current (version of) 'true christianity'
for some New version/conviction of true christianity,
does that mean that their previous brand of true christianity
was not/never really true christianity at all?
I'd say it doesn't matter what one believes is "True Christianity" (even for myself), it's a matter of what most closely follows the very original beliefs regardless what one believes they were (though the scholars and historians are pretty much unanimous that it was a Torah obedient Jewish sect which the Romans didn't even distinguish from other Jews at first). All this talk about "evolving beliefs" is basically acting as if what the texts say about such things doesn't matter, and is exactly against what the texts say.And what if they change their convictions of 'true christianity' yet again?
Since we don't have the originals of the manuscripts and we don't know what exactly is a redaction and edit and pseudipigrapha and what is not (though there's plenty of evidence for much of them to see what is authentic and not), it's a bit of a challenge. However, I'd say that one could be sure that they are CLOSE to what the original 30 A.D. beliefs were if they adopt the Torah and reject Paul and go by Jesus's teachings and abandon any of these post 1st century Antinomian theologies.Can anyone ever REALLY be sure that THEY are in fact... a 'true christian'?
Yes but many Christians would never accept me as being a Christian even though I believe and follow his teachings because I don't believe in the blood atonement or resurrection.
I am using a thread that I just started at http://www.religiousforums.com/foru...volutionists-true-christians.html#post2826564 at the Evolution versus Creationism forum as a basis for this thread.
This occurs when people formulate their own definition of a Christian.
This is a contradictory statement because not believing in blood attonement or resurrection means that you are not following His teachings.