• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

What is "Bad" Science?

Ebionite

Well-Known Member
Another You Tube Conspiracy unqualified idiot
**** off.

  • Dr. David Martin, MD: Dr. Martin is a Cardiovascular Disease specialist in Boston, MA. He graduated from University College, University of London, London Hosp Med Coll, and works at a hospital in Boston, MA.
  • Dr. David E. Martin, PhD: Dr. Martin is the founding CEO of M∙CAM Inc., an international leader in intellectual property-based financial risk management. He has worked closely with the United States Congress, numerous trade and finance regulatory agencies, and has founded several for-profit and non-profit companies and organizations.
  • Dr. David Martin, Mosaic Technologies Inc.: Dr. Martin was the founding CEO of Mosaic Technologies Inc., a company that developed and commercialized advanced computational linguistics technologies, dynamic data compression and encryption technologies, electrical field transmission technology, medical diagnostics, and stealth/anechoic technology.
  • Dr. David W. Martin - Otolaryngology: Dr. Martin is a Castle Connolly Top Doctor whose specialty is Otolaryngology and is located in Tarzana, CA.
  • Dr. David T. Martin - Cardiac Electrophysiology: Dr. Martin is a Castle Connolly Top Doctor whose specialty is Cardiac Electrophysiology and is located in Boston, MA.
  • David P. Martin, M.D., Ph.D. - Mayo Clinic: Dr. Martin is a researcher at the Mayo Clinic, with a focus on cutting-edge research and care in medicine.
 

Evangelicalhumanist

"Truth" isn't a thing...
Premium Member
To me, "truth" is a quality of statements, and a statement is true to the extent that it accurately reflects / corresponds with, objective reality (the world external to the self) ─ the 'correspondence" definition.

What test for truth do you use?
Well done -- and it's why I use "Truth isn't a thing" in my custom title.
 

shunyadragon

shunyadragon
Premium Member
**** off.

  • Dr. David Martin, MD: Dr. Martin is a Cardiovascular Disease specialist in Boston, MA. He graduated from University College, University of London, London Hosp Med Coll, and works at a hospital in Boston, MA.
  • Dr. David E. Martin, PhD: Dr. Martin is the founding CEO of M∙CAM Inc., an international leader in intellectual property-based financial risk management. He has worked closely with the United States Congress, numerous trade and finance regulatory agencies, and has founded several for-profit and non-profit companies and organizations.
  • Dr. David Martin, Mosaic Technologies Inc.: Dr. Martin was the founding CEO of Mosaic Technologies Inc., a company that developed and commercialized advanced computational linguistics technologies, dynamic data compression and encryption technologies, electrical field transmission technology, medical diagnostics, and stealth/anechoic technology.
  • Dr. David W. Martin - Otolaryngology: Dr. Martin is a Castle Connolly Top Doctor whose specialty is Otolaryngology and is located in Tarzana, CA.
  • Dr. David T. Martin - Cardiac Electrophysiology: Dr. Martin is a Castle Connolly Top Doctor whose specialty is Cardiac Electrophysiology and is located in Boston, MA.
  • David P. Martin, M.D., Ph.D. - Mayo Clinic: Dr. Martin is a researcher at the Mayo Clinic, with a focus on cutting-edge research and care in medicine.
In his 20-minute presentation to the summit, Martin argued that the U.S. government and leading vaccine-maker Pfizer nefariously manufactured and released coronavirus before both the 2003 SARS pandemic and COVID-19 pandemic in order to ensure that the world would accept a universal vaccine template. While he claimed to present evidence of U.S.-sponsored biological terrorism on slides during his presentation, none of the summit recordings showed these slides and therefore leave most of his claims without proof of hard evidence for viewers.
 

shunyadragon

shunyadragon
Premium Member
**** off.

  • Dr. David Martin, MD: Dr. Martin is a Cardiovascular Disease specialist in Boston, MA. He graduated from University College, University of London, London Hosp Med Coll, and works at a hospital in Boston, MA.
  • Dr. David E. Martin, PhD: Dr. Martin is the founding CEO of M∙CAM Inc., an international leader in intellectual property-based financial risk management. He has worked closely with the United States Congress, numerous trade and finance regulatory agencies, and has founded several for-profit and non-profit companies and organizations.
  • Dr. David Martin, Mosaic Technologies Inc.: Dr. Martin was the founding CEO of Mosaic Technologies Inc., a company that developed and commercialized advanced computational linguistics technologies, dynamic data compression and encryption technologies, electrical field transmission technology, medical diagnostics, and stealth/anechoic technology.
  • Dr. David W. Martin - Otolaryngology: Dr. Martin is a Castle Connolly Top Doctor whose specialty is Otolaryngology and is located in Tarzana, CA.
  • Dr. David T. Martin - Cardiac Electrophysiology: Dr. Martin is a Castle Connolly Top Doctor whose specialty is Cardiac Electrophysiology and is located in Boston, MA.
  • David P. Martin, M.D., Ph.D. - Mayo Clinic: Dr. Martin is a researcher at the Mayo Clinic, with a focus on cutting-edge research and care in medicine.


Who is the real Dr, David Martin?

Research reveals #2 Financial Conspiracy theorist with no qualification is science or medicine,

Financial analyst David Martin misrepresents studies and patent applications to promote the baseless claim that SARS-CoV-2 was developed as a bioweapon​

 
Last edited:

Argentbear

Well-Known Member
It's obviously only clickbait. But that's enough to make the content irrelevant, right?
The content does a fine job of being not just irrelevant but laughable
You don't get to specify what reality is.
Reality doesn't need any help from me. It is perfectly capable of showing everyone all on it's own that of the miniscule number of people affected by the platelet side effect not one of them died.
 

Argentbear

Well-Known Member

sayak83

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
This case of institutional failure makes me wonder how well peer review can play its vaunted role in the practice of science. All quotes below come from this article: "Get Me Off Your ****ing Mailing List" is an actual science paper accepted by a journal

The paper .. titled "Get me off your ****ing mailing list," was accepted by the International Journal of Advanced Computer Technology.

The journal, despite its distinguished name, is a predatory open-access journal, as noted by io9. These sorts of low-quality journals spam thousands of scientists, offering to publish their work for a fee.


In 2005, computer scientists David Mazières and Eddie Kohler created this highly profane ten-page paper as a joke, to send in replying to unwanted conference invitations. It literally just contains that seven-word phrase over and over, along with a nice flow chart and scatter-plot graph:
mailing list 1
According to the blog Scholarly Open Access, this PDF made the rounds, and an Australian computer scientist named Peter Vamplew sent it to the International Journal of Advanced Computer Technology in response to spam from the journal. Apparently, he thought the editors might simply open and read it.
Instead, they automatically accepted the paper — with an anonymous reviewer rating it as "excellent" — and requested a fee of $150.
This spoof article was published in a predatory journal.
Predatory journals are scam journals whose aim is to fool scientists into paying for publishing in them. They have no academic recognition and the papers are not peer reviewed at all. Think of them as equivalent fake credit card or bank websites that are made to look like real things.
Actual journals don't usually publish such blatant nonsense, but they may be fooled by faked data or AI generated papers. That is a bit more involved issue though.
 

McBell

Admiral Obvious
**** off.

  • Dr. David Martin, MD: Dr. Martin is a Cardiovascular Disease specialist in Boston, MA. He graduated from University College, University of London, London Hosp Med Coll, and works at a hospital in Boston, MA.
  • Dr. David E. Martin, PhD: Dr. Martin is the founding CEO of M∙CAM Inc., an international leader in intellectual property-based financial risk management. He has worked closely with the United States Congress, numerous trade and finance regulatory agencies, and has founded several for-profit and non-profit companies and organizations.
  • Dr. David Martin, Mosaic Technologies Inc.: Dr. Martin was the founding CEO of Mosaic Technologies Inc., a company that developed and commercialized advanced computational linguistics technologies, dynamic data compression and encryption technologies, electrical field transmission technology, medical diagnostics, and stealth/anechoic technology.
  • Dr. David W. Martin - Otolaryngology: Dr. Martin is a Castle Connolly Top Doctor whose specialty is Otolaryngology and is located in Tarzana, CA.
  • Dr. David T. Martin - Cardiac Electrophysiology: Dr. Martin is a Castle Connolly Top Doctor whose specialty is Cardiac Electrophysiology and is located in Boston, MA.
  • David P. Martin, M.D., Ph.D. - Mayo Clinic: Dr. Martin is a researcher at the Mayo Clinic, with a focus on cutting-edge research and care in medicine.
this nothing more than throwing everything you can against the wall and hoping something sticks.

Or is it your claim that all of your listed obviously different people with the same name are all the 'Martin' from your failed video?
 

Ebionite

Well-Known Member
4 years ago and affected less than 70 out of 2 billion vaccines distributed.
"Because the five cases occurred in a population of more than 130,000 vaccinated persons, we propose that they represent a rare vaccine-related variant of spontaneous heparin-induced thrombocytopenia that we refer to as vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia,"


5/130 000 = 1 in 26 000 (60% fatality)
70/2 000 000 000 = 1 in 28 600 000
 

Whateverist

Active Member
This spoof article was published in a predatory journal.
Predatory journals are scam journals whose aim is to fool scientists into paying for publishing in them. They have no academic recognition and the papers are not peer reviewed at all. Think of them as equivalent fake credit card or bank websites that are made to look like real things.
Actual journals don't usually publish such blatant nonsense, but they may be fooled by faked data or AI generated papers. That is a bit more involved issue though.

Yes and yet the system permits this sort of abuse. What does it even mean to say research is peer reviewed if it just something one pays for, $150 for a rating of excellent.
 

McBell

Admiral Obvious
"Because the five cases occurred in a population of more than 130,000 vaccinated persons, we propose that they represent a rare vaccine-related variant of spontaneous heparin-induced thrombocytopenia that we refer to as vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia,"


5/130 000 = 1 in 26 000 (60% fatality)
70/2 000 000 000 = 1 in 28 600 000
How is one death out of twenty six thousand come to a sixty percent death rate?
 

shunyadragon

shunyadragon
Premium Member
Yes and yet the system permits this sort of abuse. What does it even mean to say research is peer reviewed if it just something one pays for, $150 for a rating of excellent.
No, but freedom of the press allows it. Your anti-science agenda is obvious with phony sources,
 
Last edited:

McBell

Admiral Obvious
Three of the five died, from the paper. 1/26000 documented adverse effects relating to clotting.
So what you are saying is that because 3 of the five people out of the two billion who got a blood clot died, it means the vaccine has a 60 percent death rate?
 
Top