• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

What is 'Islamophobia'?

What is 'Islamophobia'?


  • Total voters
    39

Lorgar-Aurelian

Active Member
Lorgar...



In all sincerity, do you not recognize how bigoted this paragraph is?

Please, in friendliness, reflect on your paragraph above. But imagine it targets not Muslims but, for instance, blacks. Or Jews. Does it still sound fine to you?
Here is the thing about that. Jews don't have a backward religion created by a pedophile warlord. You can keep a lot of Africans out too but vet them. I'm honestly less concerned about a lot of African Christians or Hindus but of course in many places African culture is not something that needs to spread. You understand I am willing to keep out anyone including but not limited to, white people, black people, Hispanic people, Asian people ect?

If you follow a disgusting backward religion then forgive me when I say I have little to no sympathy for you.
 

MD

qualiaphile
As far as I can tell we still don't need to take them in and it would still be better these people by and large stay out.

They're human beings, and generally smart, kind and empathetic.

Would you also want to keep out religious minorities such as myself, who have an ethnic link to those countries?
 

sovietchild

Well-Known Member
Here is the thing about that. Jews don't have a backward religion created by a pedophile warlord. You can keep a lot of Africans out too but vet them. I'm honestly less concerned about a lot of African Christians or Hindus but of course in many places African culture is not something that needs to spread. You understand I am willing to keep out anyone including but not limited to, white people, black people, Hispanic people, Asian people ect?

If you follow a disgusting backward religion then forgive me when I say I have little to no sympathy for you.

Pedophile? Who are you calling a pedophile? Marrying young girls age 11 was a common practice in Europe and Byzantine empire. In USA one could marry a girl age 7, 2 centuries ago.
 

Lorgar-Aurelian

Active Member
Pedophile? Who are you calling a pedophile? Marrying young girls age 11 was a common practice in Europe and Byzantine empire. In USA one could marry a girl age 7, 2 centuries ago.
Yes back when we were a bunch of savages when it came to such things. I don't hold up any of those people, they disgust me. The difference here is that some people are still doing it.
 

Lorgar-Aurelian

Active Member
They're human beings, and generally smart, kind and empathetic.

Would you also want to keep out religious minorities such as myself, who have an ethnic link to those countries?
If it's for the greater good then yes. I have no issue saying I would keep out the vast majority. Granted the best option would be vetting on if nothing else religion.
 

sovietchild

Well-Known Member
Yes back when we were a bunch of savages when it came to such things. I don't hold up any of those people, they disgust me. The difference here is that some people are still doing it.

" .. in 1396, Richard II of England was joined in marriage to young Isabel of France, who had been 7 years old when their engagement was announced the previous year in Paris. Not only was there no uproar; there was considerable happiness expressed over the assumed probability that this marriage would end the Hundred Years War then in one of its periodic states of truce between the two kingdoms. Peace was to be ensured by joining together this man and this little girl in marriage.
 

MD

qualiaphile
If it's for the greater good then yes. I have no issue saying I would keep out the vast majority. Granted the best option would be vetting on if nothing else religion.

How do you define the greater good? I regularly campaign for the intellectual criticism of Islam here while hundreds of millions of your fellow whites campaign for its protection and spread. Can you really say I'm worse for Western society than they are?
 

Lorgar-Aurelian

Active Member
" .. in 1396, Richard II of England was joined in marriage to young Isabel of France, who had been 7 years old when their engagement was announced the previous year in Paris. Not only was there no uproar; there was considerable happiness expressed over the assumed probability that this marriage would end the Hundred Years War then in one of its periodic states of truce between the two kingdoms. Peace was to be ensured by joining together this man and this little girl in marriage.
And? Why wouldn't I still call this disgusting?
 

Lorgar-Aurelian

Active Member
How do you define the greater good? I regularly campaign for the intellectual criticism of Islam here while hundreds of millions of your fellow whites campaign for its protection and spread. Can you really say I'm worse for Western society than they are?
Do you think if I had my way they would be allowed to stay? Look non muslims or exmuslims are fine if they are vetted the rest stay out.
 

MD

qualiaphile
Part of the reason i'm still in support of the ban is until a better option is actually proposed by the people in power it's pretty much this or nothing it seems.

I think a better option would be to start criticizing the huge segment of your society that promotes Islamic fundamentalism.
 

Lorgar-Aurelian

Active Member
I think a better option would be to start criticizing he huge segment of your society that promotes Islamic fundamentalism.
Or deporting them when they start advocating for murdering infidels. I mean for god's sake the ****ing prisons use Wahabi translations of the Quran. "We don't want to promote radicalism but hey lets give this unstable group of people the must insane translation of the Quran and it should all work out right? RIGHT?! " I actually used to own a Wahabi translation of the Quran that interpreted certain verses of the Quran to mean fight the united states with like tanks and ak47s.
 

MD

qualiaphile
Or deporting them when they start advocating for murdering infidels. I mean for god's sake the ****ing prisons use Wahabi translations of the Quran. "We don't want to promote radicalism but hey lets give this unstable group of people the must insane translation of the Quran and it should all work out right? RIGHT?! " I actually used to own a Wahabi translation of the Quran that interpreted certain verses of the Quran to mean fight the united states with like tanks and ak47s.

LOL
 

Rival

Diex Aie
Staff member
Premium Member
" .. in 1396, Richard II of England was joined in marriage to young Isabel of France, who had been 7 years old when their engagement was announced the previous year in Paris. Not only was there no uproar; there was considerable happiness expressed over the assumed probability that this marriage would end the Hundred Years War then in one of its periodic states of truce between the two kingdoms. Peace was to be ensured by joining together this man and this little girl in marriage.
Allah should have known better and told Muhammad not to have sex with 9 year old Aisha. It's as simple as that.
 

Rival

Diex Aie
Staff member
Premium Member
It was meant to be that Muhammad was going to **** a nine year old @Rival can't you see that? can't you see God clearly supports pedophiles? Geez check your non pedophile privilege.
This is ironic in more ways than one, Aurelian.

"Non-peadophile privilege."

How would you know if you were talking to a paedophile?

Muhammad certainly wasn't a member of Virped, I can tell you that.
 

sovietchild

Well-Known Member
This is ironic in more ways than one, Aurelian.

"Non-peadophile privilege."

How would you know if you were talking to a paedophile?

Muhammad certainly wasn't a member of Virped, I can tell you that.

He was the member of victorious army. The leader of victorious army.
 
Top