I agree.
This post was more a jab at the "what is female" that has like 200 pages of comments.
No one ever asks what a male is. Or about transmen in general. Only transwomen.
It appears that sexism is rampant even today.
Why don't we broaden it a bit further then? What's in a name (as Juliet asked)?
Tis but thy name that is my enemy;
Thou art thyself, though not a Montague.
What's Montague? It is nor hand, nor foot,
Nor arm, nor face, nor any other part
Belonging to a man. O, be some other name!
What's in a name? That which we call a rose
By any other name would smell as sweet;
So Romeo would, were he not Romeo call'd,
Retain that dear perfection which he owes
Without that title. Romeo, doff thy name,
And for that name which is no part of thee
Take all myself.
From my first memories, until I was 8 years old, I was called Jack Main. Now, as it happens, my first name is Jack (I was named for my mother's brother), and my middle name is Allen (named after a Major in the Salvation Army who helped my mother through her unwed pregnancy. Nobody ever told me my middle name (that I can recall), or ever used it. The last name, Main, is the name of the man my mother married after I was born -- and he never adopted me.
So I grew up as Jack Main.
My healing, from a severely disturbed child (Jack Main brutalized and nearly killed me), only really begain when at 8 years old I learned my last name was actually my mother's last name, and I instantly adopted a new persona for myself, J. Allen E----. Never again would I be called Jack Main, and forever after I was Allen E----
And the truth is, that is the first time I really started being comfortable being me.
See, the problem is that our self-identity has more to do with the mind than it has with the physical body. Like the Jack Russell Terrier that thinks he's a dog 3 times his actual size, and behaves like it, the body has less to do with "who you truly are" than the contents of your mind and memory do.
Another example, let's look at a boy named David Reimer, who, after a botched circumcision at 6 months, was surgically altered, treated with female hormones, and brought up as a girl in every way. The psychologist, John Money, who oversaw his treatment, wrote of it as evidence that sexual identity is primarily learned. BOY, was he wrong.
David began realizing that he was "not a girl" from the age of 9, and was living entirely as a male by the age of 15 -- in spite of the fact that he had no penis or testicles, and a functioning vagina (but of course nothing above that in the female sexual anatomy). David's gender was in his mind, not what he could see of his physical body, and nothing or nobody could alter that.