What is the definition of a "Woman"?

[ppp]

Perhaps I misunderstood you. I do not agree most complaints are about sex organs, had I understood what you were talking about I would have voiced my objection. When I look at the media, most of the complaints I see are concerning athletes. I've seen countless complaints of biological male swimmers, fighters and runners beating biological female swimmers, fighters, and runners, but don't recall any complaints in the media about sex organs; do you?

Sports and bathrooms are merely stalking horses. If they were the real issue then the legislation being advanced from the complainers would not be laser focused on placing political barriers to medical decisions and societal access.

 

[Kfox]

Sports and bathrooms are merely stalking horses. If they were the real issue then the legislation being advanced from the complainers would not be laser focused on placing political barriers to medical decisions and societal access.

Even though medical decisions and societal access (mostly involved little children too easily manipulated by activist adults) is a focus of political barriers, it isn't the only focus; there are plenty of others

 

[ppp]

Even though medical decisions and societal access (mostly involved little children too easily manipulated by activist adults) is a focus of political barriers, it isn't the only focus; there are plenty of others

Your unsupported opinion is rejected.

 

[Kfox]

Your unsupported opinion is rejected.

Unsupported? Below are a few links that support what I was talking about.

Transgender swimmer's NCAA championship win 'just not right,' competitor's parents say

Outrage after transgender MMA fighter defeats French woman

Girl Who Lost State Titles to Transgender Athletes: 'Devastating'

 

[ppp]

Unsupported?

You seem to have a hard time tracking your conversations. This is the third time that you have been unable to reply in context. The first time I had to walk you through what was said step by step. The second time claimed the be too pressed for time to keep track of the conversation. This is third time. You're out.

 

[Kfox]

You seem to have a hard time tracking your conversations. This is the third time that you have been unable to reply in context. The first time I had to walk you through what was said step by step. The second time claimed the be too pressed for time to keep track of the conversation. This is third time. You're out.

On post #481 I was very clear; I believed most of the complaints were coming from athletes. You called this an unsupported claim, so I listed 3 links from 3 different sports where complaints came concerning athletes. Now instead of responding to my consistent claim, you claim I am having a hard time tracking my own conversations? Go back to post #481 and you will see my response is consistent.

 

[ppp]

On post #481 I was very clear; I believed most of the complaints were coming from athletes. You called this an unsupported claim, so I listed 3 links from 3 different sports where complaints came concerning athletes. Now instead of responding to my consistent claim, you claim I am having a hard time tracking my own conversations? Go back to post #481 and you will see my response is consistent.[/QUOTE

Sports and bathrooms are merely stalking horses. If they were the real issue then the legislation being advanced from the complainers would not be laser focused on placing political barriers to medical decisions and societal access.

 

[ppp]

On post #481 I was very clear; I believed most of the complaints were coming from athletes. You called this an unsupported claim, so I listed 3 links from 3 different sports where complaints came concerning athletes. Now instead of responding to my consistent claim, you claim I am having a hard time tracking my own conversations? Go back to post #481 and you will see my response is consistent.

And my response to 481was,

Sports and bathrooms are merely stalking horses. If they were the real issue then the legislation being advanced from the complainers would not be laser focused on placing political barriers to medical decisions and societal access.

That was not a denial that there are people complaining about sports.
Your reply was to simply repeat yourself and give citations to something I didn't disclaim in the first place. I apologize for assuming that you were responding to what I actually said. I retract my apology because you didn't respond to what I actually said.

Cheers.

 

[Kfox]

That was not a denial that there are people complaining about sports.
Your reply was to simply repeat yourself and give citations to something I didn't disclaim in the first place.

You called my claim “an unsupported opinion”. If that isn’t a disclaim, what do you call it? I gave citations because you called my claim unsupported.

I apologize for assuming that you were responding to what I actually said. I retract my apology because you didn't respond to what I actually said.

I did respond to you. You said there was a laser focus on medical decisions and societal access. I was pointing out that there were other things as well.

 

[ppp]

You called my claim “an unsupported opinion”. If that isn’t a disclaim, what do you call it? I gave citations because you called my claim unsupported.

I called your claim an unsupported opinion because in the light of the post in which you appeared to be responding, it was. But since you were not responding to my post, I call it your statement irrelevant.

I did respond to you.

Not in any substantive manner. I am sure that you believe that you were.

 

[Kfox]

I called your claim an unsupported opinion because in the light of the post in which you appeared to be responding, it was. But since you were not responding to my post, I call it your statement irrelevant.

Call it what you want; you said the complainers were laser focused on medical decisions and social access, and I objected saying it was much more than that. I even provided links to support my claim. So I think I made my point.

 

[ppp]

Call it what you want; you said the complainers were laser focused on medical decisions and social access, and I objected saying it was much more than that. I even provided links to support my claim. So I think I made my point.

So your citation of the existence of something that my post explicitly acknowledged is somehow making a point. Cool.

 

[Dogknox20]

Facile paranoia.



Are you suggesting women should not be treated equally?



Nature is insentient, it has no "intent".



A knee jerk false dichotomy if ever there as one.



Just like buses look, none for ages then two in a row...



FACT saying FACT in capital letters, and enclosing the claim with FACT, doesn't make it a FACT.




That's called immigration, America would not exist as the country it is now without it, indeed the economies of most post industrialised countries make immigration a necessity.

Men can become woman and be treated equally as woman!
Your reply.. Are you suggesting women should not be treated equally?
I am saying... Don't jerk around with nature! Treat woman as woman not as men!

Don't lock up the car jacker.. The problem is caused by those who drive fancy cars, don't keep anything of value in your car it is your fault if you do!
Your reply.. A knee jerk false dichotomy if ever there as one.
Exactly... This is the democratic way... It is NOT the fault of the criminal but society!

You said... That's called immigration, America would not exist as the country it is now without it, indeed the economies of most post industrialised countries make immigration a necessity.
I reply.. You are most definitely wrong! It is NOT called immigration it is called "irresponsible government"!
It's NOT looking after the country by letting in Terrorist's, Rapists', Child molesters, low life scum! There is NOT documentation all are let in open door policy!
Sheldon DON'T say they have it all under control!
................................................................
im·mi·gra·tion
/ˌiməˈɡrāSH(ə)n/
noun

1. the action of coming to live permanently in a foreign country.
   "patterns of immigration from the Indian sub-continent to Britain"
   • the place at an airport or country's border where government officials check the documents of people entering that country.
   • ..................................................................

Sheldon take your head out of the sand! Tent Cities springing up all over the country!

 

[Kfox]

So your citation of the existence of something that my post explicitly acknowledged is somehow making a point. Cool.

So you acknowledge the complaints concerning sports? Because before you said they were not real issues; are you changing it now?

 

[ppp]

So you acknowledge the complaints concerning sports? Because before you said they were not real issues; are you changing it now?

I don't have to change anything. Post 481, the post that you have been going on and on about since Tuesday, acknowledged the existence of complaints about sports and bathrooms in the very first sentence. If that was the whole of your objection, then you are objecting to your own internal narrative.

 

[Sheldon]

You seem to have a hard time tracking your conversations. This is the third time that you have been unable to reply in context. The first time I had to walk you through what was said step by step. The second time claimed the be too pressed for time to keep track of the conversation. This is third time. You're out.

Well done, I am far too lax in accommodating this sort of obfuscation by some. Given how easy it is to quickly click back through previous posts, and quote them, this kind of obfuscation is completely unjustifiable.

 

[ppp]

Well done, I am far too lax in accommodating this sort of obfuscation by some. Given how easy it is to quickly click back through previous posts, and quote them, this kind of obfuscation is completely unjustifiable.

Unfortunately, I didn't stick to my guns. What can I say, I was bored.

 

[Sheldon]

take your head out of the sand! Tent Cities springing up all over the country!

Don't assign text to me that doesn't use the quote function or has no link to my posts please, it's very easy to quote any or all of a post, and that way it has a link to the post it came from for context. You are misrepresenting me here, don't do it again please.

Don't jerk around with nature! Treat woman as woman not as men!

Do you wear shoes? Were you born with them, did they occur naturally? very poor argument indeed...

This is the democratic way... It is NOT the fault of the criminal but society!

This is still a dishonest straw man, and shocking hyperbole. Address what I actually say, not your straw man interpretation.

You are most definitely wrong! It is NOT called immigration

immigration
noun

1. the action of coming to live permanently in a foreign country.

Yeah it really is, and again the complex economies of modern post industrialised countries like the US couldn't function without immigration. I have no idea what your list of crimes have to do with immigration? If we could prevent crime we would do so, who commits it isn't relevant. Of course I think it is prudent to do due diligence during immigration on any criminal record as far is practical. You seem to be trying to create some sort of negative stereotype of immigrants, which is simply bigotry.

 

[Colt]

 

[Dogknox20]

View attachment 61711

Good point...