• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

What is the falsification methodology of the God argument?

TagliatelliMonster

Veteran Member

TagliatelliMonster

Veteran Member
Exactly. But some people insist on reading with narrow, literalistic understanding, which means that they miss the important message.

But of course it's easier for them.

"some people" ey?

If you wish to call 80 million people "some people", maybe.
And that's just bible literalist from America alone.

Don't tell me that "most, if not all" theists only believe things that make sense.

And these folks, all believe this nonsense "on faith".

Because, just like my initial point which started this whole thing, that can only be done precisely because on faith, you can believe literally ANYTHING.

Faith is not a pathway to truth.
Faith, is not sensible.
 

halbhh

The wonder and awe of "all things".
In other words, you just acknowledged the religious beliefs from more then half of american christians (56% of americans) as being nonsensical.

Since you refer to scientific evidence, I'll go ahead and assume you think the same about creationists (ie: evolution deniers in general). This means you think literally hundreds of millions of people hold nonsensical religious beliefs.

Level of support for evolution - Wikipedia

So much for "most, if not all theists only believe things that make sense".

Then to drive the point home...

ALL these people, believe these things on faith.



Here's a question for you, just to get to the core of the issue.

In your own words, what is the exact difference between believing something "on faith" vs believing something "on evidence"?

Faith is to believe before seeing specific evidence that proves the specific thing believed in a strongly supportive way.

But we tend to put faith into things we think there is good cause to believe in -- so we don't just believe in whatever, but in things for a reason.

Now, of course, in the case of YEC, the problem is God didn't explain time details about creation, and then some not very logical thinkers then filled in the blanks with assumptions, and then asserted their theory was what the text says, and tricked others into believing that. It is possible to tell people what to see, and then read a text to them encouraging them to see what you have told them to see, and there's how YEC started in my guesstimation. But in reality the Genesis chapter 1 text doesn't' even tell us how much time passed during verse 1 before the later moment in verse 2. The assumption that is little or zero time is a total invention out of nowhere, but it's a key YEC assumption.
 

halbhh

The wonder and awe of "all things".
There is no evidence of a plan. Nature does not seem to be teleological.
I agree. Clear and undisputable evidence that clearly proved God exists would contradict the repeated message of the common bible that God wants us to do that 'leap of faith' commonly called 'to believe' or 'have faith'. One could not accomplish 'faith' if easy proof was already seen ahead of time. Ergo, if the bible is correct (as I think from testing things Christ said), then clear proof ahead of time must all be removed/missing, as a necessary condition for taking that choice to trust/have faith one is asked to do towards God, the one who loves us enough to suffer for us to the level of death to turn us from evil (or just dissipation) back to Him.
 

samtonga43

Well-Known Member
"some people" ey?
If you wish to call 80 million people "some people", maybe.

No, I wasn't referring to 'Bible-belt-ish' Christians. I was referring to you actually.

Because, just like my initial point which started this whole thing, that can only be done precisely because on faith, you can believe literally ANYTHING.

As I explained to you, this is not true.

Faith is not a pathway to truth.
Faith, is not sensible.

Faith + Evidence is most definitely a pathway to Truth.
Faith makes complete sense to me.
 

samtonga43

Well-Known Member

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
You said (#429) that 80 million Americans believe in a 6000 year old earth and the physically impossible literal interpretation of the flood.
You produced the following when I asked for your evidence:
Record Few Americans Believe Bible Is Literal Word of God (gallup.com)

I can't seem to find the evidence in this 'poll'. Are you sure it's in there?
The poll is the evidence. It said that 25% of Americans believe in the Bible literally:

Fewer than one in four Americans (24%) now believe the Bible is "the actual word of God, and is to be taken literally, word for word,"

0.24*331,000,000 = 79.44 million. That is pretty close to 80 million.

EDIT: If you read the article there was a link to the question that they asked in the poll. Here it is:

Which of the following statements comes closest to describing your views about the Bible -- the Bible is the actual word of God and is to be taken literally, word for word, the Bible is the inspired word of God but not everything in it should be taken literally, or the Bible is an ancient book of fables, legends, history, and moral precepts recorded by man]?

If one believes the Bible "word for word" that means that one believes the Noah's Ark myth.
 
Last edited:

Aupmanyav

Be your own guru
With God it isn't quite as cut and dried
It does not matter at all for me. I have no need for a God in my life and I do not believe in the life-after death crap.
Now, of course, in the case of YEC, the problem is God didn't explain time details about creation, and then some not very logical thinkers then filled in the blanks with assumptions, and then asserted their theory was what the text says, and tricked others into believing that.
God did not also give time details about the 'end of the days'. People have been waiting for over 2000 years for it. And every five or ten years, someone or the other crops up saying that the end of days in March or September.
.. God wants us to do that 'leap of faith' commonly called 'to believe' or 'have faith'.
"Leap of faith"! IMHO, it is a 'leap in to ignorance`, making humans out of mud and women from the man's rib. Such 'leap of faith' has always been convenient to shamans and charlatans.
 
Last edited:

darkskies

Active Member
I believe I stand corrected you only need true premises if you wish to have a true conclusion. According to RF there is nothing known, so all premises and conclusions are false or rather as RF sees it, indeterminate.
Yes and since the premises might have to hold things of infinite value (for god arguments), I'm unsure as to whether it can be logically deduced in the first place.
 

samtonga43

Well-Known Member
It does not matter at all for me. I have no need for a God in my life and I do not believe in the life-after death crap.God did not also give time details about the 'end of the days'. People have been waiting for over 2000 years for it. And every five or ten years, someone or the other crops up saying that the end of days in March or September.
"Leap of faith"! IMHO, it is a 'leap in to ignorance`, making humans out of mud and women from the man's rib. Such 'leap of faith' has always convenient to shamans and charlatans.

Ah! Yet another literalist.
 

samtonga43

Well-Known Member
The poll is the evidence. It said that 25% of Americans believe in the Bible literally:

Fewer than one in four Americans (24%) now believe the Bible is "the actual word of God, and is to be taken literally, word for word,"



0.24*331,000,000 = 79.44 million. That is pretty close to 80 million.

EDIT: If you read the article there was a link to the question that they asked in the poll. Here it is:

Which of the following statements comes closest to describing your views about the Bible -- the Bible is the actual word of God and is to be taken literally, word for word, the Bible is the inspired word of God but not everything in it should be taken literally, or the Bible is an ancient book of fables, legends, history, and moral precepts recorded by man]?

If one believes the Bible "word for word" that means that one believes the Noah's Ark myth.

I would be very interested to know how this poll was set up; how many Christians were involved, type of questions asked, when and where the questions were asked, how many fundamentalists / liberal Christians made up total believers...

One has to be very careful when using polls as evidence of any kind.

But I expect you are aware of this.

(I wonder how many Christians believe that Jesus is a gate?)
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
I would be very interested to know how this poll was set up; how many Christians were involved, type of questions asked, when and where the questions were asked, how many fundamentalists / liberal Christians made up total believers...

One has to be very careful when using polls as evidence of any kind.

But I expect you are aware of this.

(I wonder how many Christians believe that Jesus is a gate?)
There are probably far more Christian literalists than you think that there are. And you missed the point of the article. This is the lowest ever percentage of literalists ever. Gallup is usually fairly reliable for this fort of poll since they strive not to have an agenda either way.
 

samtonga43

Well-Known Member
There are probably far more Christian literalists than you think that there are. And you missed the point of the article. This is the lowest ever percentage of literalists ever. Gallup is usually fairly reliable for this fort of poll since they strive not to have an agenda either way.

No, I didn't miss the point of the article.

I am constantly surprised that I come across so few Christian literalists.

I think that those who have abandoned the literalist approach to Scriptural truth now realize how much they were missing.
 

Aupmanyav

Be your own guru
Yes, I too was one those (strong atheist).
We all have our stories. Yourself, changing from atheism to theism; and myself, changing from theism to strong atheism (which does not even agree to the possibility of existence of Gods and Goddesses and even less to the existence of just one God professed by a certain religion). What proof can you provide for it?
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
No, I didn't miss the point of the article.

I am constantly surprised that I come across so few Christian literalists.

I think that those who have abandoned the literalist approach to Scriptural truth now realize how much they were missing.
There are quite a few here. And I can name a forum where most of the Christians appear to be literalists. The literalists are in the minority, but they make far more noise than those that are not. As a result many non-Christians have a tendency to overestimate their numbers.
 
Top