TagliatelliMonster
Veteran Member
LOL! In my experience it is non-theists who believe in ghosts, alien abduction, bigfoot etc.
Now who's arguing strawman?
Where have I said these are (exclusively) theistic beliefs?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
LOL! In my experience it is non-theists who believe in ghosts, alien abduction, bigfoot etc.
This is called 'Begging the Question'.
Can you show the evidence for this statement?
Exactly. But some people insist on reading with narrow, literalistic understanding, which means that they miss the important message.
But of course it's easier for them.
In other words, you just acknowledged the religious beliefs from more then half of american christians (56% of americans) as being nonsensical.
Since you refer to scientific evidence, I'll go ahead and assume you think the same about creationists (ie: evolution deniers in general). This means you think literally hundreds of millions of people hold nonsensical religious beliefs.
Level of support for evolution - Wikipedia
So much for "most, if not all theists only believe things that make sense".
Then to drive the point home...
ALL these people, believe these things on faith.
Here's a question for you, just to get to the core of the issue.
In your own words, what is the exact difference between believing something "on faith" vs believing something "on evidence"?
There is no evidence of a plan. Nature does not seem to be teleological.I believe laws are like a plan and that means there is a planner.
I agree. Clear and undisputable evidence that clearly proved God exists would contradict the repeated message of the common bible that God wants us to do that 'leap of faith' commonly called 'to believe' or 'have faith'. One could not accomplish 'faith' if easy proof was already seen ahead of time. Ergo, if the bible is correct (as I think from testing things Christ said), then clear proof ahead of time must all be removed/missing, as a necessary condition for taking that choice to trust/have faith one is asked to do towards God, the one who loves us enough to suffer for us to the level of death to turn us from evil (or just dissipation) back to Him.There is no evidence of a plan. Nature does not seem to be teleological.
"some people" ey?
If you wish to call 80 million people "some people", maybe.
Because, just like my initial point which started this whole thing, that can only be done precisely because on faith, you can believe literally ANYTHING.
Faith is not a pathway to truth.
Faith, is not sensible.
The flood as described in the bible is demonstrably physically impossible. The boat too.
The poll is the evidence. It said that 25% of Americans believe in the Bible literally:You said (#429) that 80 million Americans believe in a 6000 year old earth and the physically impossible literal interpretation of the flood.
You produced the following when I asked for your evidence:
Record Few Americans Believe Bible Is Literal Word of God (gallup.com)
I can't seem to find the evidence in this 'poll'. Are you sure it's in there?
It does not matter at all for me. I have no need for a God in my life and I do not believe in the life-after death crap.With God it isn't quite as cut and dried
God did not also give time details about the 'end of the days'. People have been waiting for over 2000 years for it. And every five or ten years, someone or the other crops up saying that the end of days in March or September.Now, of course, in the case of YEC, the problem is God didn't explain time details about creation, and then some not very logical thinkers then filled in the blanks with assumptions, and then asserted their theory was what the text says, and tricked others into believing that.
"Leap of faith"! IMHO, it is a 'leap in to ignorance`, making humans out of mud and women from the man's rib. Such 'leap of faith' has always been convenient to shamans and charlatans... God wants us to do that 'leap of faith' commonly called 'to believe' or 'have faith'.
Yes and since the premises might have to hold things of infinite value (for god arguments), I'm unsure as to whether it can be logically deduced in the first place.I believe I stand corrected you only need true premises if you wish to have a true conclusion. According to RF there is nothing known, so all premises and conclusions are false or rather as RF sees it, indeterminate.
It does not matter at all for me. I have no need for a God in my life and I do not believe in the life-after death crap.God did not also give time details about the 'end of the days'. People have been waiting for over 2000 years for it. And every five or ten years, someone or the other crops up saying that the end of days in March or September.
"Leap of faith"! IMHO, it is a 'leap in to ignorance`, making humans out of mud and women from the man's rib. Such 'leap of faith' has always convenient to shamans and charlatans.
The poll is the evidence. It said that 25% of Americans believe in the Bible literally:
Fewer than one in four Americans (24%) now believe the Bible is "the actual word of God, and is to be taken literally, word for word,"
0.24*331,000,000 = 79.44 million. That is pretty close to 80 million.
EDIT: If you read the article there was a link to the question that they asked in the poll. Here it is:
Which of the following statements comes closest to describing your views about the Bible -- the Bible is the actual word of God and is to be taken literally, word for word, the Bible is the inspired word of God but not everything in it should be taken literally, or the Bible is an ancient book of fables, legends, history, and moral precepts recorded by man]?
If one believes the Bible "word for word" that means that one believes the Noah's Ark myth.
Literal or allegorical, it does not make any difference to me. I am a strong atheist and a Hindu.Ah! Yet another literalist.
There are probably far more Christian literalists than you think that there are. And you missed the point of the article. This is the lowest ever percentage of literalists ever. Gallup is usually fairly reliable for this fort of poll since they strive not to have an agenda either way.I would be very interested to know how this poll was set up; how many Christians were involved, type of questions asked, when and where the questions were asked, how many fundamentalists / liberal Christians made up total believers...
One has to be very careful when using polls as evidence of any kind.
But I expect you are aware of this.
(I wonder how many Christians believe that Jesus is a gate?)
Literal or allegorical, it does not make any difference to me. I am a strong atheist and a Hindu.
There are probably far more Christian literalists than you think that there are. And you missed the point of the article. This is the lowest ever percentage of literalists ever. Gallup is usually fairly reliable for this fort of poll since they strive not to have an agenda either way.
We all have our stories. Yourself, changing from atheism to theism; and myself, changing from theism to strong atheism (which does not even agree to the possibility of existence of Gods and Goddesses and even less to the existence of just one God professed by a certain religion). What proof can you provide for it?Yes, I too was one those (strong atheist).
There are quite a few here. And I can name a forum where most of the Christians appear to be literalists. The literalists are in the minority, but they make far more noise than those that are not. As a result many non-Christians have a tendency to overestimate their numbers.No, I didn't miss the point of the article.
I am constantly surprised that I come across so few Christian literalists.
I think that those who have abandoned the literalist approach to Scriptural truth now realize how much they were missing.