lukethethird
unknown member
What is the NATO?
Think Libya, and now Ukraine.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Especially Libya.What is the NATO?
Think Libya, and now Ukraine.
Because the NATO has turned out to be a warmongering organization meant to make the ongoing conflicts escalate... and to turn all conflicts into economic operations.
I've been to EuropeI live in Europe, okay?
I have no idea of what Asia geopolitics is. And honestly I have no idea of how things work in the Pacific Ocean, and in the Indian Ocean.
I exclusively know the geopolitics of Europe. In detail. I also speak 6 European languages.
I don't understand why American people who have never been to Europe claim to know what's going on in Europe.
I am humble, and I would never claim I know what's going on in Taiwan.
Seeing what nato did to Libya, now Ukraine is paying that price. It has been well understood for decades by those paying attention that nato's push eastern would result in Ukraine being where the bloodbath takes place. Nato has now formed a Pacific alliance and wants to go to war with China, Taiwan will pay that price.Especially Libya.
But I live here and I speak to Europeans 24/7.I've been to Europe
I said NATO.But by the same tone...I don't know how someone from Italy can know so much about America to refer to it as a warmongering country
Indeed.Seeing what nato did to Libya,
Ukraine is just a pawn.now Ukraine is paying that price.
Because I can read Russian and translate it into English or Italian.And does living in Europe make you a Russian expert or an expert on all the countries of Europe...
Like I said..have fun storming the castle
You appear to know so little about the US news outlets... there is more than CNN...just so you know..heck I can watch BBC, NHK and even news from France here at my houseBecause I can read Russian and translate it into English or Italian.
I mean most Americans cannot, so they will believe whatever CNN (certainly not news) tells them about Russia.
You do realize, living in a plave 24/7 does not make you an expert on the entire place nor does it mean you know anything about other European countries and their politicsBut I live here and I speak to Europeans 24/7.
In different languages.
I said NATO.
NATO is an organization, so since my country is in the NATO, it participated to this warmongering attitude.
Let's not forget that MOST European countries have done nothing to favor peace between Ukraine and Russia.
The American mainstream news doesn't even show us or tell us what Putin has said, doesn't broadcast his speeches even when they're addressed to the West, etc. If you want to know anything besides "Putin is a an evil dictator and we must help Ukraine for the sake of democracy", you have to make the effort to look it up yourself. They do this all the time with foreign issues and countries our government is saber rattling with. This is why Americans tend to be badly informed about world affairs. It's because the media and government keeps it that way. They never show the full issue.Because I can read Russian and translate it into English or Italian.
I mean most Americans cannot, so they will believe whatever CNN (certainly not news) tells them about Russia.
Honestly I think that debate is supposed to be about the topic discussed.You do realize, living in a plave 24/7 does not make you an expert on the entire place nor does it mean you know anything about other European countries and their politics
You also seem to forget your other posts where you did call other countires, not NATO specific, warmongers
But seeing as I do not agree with the Debater and am not willing to accept the statements made based on a claimed knowledge just because one lives in an area, and the ability to speak, read and write another language as factual or even realistic. It becomes topic for debateHonestly I think that debate is supposed to be about the topic discussed.
Not about the debater.
Honestly I think that debate is supposed to be about the topic discussed.
Not about the debater.
You started it...by speaking of the personal level.But seeing as I do not agree with the Debater and am not willing to accept the statements made based on a claimed knowledge just because one lives in an area, and the ability to speak, read and write another language as factual or even realistic. It becomes topic for debate
So ...I was wrong when I was little
I thought the NATO was synonym with peace and peacekeeping. Now I know that NATO is synonym with Military-Industrial Complex, with Industries producing Warfare and with Warmongers.
What is personal, I question your expertise based on the experience you claim to have.... So I cannot question? must take it at your word, without anything proving actual knowledge of the topic..... Not going to happen.... by that logic I could say I am an expert on all things American Politics because I have lived here my whole life, and worked for the government for 30 years...and nothing could be further from the truth.... way to much subterfuge in politics as well as way to many fabulists to keep up with it all...You started it...by speaking of the personal level.
What is personal, I question your expertise based on the experience you claim to have.... So I cannot question? must take it at your word, without anything proving actual knowledge of the topic..... Not going to happen.... by that logic I could say I am an expert on all things American Politics because I have lived here my whole life, and worked for the government for 30 years...and nothing could be further from the truth.... way to much subterfuge in politics as well as way to many fabulists to keep up with it all...
For the time being, thankfully, but isn't that a point of concern? How long before they turn into something less tolerable as we've seen in times past? The nature of both conquest and national defense demands more severity than what many of us have been accustomed to. Where does the EU fit into the geopolitics concerning Russia and the Ukraine? At the moment, NATO has been for the most part sitting on the sidelines doing much of nothing yet have become the targeted ridicule of this thread. Thus far NATO has offered some humanitarian aid and I think there have been concerns over arms, but I'm uncertain if this is anything concerning enough to warrant greater NATO involvement.Honestly, the only thing the topic you bring up demonstrates is how you see the world in a very black and white kind of way. Before you knew NATO did shady things, they were good guys. Now that you realize that they do shady things, they are bad guys
We are talking about geopolitics. The moments that are truly black or white are very few, and the muddy moments of greyness are all pervasive. It is what it is whether you like it or not, and this is the way geopolitics has always been. Thankfully geopolitics are a hell of a lot less bloody and brutal now than they've been in the past, so that's something positive at least