• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

What is the punishment for converting from Islam?

Lyndon

"Peace is the answer" quote: GOD, 2014
Premium Member
Hi Lyndon,

No doubt that there have been some horrible western interventions in the ME, and no doubt that they have worsened many of the region's problems.

That said, it's not accurate to say that sectarian violence is due to western interventions, that's harmful revisionist history. Ask yourself why we see so many Muslim sects attacking each other? (And we have seen this long before western interventions.) Ask yourself honestly about 1400 years of violent Islamic conquest. This is not to say that Christians aren't also guilty of a lot of violence - they are. But not being accurate about the true nature of Islam's history is not a path to peace.

Sorry but you're trying to make a false distinction between the history of violence in Muslim vs Christian cultures. You seem to be insinuating the premise that Muslims are more Violent throughout their history, than the Western nations with their Christian traditions, WRONG, have you forgotten about the crusades, the Spanish conquest of South and Central america, and Mexico. The American slaughter of the native Indians, the Inquisition, WWI, WWII, Korea Vietnam, get my drift

Now lets look at the present conflict since 1990, A world wide war against select Islamic countries by the Western Powers, Over 1 million Muslims killed by the western powers, established fact, If you were to add up all the Jews and Westerners killed in the present conflict, maybe 20,000 total, muslim on muslim violence maybe 50-200,000 mostly involved in a war started by the upheaval generated by the Allied invasions. And since you've insisted on including muslim on muslim violence in the equation, then we have to look at the figures of Christian on Christian violence in Europe and America in the drug/gang war. I wouldn't begin to know the figures.

So let me ask you honestly, in this present conflict since 1990, who has been the more violent, The allied Forces invading, or the Muslim defenders. It doesn't take a genius to see there's something wrong with this picture, the Christians, the ones taught to turn the other cheek, are killing guys just for slapping them on the cheek.

My opinion both sides are wrong, both sides are behaving way to violently, throughout history, and today, But trying to say the most violent side, that has killed by far the most innocent civilians are the "good guys". give me a break, There are no winners in war, everyone loses.
 
Last edited:

icehorse

......unaffiliated...... anti-dogmatist
Premium Member
Lyndon,

You didn't read my post carefully. You assumed I was saying more than I said. I wasn't.
 

mahmoud mrt

Member
Hers are not lies. I appreciate your quotations from the Qur'an; but she doesn't exposes the religion or the Qur'an.


She just analyzes how the political aspects of the history of Islam are taken out of context and turned into something evil.



I respectfully disagree,


How did you reach the conclusion that she only analyzes?!, she directly attacks the Qur’an and the prophet, telling direct lies,


I could respect her if she talked in an analytical way, for instance:


“Many Islamic scholars say so and so, many extremists interpret the Qur’an verses so and so”


But she didn’t’ talk like that,


She said the Qur’an Says so and so, hiding the real verses, and lying

She said the prophet did so and so, hiding the real events and lying.




Besides, the freedom of religion is something sacred.

It doesn't bother me if someone criticizes my religion, Christianity. It doesn't diminish my faith.


I agree 100% with you in this point



Regards,
Mahmoud
 

Sapiens

Polymathematician
Depends on what you convert to, in most cases the punishment is just a different type of eternal boredom, especially if you lose all the underage virgins chits.
 

Sonofason

Well-Known Member
Easy there guys :D

I guess the best example is comparing the subject hate speech to a criminal leader (kinda like Hitler) that does nothing but led atrocious crimes, but the hater/leader themselves could have done nothing physical directly.

So, does/did Hitler deserve to be punished?
I would suggest that Hitler deserved to be drawn and quartered, at the least.
 

mahmoud mrt

Member
I would say no capital punishment for anything less than murder,



First we have to define the capital punishments, and its constraints



For instances in Islamic law the punishment of murder can be lessened to no punishment at all if the family of the victim accepted to have the “Deya” which is a financial compensation. And the holy Qur’an encourages this pardoning.



The Sharia, capital punishment of theft (cutting the right hand), is only for two kinds of theft, the thief who break to a house and steal, and the one who borrowed something and then lied telling that he did not, and then it was proved that he actually have the borrowed the thing.



So there is no capital punishment for pickpockets, frauds, who steal by deceit, checks fakers, who steals form his parents, or any other kind of theft. For these kinds the law of “Tazeer” which includes prison or lashes.



The courts in Egypt however do not apply the cutting punishment even in the two kinds, still it does not contradict with Sharia, Because they Legal systems in Egypt applies a law in Sharia which says “the judge should prevent the punishment by any reasonable doubt”.


So simply the legal System Makers applies this rule, the doubt is that there is no Just witness in these days, many can witness that someone has stolen for only 100 Egyptian pounds or even less. So cutting the hand of an accused thief would be an irreversible punishment.



Now we get to Adultery, Regarding the holy Qur’an the only punishment for both the already married person or the single person with the constraints that 4 just witnesses had seen the detailed sexual intercourse is 100 Lashes provided the it does not lead to death or handicap.


Keep in Mind that the holy Qur’an and the Prophet encouraged anyone who fell in this sin to keep it a secret and repent to God from it.



The disaster was in the fake Prophet’s traditions, which lead to the law of Stoning to death for any already married person who commits adultery with another person.



Same disaster of fake Prophet’s traditions lead to the punishment of Apostasy by Death., This disaster lead to Muslims killing each other till today.




So the problem actually is the wrong understating and the fake prophet’s traditions along with misinterpreted History events that happened after the prophet’s life.



So to concise my opinion:



1- The Murder Capital Punishment is the only death Punishment that should be allowed, alone with encouragement to accept the financial compensation and pardon.


2- The theft cutting the hand punishment should not be applied due to the lake of just witness in these days. Or only applied if it has been proven with many just witnesses with no single atom of doubt.


3- The only punishment for adultery is 100 Lashes provided that it does not lead to death or handicap.


4- There no any kind of punishment to apostasy.



I think you’ll find that we agree a lot.












raise the age of consent to 18 or at least 16,



I agree totally




Replace amputations as a punishment in the few places where that is still practiced with prison sentences,



As I mentioned :



The theft cutting the hand punishment should not be applied due to the lake of just witness in these days. Or only applied if it has been proven with many just witnesses with no single atom of doubt.




rally against female circumcision,



100% Agreed



and more rights for women, rights that in some places only men have today.



Agreed



I'm not asking you to believe this, but imagine how incredibly far it would go to reduce hatred of the West towards Islam if Islam made some adaptations in the cause of a world peace between Muslims and Westerners, because the West's hatred of Islam is the driving force behind all the West's horribly evil interventions in Islamic countries, If there is any reduction in the West's hatred of Islam, Evil Western leaders will no longer have excuses or support to go to war with Islam.



Agreed



In return the West needs to make some serious concessions of its own to Islam, get their troops the hell out of Muslim countries, Muslims do not need America's help with solving their own religion's, culture's and people's problems,



Agreed






Muslims are going to have to give up their idea of controlling the whole world,



Agreed



Sadly many Muslims believe in the Some Extreme stupid scholars’ opinion justifying the attempt of Muslims to control the whole world.



This is due to the misunderstanding of the Islamic History,



Muslim armies conquered many countries in the middle ages for only one reason: Because the Regimes in control of these countries did one or both of the following two things:


1- Prepared to attack the Muslims states


2- Prevented any Islamic preaching or killed any Muslim preacher or anyone who converts to Islam.



How is this noble reason converted in the extremists minds that Muslims should conquer the whole world, Sad as it is but the blame is on the extreme scholars and fake traditions.



And Westerners are going to have give up their idea of controlling the Muslim world.



I hope so.




In the holy Koran in the final prophecies it talks about two paradises, One in the East (Islam) and one in the West (Christian??)




No, what verses are you talking about, kindly post.




THERE WILL BE NO FINAL HOLOCAUST BETWEEN THE WEST AND THE EAST killing everyone on earth, as some jamat ismaiyala were preaching at my Mosque.



There is no Holocaust, may be the Jamat Preacher was talking about these verses from chapter 17.



4- And We conveyed to the Children of Israel in the Scripture that, "You will surely cause corruption on the earth twice, and you will surely reach [a degree of] great haughtiness.



5- So when the [time of] promise came for the first of them, We sent against you servants of Ours - those of great military might, and they probed [even] into the homes, and it was a promise fulfilled.



6- Then We gave back to you a return victory over them. And We reinforced you with wealth and sons and made you more numerous in manpower



7- [And said], "If you do good, you do good for yourselves; and if you do evil, [you do it] to yourselves." Then when the final promise came, [We sent your enemies] to sadden your faces and to enter the temple in Jerusalem, as they entered it the first time, and to destroy what they had taken over with [total] destruction.



8- [Then Allah said], "It is expected, [if you repent], that your Lord will have mercy upon you. But if you return [to sin], We will return [to punishment]. And We have made Hell, for the disbelievers, a prison-bed."





This verses predict a war in Palestine between Muslims and Jews over the Eastern Jerusalem Aqsa Mosque. But it did not tell the exact time or date, and how it will be.



Keep in mind that these talks about soldiers and buildings, no innocent civilian should be hurt as it’s described clearly in the holy Qur’an and the prophet’s life and actions.




There has to be a Two state solution, just as in Israel/Palestine, there is going to need to be greater separation between the East and the West.



Israel itself does not want peace, Israel is formed by a mixture of Jews from numbers of many cultures, countries and backgrounds, if peace happens these portions will turn against each other and there will be at least disturbance and tension in Israel, or even civil war. Israel needs the Arabs to be enemies in the picture, but to a certain extent, only to have its citizens forgetting their differences.


But If two Arabian Countries unite and defeat the Israeli armies occupying their lands thus causing unacceptable deaths to Israelis, like Egypt and Syria in 1973, then why not have peace with Egypt to get her out of the equation, then help destabilize Syria and divide it at the end.



But as temporary solution, may be if Israel stops dreaming of Building the Jewish temple over the Aqsa Mosque, so may be the final battle will not be in our lives or even our grandchildren lives, I hope so.



Some Easterners living in the West are going to have to return to the East because they are not living peacefully in the West. Some Westerners and their troops stationed in the East, are going to have to return to the West because they are not helping the East at all.



Agreed



I know its only a dream, but I am 52 and I dream of seeing world peace in my lifetime. I believe according to prophecy that world peace is not a fantasy but an attainable but very difficult task. All the Abrahamic religions envision peace at the end of this final war, either we take the steps to accomplish it quickly or more and more people die, we don't have time to be CONSERVATIVE, we don't have time to be FUNDAMENTALISTS, We need to come up with modern solutions to problems that hadn't even begun to exist in the Prophet's(pbuh) time.



sincerely Lyndon Taylor or Mahmoud Abdullah Khan(my muslim name)



I have the same dreams, but sadly not all dreams come true.




Regards,


Mahmoud
 
Last edited:

mahasn ebn sawresho

Well-Known Member
Let see what the holy Quran says about faith and changing it. Well, in this case the holy Quran stated this fact clearly with no single atom of doubt:


(There is no compulsion in religion. The right direction is henceforth distinct from error. And he who rejecteth false deities and believeth in God (Allah) hath grasped a firm hand hold which will never break. God (Allah) is Hearer, Knower.) holy Qur'an Surah 2. Al-Baqara, verse no. 256.



(And if thy Lord willed, all who are in the earth would have believed together. Wouldst thou (Muhammad) compel men until they are believers?.) holy Qur'an Surah 10. Yunus, verse no. 99.



So how on earth did the punishment for apostasy came, well, this relate to the history, we will get to this part later,


Now I state the Islamic Scholar Opinion I Believe in:


Apostasy punishment is a political punishment Not a religious punishment:

Meaning that The normal apostate who does not make crimes against Islam or Muslims, Is left for God (Allah) punishment, No Muslim or Muslim state has the right to punish him ever, but the other apostate who commits the crime of trying to divide or disturb peace in the Muslim state, or make the crime of murdering a Muslim has no privilege, he is in the category of punishment.



This is the opinion I believe in. This is due to the fact that it's the only opinion that does not contradict with the holy Qur'an.


Historically, in the prophet's life the facts and incidents agree with this opinion, by the following:


1- The prophet did not ever punish the normal apostate who did not commit a crime of trying to divide or disturbthe Muslim state, or make the crime of murdering a Muslim.

In fact many Apostates Who were pretending to be Muslims like “Abdullah ibn Aubai ibn Slalol” Actually Insulted the prophet himself, and when some of the companions advised to punish him the prophet refused to punish him.

2- In the peace treaty between the prophet and the Quraish pagans in the 6th year of Higra, the terms clearly states that any apostate who comes to Quraish from the Muslim state is not followed or punished.



What made the opinions the states :”that apostate in the Muslim state is punished by death or imprisonment after a period of discussion with the scholars” popular are the wars of "Redda", and one fake tradition.


These wars “Redda” were in the age of the first (Khalifa) Ruler of the Muslim state after the prophet, he was Abu Bakr. It started because many Arabian tribes after the prophet's death started in apostasy; this was in direct conjunction with dividing the Muslim state and stopping paying the Zakat which is the normal tax system that funded the Muslim state. These wars however do not contradict with the scholar opinion that I bolded, that is in this specific incident apostasy was a political crime not a religious crime.





Regards,

Mahmoud
Of religion other than Islam, it will not accept his religion is in the hereafter of the
Losers

Then the Almighty said "non-religion of Islam as it will not accept it," verse.

Any of the wire path only Bill of God will not accept it, "he
The afterlifeofalkhasri
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
I agree 100% with you in this point

If you agree, why does it bother you that she criticizes the ideology that people got from Islam?

or...do you mean that criticizing Christianity is okay, and criticizing Islam is not?
very objective and impartial
 

mahasn ebn sawresho

Well-Known Member
Why do you use pious here??
No (no compulsion in religion) is a private and not a public
This verse for a specific reason
And after this verse came the fighting verses

This is the proof and evidence

1.
161-Saddi said: landed in the man from the Ansar nicknamed father custody, and had two sons, introduced the comprehensive city dealers carrying oil, when they return to town, Shaalan said the son of Abu Al-Husain, grow side by side till to Christianity, they help, and discharged into the Cham, the Abu Al-Husain told the Messenger of Allah-peace be upon him-said: atalbhma, then Allah almighty: (no compulsion in religion), said the Messenger of Allah-peace be upon him. :Their distanceGodfirstofHamlet. This was before he ordered the Messenger of Allah-peace be upon him-the fight of the people of the book and then copy saying: (no compulsion in religion) and ordered to fight the people of the book in the Surat innocence.
2

[R: 44] 163. tell us Abu Ishaq Ahmad Ibn Ibrahim Al, tell us Abu Bakr Muhammad ibn Ahmad Ibn abdus, tell us Abulhasan Ali bin Ahmed bin Mahfouz, told us Abdullah bin Hashim, told us Abdel Rahman bin Mahdi, from sufyan, from khaseif, Mujahed said: it's a NAS mstrdaine on Jews: qurayza and nadir, when the order of the Prophet-peace be upon him-evacuated their children, said nadir of OUs who mstrdaine including : Lnzehbn with them, and they moistened their religion, it prevented their families and wanted to they force them to Islam, I got: (no compulsion in religion) verse.
3. this verse after the deportation of Jews from Medina
A private and not a public
4. copy the verse did not accept Islam, it will not accept it
I wish I could understand the Qur'an and Islam without frill
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
My opinion both sides are wrong, both sides are behaving way to violently, throughout history, and today, But trying to say the most violent side, that has killed by far the most innocent civilians are the "good guys". give me a break, There are no winners in war, everyone loses.

This is not true, and I guess this thread is showing that the difference between the reactions is abyssal.
In fact, as I said I would like that people criticized Christianity more (and I am a Christian), because I like criticism. Because it is an act of freedom

I can give you an example. Jaclyn is my personal heroine and I really love this video


but...why Christians don't bother her?
why doesn't she receive any death threat for that video?

because we Christians like criticism
 

mahasn ebn sawresho

Well-Known Member
First we have to define the capital punishments, and its constraints



For instances in Islamic law the punishment of murder can be lessened to no punishment at all if the family of the victim accepted to have the “Deya” which is a financial compensation. And the holy Qur’an encourages this pardoning.



The Sharia, capital punishment of theft (cutting the right hand), is only for two kinds of theft, the thief who break to a house and steal, and the one who borrowed something and then lied telling that he did not, and then it was proved that he actually have the borrowed the thing.



So there is no capital punishment for pickpockets, frauds, who steal by deceit, checks fakers, who steals form his parents, or any other kind of theft. For these kinds the law of “Tazeer” which includes prison or lashes.



The courts in Egypt however do not apply the cutting punishment even in the two kinds, still it does not contradict with Sharia, Because they Legal systems in Egypt applies a law in Sharia which says “the judge should prevent the punishment by any reasonable doubt”.


So simply the legal System Makers applies this rule, the doubt is that there is no Just witness in these days, many can witness that someone has stolen for only 100 Egyptian pounds or even less. So cutting the hand of an accused thief would be an irreversible punishment.



Now we get to Adultery, Regarding the holy Qur’an the only punishment for both the already married person or the single person with the constraints that 4 just witnesses had seen the detailed sexual intercourse is 100 Lashes provided the it does not lead to death or handicap.


Keep in Mind that the holy Qur’an and the Prophet encouraged anyone who fell in this sin to keep it a secret and repent to God from it.



The disaster was in the fake Prophet’s traditions, which lead to the law of Stoning to death for any already married person who commits adultery with another person.



Same disaster of fake Prophet’s traditions lead to the punishment of Apostasy by Death., This disaster lead to Muslims killing each other till today.




So the problem actually is the wrong understating and the fake prophet’s traditions along with misinterpreted History events that happened after the prophet’s life.



So to concise my opinion:



1- The Murder Capital Punishment is the only death Punishment that should be allowed, alone with encouragement to accept the financial compensation and pardon.


2- The theft cutting the hand punishment should not be applied due to the lake of just witness in these days. Or only applied if it has been proven with many just witnesses with no single atom of doubt.


3- The only punishment for adultery is 100 Lashes provided that it does not lead to death or handicap.


4- There no any kind of punishment to apostasy.



I think you’ll find that we agree a lot.
















I agree totally








As I mentioned :



The theft cutting the hand punishment should not be applied due to the lake of just witness in these days. Or only applied if it has been proven with many just witnesses with no single atom of doubt.








100% Agreed







Agreed







Agreed







Agreed










Agreed



Sadly many Muslims believe in the Some Extreme stupid scholars’ opinion justifying the attempt of Muslims to control the whole world.



This is due to the misunderstanding of the Islamic History,



Muslim armies conquered many countries in the middle ages for only one reason: Because the Regimes in control of these countries did one or both of the following two things:


1- Prepared to attack the Muslims states


2- Prevented any Islamic preaching or killed any Muslim preacher or anyone who converts to Islam.



How is this noble reason converted in the extremists minds that Muslims should conquer the whole world, Sad as it is but the blame is on the extreme scholars and fake traditions.







I hope so.









No, what verses are you talking about, kindly post.








There is no Holocaust, may be the Jamat Preacher was talking about these verses from chapter 17.



4- And We conveyed to the Children of Israel in the Scripture that, "You will surely cause corruption on the earth twice, and you will surely reach [a degree of] great haughtiness.



5- So when the [time of] promise came for the first of them, We sent against you servants of Ours - those of great military might, and they probed [even] into the homes, and it was a promise fulfilled.



6- Then We gave back to you a return victory over them. And We reinforced you with wealth and sons and made you more numerous in manpower



7- [And said], "If you do good, you do good for yourselves; and if you do evil, [you do it] to yourselves." Then when the final promise came, [We sent your enemies] to sadden your faces and to enter the temple in Jerusalem, as they entered it the first time, and to destroy what they had taken over with [total] destruction.



8- [Then Allah said], "It is expected, [if you repent], that your Lord will have mercy upon you. But if you return [to sin], We will return [to punishment]. And We have made Hell, for the disbelievers, a prison-bed."





This verses predict a war in Palestine between Muslims and Jews over the Eastern Jerusalem Aqsa Mosque. But it did not tell the exact time or date, and how it will be.



Keep in mind that these talks about soldiers and buildings, no innocent civilian should be hurt as it’s described clearly in the holy Qur’an and the prophet’s life and actions.








Israel itself does not want peace, Israel is formed by a mixture of Jews from numbers of many cultures, countries and backgrounds, if peace happens these portions will turn against each other and there will be at least disturbance and tension in Israel, or even civil war. Israel needs the Arabs to be enemies in the picture, but to a certain extent, only to have its citizens forgetting their differences.


But If two Arabian Countries unite and defeat the Israeli armies occupying their lands thus causing unacceptable deaths to Israelis, like Egypt and Syria in 1973, then why not have peace with Egypt to get her out of the equation, then help destabilize Syria and divide it at the end.



But as temporary solution, may be if Israel stops dreaming of Building the Jewish temple over the Aqsa Mosque, so may be the final battle will not be in our lives or even our grandchildren lives, I hope so.







Agreed







I have the same dreams, but sadly not all dreams come true.




Regards,


Mahmoud
What modern health ordered to fight the people until u e Dua..
Modernagreed,including:
How people are fighting and told the Prophet: ordered to fight the people until they say it is uttered, ' none has the right to his money and not me against him and his God. Royfromtrustworthyandsolidmethods,

And God said: and fight them until there is charm. (The charm here in the sense of shirk also said the people of interpretation) as long as the company exists, that is Jihad,
And the Almighty said:
If it passes the sacred months, kill the infidels where you found them and take them and count and were crippled every Observatory

They fought the Pagans all as fight you all and know that God with devotion (36)

Freedom of religion is limited by these verses, but come the tribute or a Treaty of peace. And Allah knows best.
 

mahasn ebn sawresho

Well-Known Member
Lyndon said:
My opinion both sides are wrong, both sides are behaving way to violently, throughout history, and today, But trying to say the most violent side, that has killed by far the most innocent civilians are the "good guys". give me a break, There are no winners in war, everyone loses.
Christianitydid not useviolenceto spread
Are youGeorge BushwenttoIraqtospreadChristianity??
He went there to spread democracy??
Who sentthe invitationtoGeorge w. Bush??
They are Saudi and Kuwaiti Muslims and Egyptians??
West todayisinterestonly
And West away from religion
And this gap sneaking Islam here??
On the grounds that religion is better??
But don't you know??
What is Islam?!?
It's a repressive regime and repressed all freedoms
 

mahasn ebn sawresho

Well-Known Member
Did Israel created by peace or by war ?
Israel was created by the word of God
God's promiseto Abraham
Giventhat landtohis grandchildren
And the descendants of Abraham
IbrahimAbuIshaq
Isaac had 12 tribes of Israel were born
Twelvetribes which
And Joseph was one of the tribes of Benjamin and others
This is the date
Whenthe IsraelitesfromEgypt
It is Godwhoguides themto the promised land
Do youobject to theword of God
 

mahmoud mrt

Member
maybe they mean this



I refuted some of the lies she said in the former post



What is the punishment for converting from Islam? | Page 2 | ReligiousForums.com



I continue to clear up these fakes



She Said that the prophet invented Islam to preserve the Arabian culture in opposition to the Christian and Jewish Culture, This is a complete lie.

For more than 14 years the fight was only between the prophet and the Arabian pagans

The fight did not come to Jews until Jews betrayed the Muslims state, hence trying to murder the prophet, and trying to kill Muslims women ad children as illustrated before.

The fight did not come to Christians until the “Ghasasena” Killed the messenger of the prophet, then afterwards they along with the Byzatines prepared an army to conquer medina and kill all Muslims.

Islam came with a system that is against many crimes that had been constantly done in the Arabian culture.

So what was the origin of the fight between the prophet and the pagans?, to understand this we must understand the economic religious system of those pagans.

Pagans knew that Prophet Ibrahim “Abraham” with his son “Ismail” had built the Kabaa to worship God, They knew God the one the only which meant in the Arabic Language Allah. But with this they believed in many Sub-Gods or Idols, these were introduced to the Arabian culture after the death of Prophet Ibrahim and Ismail by many years. The Pagans believed that these Idols are the mediators between them and God.

But this is not the real reason why they fought the prophet, you see, after hundreds of years of worshipping Idols, the Idols around the Kabaa in Mecca were not just for worship, they were economical treaties, yes every Arabian tribe Idol around the kabaa was a treaty between “Quraish” and that particular tribe to secure the trade caravans of Quraish carrying goods and trade to Syria, Iraq, Palestine, in the north where the Byzantine Roman empire and the Persian Empire were, and to south to Yemen.

So then prophet Muhammad comes with a religion which worships Only God the one the only, and asks them to remove all these Idols first from their hearts then afterwards from around the Kabaa. His only request to them was “Khallo Baynee wa Bayn Alnas” which means”Kindly leave me talk to people, do not prevent people from hearing me”, but “Quraish” feared that if people started believing in Islam that eventually the population in Mecca which will become Muslim will ask to remove the Idols from around the Kabaa, thus destroying the guarantee for the “Quraish” trade caravans security.



So After 13 years of oppression to the Prophet and Muslims in Mekka, Pagan in “Yathreb”: Medina Most of them converted to Islam and agreed willingly to protect the Prophet and Muslims in their country where they formed the majority, Jews tribes were a minority in Medina. Still the Prophet did not oppress them, he signed with hem a treaty called “Sahefa” where they had all religious, cultural, and financial rights. But the Jews were the ones who betrayed this treaty as illustrated before.



Now we get to another lie she said regarding this issue, she said the first military battle between the prophet and Quraish was because the prophet wanted to steal their caravan, what a twist of facts.

The facts are as follows:

1- The about 200 Quraish Muslims in Mekka who immigrated to medina many of them were very wealthy, but Quraish forced them to leave all their money with Quraish leaders in order to allow them to immigrate. With this stolen money from Muslims Quraish prepared a Caravan to Trade with this stolen money and get profit. That was the caravan the prophet attacked.

See how she turns the victim who wants his stolen money back to be the oppressor.

2- Quraish refused to let the Arabian tribes listen to the prophet, even against the advice some of its own older politicians, hence it started to attack the new Muslims state with three wars.

3- When the Muslim state was strong enough to counter attack the prophet did not choose war, else he chose to sign a peace treaty with Quraish which was called “Alhudaybeya” Treaty at year 6 higri, and the holy Quran described this peace treaty as the great “Fath” which means the great opening, while even most Muslims did not understand why it’s an opening. But then they realized the wisdom of the Holy Qur’an and the prophet, Because by this peace treaty the Arabian tribes started listing to Muslims, and in only two years the Muslim numbers were Multiplied by 4.

4- Only when Quraish betrayed and violated this treaty by killing over 20 Muslims in Mekka, some even inside the Kabaa itself, then the prophet attacked Mekka, but even in this attack he managed to surprise them so as not to have to kill anyone, they surrendered and he pardoned them all.







Now we get to another lie she told, she said the prophet had 11 wives along with sex slaves thus implying that he was a sex obsessed person.



Here are the facts:



1- The first marriage of the prophet was with “Khadija”, he was 25 years old, she was 40 years old, he stayed with her without marring any other wife for 25 years till she died, he loved her very dearly.

2- Then for two years he did not mary anyone because he was in grieve by his los in “Khadija”.

3- Then he married Sawda who was old, he married her to honor her because her older husband died in Habasha.

4- Afterwards he Married Aisha who was the daughter of his dearest companion “Abu Bakr”, she had reached puberty, her age is debatable, opinions vary form 9 years old to 21 years old, that is because the Arabs did not concern of registering the age, keep in mind that they grew up much more sooner and earlier than girls of nowadays. While even nowadays some girls reach puberty and grow very early.

The prophet loved Aisha dearly; he even died in her arms.

5- All other marriages were either a humanitarian marriage to honor the widows of a Dead companion, or political marriages to fasten the relation between that particular tribe and the Medina State. All these marriages were in the last 8 years of his life while he was busy by Preaching, politics, defensive wars, etc.







Again this kind of speeches full of twisting and lies are much disrespected, however they should not be punished by any means since they are just words not including summoning for any military act.





Regards,

Mahmoud
 
Last edited:

YmirGF

Bodhisattva in Recovery
...than the Western nations with their Christian traditions, WRONG, have you forgotten about the crusades, the Spanish conquest of South and Central america, and Mexico. The American slaughter of the native Indians, the Inquisition, WWI, WWII, Korea Vietnam, get my drift...
It is highly disingenuous to describe conflicts from WW1 onwards as being Christian conflicts. None of them were about Christianity. Including Korea and Viet Nam is practically laughable. But hey, anything to make a point, eh? Islamic conquest of the Indian sub-continent ring any bells?
 

FearGod

Freedom Of Mind
Israel was created by the word of God
God's promiseto Abraham
Giventhat landtohis grandchildren
And the descendants of Abraham
IbrahimAbuIshaq
Isaac had 12 tribes of Israel were born
Twelvetribes which
And Joseph was one of the tribes of Benjamin and others
This is the date
Whenthe IsraelitesfromEgypt
It is Godwhoguides themto the promised land
Do youobject to theword of God

Exactly, it is also the word of God that they'll take the land of Palestine at the end of time and they'll be trapped and will be killed in the events of armageddon.
 

mahmoud mrt

Member
If you agree, why does it bother you that she criticizes the ideology that people got from Islam?


or...do you mean that criticizing Christianity is okay, and criticizing Islam is not?

very objective and impartial




It bothers me because she is lying, clear lies, this is not criticism, it’s as if I say that Jesus worshiped idols and mas murdered population.



You can criticize Islam as much as you want, and I will respect you, but when you lie about the prophet life and the holy Qur’an clear lies not even mentioning that this is from the folowing scholar or history book, how can you expect me to respect this.



Again this kind of speeches full of twisting and lies are much disrespected, however they should not be punished by any means since they are just words not including summoning for any military act.


Regards

Mahmoud
 
Top