What is the sex rules of your religion or philosophy?

[Leahpolitan_icecream]

I would not harm anybody, whatever they want.
Would you?

Maybe it's a kink

 

[oldbadger]

Maybe it's a kink

Yeah... I know that some folks like pain, but 'hurt' stretches beyond that imo.

 

[Guitar's Cry]

I said otherwise

You did a subjective idea too, you made up your rule

Sorry if I misinterpreted!

Which rule of mine are you referring to?

 

[mangalavara]

What is withholding, is it not to say no when married? My ma said that before so maybe its the same

Withholding as in unfairly depriving one's spouse of sex.

 

[Polymath257]

No, they don't remember, its disgusting to think about I don't mean what you think no physical harm but it is evil

You made up your own rule I made up mine, you made up none of our business, I say it is

It isn't evil if nobody is harmed. For consenting adults, nobody is harmed.

I find it to be immoral to try to tell people how to run their lives if they are not harming anyone. I don't see any reason why I or anyone else should conform to your ideas of what is or is not disgusting. It is an opinion. And, if you try to interfere with someone's life for doing something that harms nobody, they would be filly justified in telling you to buzz off. I would support them saying so.

 

[Polymath257]

Yeah... I know that some folks like pain, but 'hurt' stretches beyond that imo.

Exactly. Pain need not be harm. But permanent damage is.

Desiring permanent damage (self-injury, for example) is reason to seek professional help.

I don't do pain. Again, not my thing. But I don't judge what turns other people on if it harms nobody.

 

[GardenLady]

It is this in my opinion: "the only moral sexual act is natural marital relations open to life."

What about people who are irrevocably infertile due to age (menopause), disease, or surgery?

 

[Lain]

What about people who are irrevocably infertile due to age (menopause), disease, or surgery?

The infertile can do the specific behavior spoken of in the rule.

 

[Evangelicalhumanist]

As long as there's consent...
That's pretty much the only rule.

I'd add one more:

Make every sexual partner feel as good as they make you feel. There's a pretty good chance they'll come back.

 

[lukethethird]

What is the sex rules of your religion or philosophy?
If someone breaks a rule ye get a little slap, anywhere ye like.

 

[Sand Dancer]

It is this in my opinion: "the only moral sexual act is natural marital relations open to life."

As far as I know this is a complete rule covering all circumstances of human sexuality. If you want to know, in my religion/opinion at least, whether or not an act is possibly moral simply bounce it off this statement and you're good to go.

What does "...open to life" mean?

 

[Lain]

What does "...open to life" mean?

Primarily in mind is not being contraceptive, such as using a condom or birth control.

 

[Evangelicalhumanist]

Primarily in mind is not being contraceptive, such as using a condom or birth control.

Well, then, I'm safe. My lover and I use neither, but it is extravagently unlikely that either one of us will conceive.

 

[Leahpolitan_icecream]

Sorry if I misinterpreted!

Which rule of mine are you referring to?

"Disgusting" and "gross" are subjective and pronouncing death for a subjective judgement seems worse that the crime. But again, two consenting adults? Who's to say otherwise? Certainly not someone pronouncing a death sentence.

Made up, so I made up mine, I just won't approve of that

 

[Leahpolitan_icecream]

Withholding as in unfairly depriving one's spouse of sex.

That broke up many marriages I think

 

[Leahpolitan_icecream]

It isn't evil if nobody is harmed. For consenting adults, nobody is harmed.

I find it to be immoral to try to tell people how to run their lives if they are not harming anyone. I don't see any reason why I or anyone else should conform to your ideas of what is or is not disgusting. It is an opinion. And, if you try to interfere with someone's life for doing something that harms nobody, they would be filly justified in telling you to buzz off. I would support them saying so.

I find it to be moral to not let people abuse each other and act like animals

 

[blü 2]

Title question

Some do not hate gay people, some forbid trans people, some allow child marriage, some mutilate genitals, some have many wives, some allow masturbation and some try to have sex with incubus

What are your rules?

In all sexual encounters, equality, honesty, good will (including doing no harm) and not breaching faith with others.

 

[Evangelicalhumanist]

I find it to be moral to not let people abuse each other and act like animals

And how would you define "abuse each other and act like animals?"

As I understand it, animals get it on, too. Do you think, therefore, that we humans should stop doing that altogether?

 

[Saint Frankenstein]

And how would you define "abuse each other and act like animals?"

As I understand it, animals get it on, too. Do you think, therefore, that we humans should stop doing that altogether?

It was from earlier in the thread, talking about a father and son banging each other. Apparently some people think that sickness is perfectly fine as long as they "consent". (I guess Armin Meiwes is off the hook now since consent defines morality these days.)

 

[Saint Frankenstein]

That's how I feel with any kind of sex.

Sex is kinda really gross in general if you think about it...
It's only attraction and arousal that dont make it so I guess.

It's really no more gross than our bodies are on their own. Kissing is gross, so is eating, peeing and pooping. But that's the bodies we have and it's worth a laugh, being all squishy and full of various fluids. So I find sex more funny than anything else. You're definitely not focused on that during sex.