• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

What is wrong with those people who support homosexuality practices?

Status
Not open for further replies.

sayak83

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
Some of them even stated that anal sex no more dangerous or harmful than vaginal sex.

I'm not putting any forum users on the spot, sorry.
Without sourcing where and who said, your claims are unsubstantiated and I remain skeptical of their veracity.
 

SomeRandom

Still learning to be wise
Staff member
Premium Member
May peace be with you,
Jesus was a Torah following Jew. The Torah specifically prohibits LGBT activity. Some related OT verses include:

(2. Leviticus 18:22) " Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination." (3. Leviticus 20:13) "If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them."
So Jesus went around condemning gay people? Interesting, that always seems to get left off his commandments to his followers.
74c62195bf2715b77242592ffcd36537.jpg
 

The Kilted Heathen

Crow FreyjasmaðR
Why is that? I think those people who support homosexuality don't really care about others.
You think that people who support their friends and family, don't care about others... You've said some really ignorant stuff, but I think this one takes the cake.

Those people are just trying to make themselves look like a good guy, but in reality they do not care about you.
Gee, what other group or culture does that sound like. Hmm... What other group loves to play the victim, but doesn't care one iota about the people who they demand respect, tolerance, and compliance from?

I like my Islamophobic people on this forums, because they are so funny. They are my second best favorites.
And yet somehow, it's perfectly okay for you to be homophobic, idolphobic, Paganpobic, Westernphobic, and whatever other bigotry you can muster up. If anything, it's statements like yours that are causing "islamophobia". Times like these (and other disgusting things you've said in this thread) I wish there were negative ratings.
 

The Kilted Heathen

Crow FreyjasmaðR
Without sourcing where and who said, your claims are unsubstantiated and I remain skeptical of their veracity.
I can help you out, because I'm one of the users that he suddenly is adverse to putting on the spot.

Yes, I said that anal sex is no more harmful than vaginal sex, because it's true. Vaginal sex can lead to yeast infections, UTI's, cervical trauma, and (if you're really unlucky) a broken or sprained penis. Vaginal sex presents the same - if not more - risk for STD's. Heterosexuals also engage in anal and oral sex, yet somehow these religious zealots only care when it's two men - lesbian relationships quite often fly under the radar.

However one thing I did not say - soviet - is that homosexuality is "good for your health" like it's some folkish remedy for a cold.
 

Shad

Veteran Member
So, the question is, what is wrong with those people who support homosexuality practices?

A lot of people support the idea that consenting adults can form relationships with whom they please. This does not mean support of the practice itself. To parallel this. I support the idea of your being able to practice your religion. This does not mean I support your view of Islam.

Do not they not care about the facts?

Depends on the above points.

Deep down do they not care about others well-being?

Caring about people does not equate violating people's rights. For example many do not support smoking cigarettes. They will advice people why they should not smoke but do not grab cigarette from any smoker they see.

Are they like one of those girls who goes out to the mall with an ugly friend just to stand out? Maybe deep down they think of themselves as ugly ducklings, and so in order to make them look charming they support homosexuality practices and state that it’s healthy. But deep down they know it’s not.

Not for the majority. However there are some people that get satisfaction or for their own purposes. As a parallel look up "White Knight"

Those people don't care about the facts

No they just care more about other facts such various rights in Western Civilization. Look those up.

They want their sexual freedom without responsibility.

This can apply to anyone. Also most people accept the responsibilities of sexual freedom. If they don't they are idiots.
 

sayak83

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
I can help you out, because I'm one of the users that he suddenly is adverse to putting on the spot.

Yes, I said that anal sex is no more harmful than vaginal sex, because it's true. Vaginal sex can lead to yeast infections, UTI's, cervical trauma, and (if you're really unlucky) a broken or sprained penis. Vaginal sex presents the same - if not more - risk for STD's. Heterosexuals also engage in anal and oral sex, yet somehow these religious zealots only care when it's two men - lesbian relationships quite often fly under the radar.

However one thing I did not say - soviet - is that homosexuality is "good for your health" like it's some folkish remedy for a cold.
I am pretty sure that there is good medical literature showing that the risk of STDs including HIV is creater for anal sex than vaginal sex. But its not relevant of course. If some sexual acts are a somewhat more riskier than other, one simply needs to be more careful, that is it.
 

The Kilted Heathen

Crow FreyjasmaðR
The only thing that I can find that increases the risk is the tendency to not use condoms during anal sex, as there's no risk for pregnancy and (honestly) condoms suck. So that skews the data. There is the complication that the colon doesn't self-lubricate (but people aren't dumb, they use lubrication), yet to juxtapose that some vaginas also have that problem.

So really it seems to be a 50:50 thing. Anal sex just has a higher "potential risk" with everything considered.
 

oldbadger

Skanky Old Mongrel!

Aha!..... so easy.......
So a 'closed' page from Center for Disease Control in 2009 was copied into an agenda filled extreme religion site Christian Apologetics & Research Ministry and then patronised by a Soviet as a cynical attack upon gays?

Hey! Matey! most regulars on this Forum are 'quick-as-a-flash' to pick up on muck like this.

Do you really support websites that give defend Christianity?
 

Kirran

Premium Member
Why are you promoting Christianity? You should be promoting Islam and try to revert some of those users? Don't you think so?
 

SomeRandom

Still learning to be wise
Staff member
Premium Member
Some of them even stated that anal sex no more dangerous or harmful than vaginal sex.

I'm not putting any forum users on the spot, sorry.
Uhh, it's not. Unless you think vaginal sex doesn't come with the myriad of Sexually Transmitted Diseases?
Fun fact, it does.
Another fun fact, anal sex is not homosexual sex. Ever hear of lesbians? Heterosexual couples often have anal. Some even prefer it.

Nuance. Do you know what it means?
 
According to the study carried out by Center for Disease Control in 2009, indicates that only 2% of U.S. population is gay but 61% of these people are heavily affected by new HIV infections more than any other group in the United States.

So, the question is, what is wrong with those people who support homosexuality practices? Do not they not care about the facts? Deep down do they not care about others well-being? Are they like one of those girls who goes out to the mall with an ugly friend just to stand out? Maybe deep down they think of themselves as ugly ducklings, and so in order to make them look charming they support homosexuality practices and state that it’s healthy. But deep down they know it’s not.

Those people don't care about the facts. Instead, they want their agenda promoted. They want their sexual freedom without responsibility. They, like so many tyrants in history, want to force their minority opinion on the majority to satisfy their own appetites.

IF only 2% in the US are gay I am lead to wonder why the percentage is so much lower here.
Actually it is well established that as high as 75% in the gay community are only situationally out. They may be out only to select friends and closeted to everyone else in their life. And they certainly are not going to respond truthfully to a study.
Now how about a link to the study?
 

Riders

Well-Known Member
If your not talking about GLBT issues of AMerica I cant relate that's the first thing. SO judging another country is ignorant.

I saw a special on tv that was about the African countries with the highest AIDS rate is them, its not homosexuals in AMerica, so your facts are wrong in the OP.

The OP also said more then 60 percent of GLBTS have Aids,uh excuse me, Lesbians, its practically obsolete very low.

Oprah did do a special on this. The country says they have a superstition that says if you rape a woman, you can get rid of aids, and a lot of people out there are dying including millions of women who have been raped. It was started by an ape who was infected with aids who raped someone.

Unfortunately its all ignorance. A lot of AIDS victems in America are leading full happy lives, we have meds out here and drugs that help AIDS victems live along time.

Its just seems like theres a lot of lies in the first post written as some kind of accusation at America, truthfully I just have hard time communicating to that. Its hard to work with a lot of ignorance ina post like that.
 

Riders

Well-Known Member
This is an excerpt about lesbian HIV

The vulnerability of lesbians and women who have sex with women (WSW) to HIV infection is a complicated public health issue that is perplexing to some and ignored by many. In fact, female-to-female sexual contact is a much less efficient route of HIV transmission when compared to male/male or male/female sexual contact. According to the CDC, there are no confirmed cases of HIV from female-to-female transmission.
With more than 15 years of experience with lesbians and WSW, the Lesbian AIDS Project (LAP) at Gay Men’s Health Crisis (GMHC) knows first hand that there are lesbians and WSW living with HIV. We set about to research the risks lesbians and WSW face in this, the third decade of the HIV epidemic.

It went on to explain high risk behavior for lesbians to be at risk for HIV is drug use, drug addicts who use dirty needles.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top