• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

What is Your Disbelief?

PureX

Veteran Member
I'm certainly not talking about anything unreal except when it come to the supernatural.
Well, that's just your own silly bias.

There is no way for any human to determine what "supernatural" even means apart from some imposed subjective semantic regime.
Heat can be physically felt/perceived and measured. Nothing non-physical about that.
The "work" on the other hand ...
 

Soandso

ᛋᛏᚨᚾᛞ ᛋᚢᚱᛖ
Ok, but why can't such a God be a physical entity?

I don't propose that it can't. I'm an agnostic atheist, not a hard atheist. It very well could be that there is a godlike physical entity out there, but if there is one then we, as a species, are ignorant to it's actual existence imo

Every god story out there carries with it the same compelling evidence for it's existence as ghosts, vampires, or any other apparitional being that never leaves the realm of anecdotal attestation. Lacks substance, but makes for good campfire stories. Ultimately, this is what we are talking about - myths and legends that people weave to solve a paradox that they have created for themselves

nature is what it is. Everything we can see about it is self sustaining and perpetuating in a way that we can measure and observe, and what we don't know becomes illuminated in time. Adding an outside being that is secretly pulling the strings behind the scenes seems superfluous
 

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
No, it isn't. That's just a brain scan and doesn't tell you anything about love except that brain regions activate in response to stimuli. And you didn't really respond to my post, either.

Yes it can and i responded in the way it works. Or can you tell me any reason why love is not electro chemical stimuli?
 

George-ananda

Advaita Vedanta, Theosophy, Spiritualism
Premium Member
Dark matter, whatever it is, affect gravitational fields which we can detect. Whatever it is, since it effects the physical is physical.
What you say is the paranormal, ok fine. Who is to say this is not the result of physical processes?
Dark Matter cannot be directly detected. It is only known of indirectly.

And In a broader use of the word ‘physical’ I think the paranormal can be explained physically but involves matter and dimensional planes not currently detectable by our three-dimensional senses and instruments. Things like astral/soul bodies are physical in the broader use of the word.

The difference between us is that you only accept that which can be detected by our senses and instruments. I argue the paranormal is indirect evidence that there is more than the physical plane through which life expresses itself. We can’t see spirits (except perhaps in cases of semi-materialization) but we can see their effects (paranormal activity).
 

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
Which, even if true, is irrelevant given day-to-day experiences of life and living patently do not reduce down to "brain chemicals." It is so absurd to suggest so I vehemently reject the extremist nonsense that is substance monism of any kind, physicalism or otherwise. Nobody experiences their actual lives as "brain chemicals." Sorry. Might as well say all reality reduces down to mathematics in spite of nobody actually experiencing life as a series of mathematical equations.

The brain is far from irrelevant, heart beat, breathing, walking, sleeping etc, etc, everything is controlled by the brain
 

Nakosis

Non-Binary Physicalist
Premium Member
The actual human experience.

The reason why your kids would be upset if you told them your love is just brain chemistry.

The biochemical response is the experience.
IDK if it would matter as I would also explain that the experience itself doesn't change. If you feel emotions you feel emotions regardless of the source. If you feel happy, you feel happy. Does the mechanics really matter?
We respond the same, the experience is the same. Just because we understand the mechanics doesn't change the experience itself.

I understand it is a disconnect for most. It is like when you understand the physical process of a magic trick, the magic is lost and we feel robbed of the sense of wonderment. Like finding out Santa Claus in not real. However you can still enjoy Christmas even knowing Santa isn't real.
 

crossfire

LHP Mercuræn Feminist Heretic Bully ☿
Premium Member
Again, informational. I can physical encode and store the attributes of a perfect circle on a computer and have it physically reproduced on a monitor. All of this informational processing, storage and display is done by known physical processes. Why do you think your brain needs to be any different?
Informational models might be physical, but the thing being modeled might not perfectly physically exist except as a concept. (See Plato's World of Forms.)

Artwork is likewise a model of the Artist's conception, but might not physically exist except in fantasy. I see a perfect circle as such a fantasy.
 

Nakosis

Non-Binary Physicalist
Premium Member
Dark Matter cannot be directly detected. It is only known of indirectly.

And In a broader use of the word ‘physical’ I think the paranormal can be explained physically but involves matter and dimensional planes not currently detectable by our three-dimensional senses and instruments. Things like astral/soul bodies are physical in the broader use of the word.

The difference between us is that you only accept that which can be detected by our senses and instruments. I argue the paranormal is indirect evidence that there is more than the physical plane through which life expresses itself. We can’t see spirits (except perhaps in cases of semi-materialization) but we can see their effects (paranormal activity).

If you can detect the effects of something even indirectly then it fits within my definition of physical.
It there is evidence that can be seen, then its cause, whatever it is, falls under this definition of physical.
We may not know what it is or even disagree about what it is but it would fit the definition of physical.
 

Nakosis

Non-Binary Physicalist
Premium Member
Informational models might be physical, but the thing being modeled might not perfectly physically exist except as a concept. (See Plato's World of Forms.)

Artwork is likewise a model of the Artist's conception, but might not physically exist except in fantasy. I see a perfect circle as such a fantasy.

That's fine, I'm just saying the idea, the fantasy is stored as information physically.
 

Nakosis

Non-Binary Physicalist
Premium Member
Well, that's just your own silly bias.

There is no way for any human to determine what "supernatural" even means apart from some imposed subjective semantic regime.

I agree because it has no physical elements.

The "work" on the other hand ...

Work is a understood physical process in which energy is changed in form. So still nothing here that is not physical.
 

Saint Frankenstein

Here for the ride
Premium Member
Yet there is a detail explanation for it. The physical process. You think there is something missing from this. I don't understand what you think is missing. Except perhaps the wonderment which comes from not knowing the physical process perhaps?
I posted my view on it here:
 
Top