• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

What is your issue with Democratic Socialism?

Epic Beard Man

Bearded Philosopher
It does not take into account personal responsibility. It ignores that there are horrible jobs which are necessary in the modern world people would not do without incentives and burdens. Who wants to be a janitor by choice instead of circumstance? It promotes envy and greed in the masses under the false idea people's labour is worth what each individual wants it to be worth instead of the market. It is an fantasy.

Democrat Socialism is not Social Democracy. It is still Socialism ergo a branch of Communism. You have fallen for the bait and switch. Look up the terms you are using.

Fail post
 

Valjean

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Scandinavia still has capitalism. It pays the bills.
Of course, but much of the commons is socialized.

Liberals aren't advocating pure communism. You're presenting a straw man.
Liberals are proposing more public participation in, and oversight of The Commons.
 

Shad

Veteran Member
Of course, but much of the commons is socialized.

Yes.

Liberals aren't advocating pure communism. You're presenting a straw man.

Nope as I never made that claim. I pointed out social democracy is not democratic socialism.

Liberals are proposing more public participation in, and oversight of The Commons.

Liberals are not democratic socialists.
 

Shad

Veteran Member
Fire departments, school systems, police, roads, social security, Medicare, etc, are socialist in nature.

Those are not socialist. Fire fighters do not own their equipment. Paving companies do not own the roads. Something being part of the public institution does not make it socialist.
 

Valjean

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Yes.
Nope as I never made that claim. I pointed out social democracy is not democratic socialism.
Liberals are not democratic socialists.
I think some definitions are needed here.
Those are not socialist. Fire fighters do not own their equipment. Paving companies do not own the roads. Something being part of the public institution does not make it socialist.
Definitions?
 
Top