• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

What kind of pantheist are you?

What kind of pantheist are you?


  • Total voters
    37

The Hammer

Skald
Premium Member
I voted Monist Naturalistic, but after taking the quiz I realized I am actually Dualist, which makes more sense anyways. I scored 100% with that and 94% with Pagan, which makes sense since I consider myself to be a Pantheistic Pagan, lol. Glad that it is at least a semi accurate quiz haha.

edit: Now if only I could unvote and revote correctly :p
 
Last edited:

The Sum of Awe

Brought to you by the moment that spacetime began.
Staff member
Premium Member
I believe all is one, but I also do believe in different planes of existences; spiritual, mental, and physical, but everything is physical processes.
 

Sundance

pursuing the Divine Beloved
Premium Member
That is a good description for dualism as I understand but at any rate I'd still be pantheist. I don't currently have a reason to think the data is anything other than something resonating off of something physical or the data is actually something physical.

edit: I think that naturally panentheism is advocating dualism though one can still argue it is one yet separate, we are talking more about substance. This dualism can still happen just within the confines of the universe which would be pantheistic.

idav, you'd be right in saying that dualism can occur within the “confines" of the universe. (That is, if I believed in such a thing as confining the endless, which I don't.)
 

idav

Being
Premium Member
idav, you'd be right in saying that dualism can occur within the “confines" of the universe. (That is, if I believed in such a thing as confining the endless, which I don't.)

Beyond that it is still relevant. Not one thing can make everything? Would it have to be two things? I stop with necessitating one thing, if an infinite other things needed to be then it just becomes less and less likely.
 

Sundance

pursuing the Divine Beloved
Premium Member
Beyond that it is still relevant. Not one thing can make everything? Would it have to be two things? I stop with necessitating one thing, if an infinite other things needed to be then it just becomes less and less likely.

Touché.
 
Top