• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

What other religions give science credit?

Taylor Seraphim

Taylor Seraphim

Angel of Reason
First Baseman said:
Carbon dating is based on assumption. Prove it isn't. You can't. It is.
Click to expand...

Predictable, testable, and repeatable results okay to you?

First Baseman said:
The overwhelming majority of scientists in America are atheists and make fun of any scientist who believes in any sort of creation.
Click to expand...

Bull****.
http://www.pewforum.org/2009/11/05/scientists-and-belief/

First Baseman said:
Science is based on making guesses and speculating. You think Einstein knew his theories were 100% correct when he conceived them? No, they are still being tested and will continue to be tested until proven true or false.
Click to expand...

Again bull****.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method

So do you have any more bull**** to heap this way or are you done?
 
S

Smart_Guy

...
Premium Member
First Baseman said:
Well, to be fair, a Roman Catholic priest first came up with Big Bang Theory. Atheists pick up on anything they can bend to support their stances.
Click to expand...

I didn't say everyone took science only from Muslims :D

Taylor Seraphim said:
Evidence please.
Click to expand...

Err... it is well known! One good example is Jabir Ibn Hayyan who came up with algebra as we know it today (thus the name). Also, who discovered using alcohol for medical uses is a Muslim scientist called Al-Razi.

Here, a list of Muslim scientists who have contributed significantly to science and civilization:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Muslim_scientists

You really never heard Muslims and their contributions to science?
 
Taylor Seraphim

Taylor Seraphim

Angel of Reason
Smart_Guy said:
I didn't say everyone took science only from Muslims :D



Err... it is well known! One good example is Jabir Ibn Hayyan who came up with algebra as we know it today (thus the name). Also, who discovered using alcohol for medical uses is a Muslim scientist called Al-Razi.

Here, a list of Muslim scientists who have contributed significantly to science and civilization:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Muslim_scientists

You really never heard Muslims and their contributions to science?
Click to expand...

I know there are Muslms that contributed to science.

But when you make a claim you need to back it up.

Also when someone does science it odes not belong to them, so your not borrowing "muslim science" any more than you can be borrowing atheist science.
 
S

Smart_Guy

...
Premium Member
Taylor Seraphim said:
I know there are Muslms that contributed to science.

But when you make a claim you need to back it up.

Also when someone does science it odes not belong to them, so your not borrowing "muslim science" any more than you can be borrowing atheist science.
Click to expand...

Did you even look at the dates in the link? Doesn't that even give clues?
 
S

Smart_Guy

...
Premium Member
Taylor Seraphim said:
im not saying you do not have evidence now.
Click to expand...

Well, this is one of those moments that one doesn't know how to prove something very known :D

Seriously now, you really never heard of it? It all over the place. Check this one out:

And this educational presentation:

As for backing it up, can you give any non Muslim name before Jabir Ibn Hayyan for algebra and Al-Razi for alcohol who date before them? I don't think you can. And algebra and alcohol are basic inventions that certainly had their information borrowed by non Muslims that they can exist today.

I'm only answering you because you started it. Debating in this forum is against the rules. I could be wrong, but that can be addressed somewhere else, not in this thread. You are welcome to start a new thread in the appropriate forum for that, and I personally welcome it.
 
Taylor Seraphim

Taylor Seraphim

Angel of Reason
Smart_Guy said:
Well, this is one of those moments that one doesn't know how to prove something very known :D

Seriously now, you really never heard of it? It all over the place. Check this one out:

And this educational presentation:

As for backing it up, can you give any non Muslim name before Jabir Ibn Hayyan for algebra and Al-Razi for alcohol who date before them? I don't think you can. And algebra and alcohol are basic inventions that certainly had their information borrowed by non Muslims that they can exist today.

I'm only answering you because you started it. Debating in this forum is against the rules. I could be wrong, but that can be addressed somewhere else, not in this thread. You are welcome to start a new thread in the appropriate forum for that, and I personally welcome it.
Click to expand...

For the SECOND TIME.

I am NOT denying your sources, I just asked that you brought them up.

By any deity that will listen please tell me why this man cannot read my posts!
 
1137

1137

Here until I storm off again
Premium Member
The western left hand path is almost always accepting of science, sometimes simply believing it to be limited. I'd say a big part of this is how new it is, being founded long after science started getting the upper hand, but that can't be it as tons of new age, pseudo scientific garbage rose around the same time.
 
First Baseman

First Baseman

Retired athlete
Taylor Seraphim said:
Predictable, testable, and repeatable results okay to you?



Bull****.
http://www.pewforum.org/2009/11/05/scientists-and-belief/



Again bull****.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method

So do you have any more bull**** to heap this way or are you done?
Click to expand...

No, predictable, repeatable test results are just predictable and repeatable. There are also test results for dating methods like carbon dating that show the method is incorrect. I suppose you don't study those, however.

You look at 2 websites and call Bull****? You do realize that there are many websites with many more stats, right?
 
Riverwolf

Riverwolf

Amateur Rambler / Proud Ergi
Premium Member
My religion does not go against the current scientific consensus on any matter, now or in the future. This can happen because we don't have any scriptures, nor bound by doctrine to "believe" any one thing at minimum.
 
Subhankar Zac

Subhankar Zac

Hare Krishna,Hare Krishna,
First Baseman said:
I give science all the credit in the world. Science completely supports creation. See icr.org.

And when science is composed of biased atheist Scientists who like to speculate and make guesses, I'd just as soon watch a sitcom, at least the sitcom is funny.
Click to expand...


Science evolves with new evidence and doesn't go aroyd killing people those who have different ideas for 1500 years

Science doesn't reject other ideas simply based on dogma and fear of hell.

Science supports creation, just not the one you vehemently support while funding other parts as gibberish.
 
Subhankar Zac

Subhankar Zac

Hare Krishna,Hare Krishna,
I'll say in terms of Religion, Hinduism would be close.
Though there are 3000-4500 scriptures available, still overall it supports many ideas.

Majority of the ideas come outside scriptures since writtimg was invented at around 1800-1200 BCE in India and pantheistic ideas excused from before 7000 BCE, the supposed time of Ramayana.

So, outside monotheistic faiths that are restrictive and abhors other ideas, Hinduism which has over thousands of DIFFERENT RELIGIONS... Has different ideas as well without bias or political motive to controll masses.

Buddhism, Taoism, Jainism, Confucianism, neo paganism... All are taught to evolved as they have no fear mongering dogma with them and are subjected to evolution.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top