What Shall We Do about Radar-Confirmed UFOs?

[Shad]

There is no need to bother me with your nonsense.

Hilarious coming from one that uses UFO sites as their source.

If you come up with an assertion that you can demonstrate to be true, be sure to let me know. So far all you've done is show your own claims to be false.

You are using the claim that reports are from the military not I. You have no evidence that it is a military report. I can point that out.

The fact that you have an anti-extraterrestrial religion doesn't mean it's true.

No I have a view that claims should be backed by evidence. You have yet to provide anything close to evidence of aliens but rather have evidence of dead links, shoddy reports and nobodies making grand claims.

 

[Nous]

Hilarious coming from one that uses UFO sites as their source.



You are using the claim that reports are from the military not I. You have no evidence that it is a military report. I can point that out.



No I have a view that claims should be backed by evidence. You have yet to provide anything close to evidence of aliens but rather have evidence of dead links, shoddy reports and nobodies making grand claims.

So, in addition to providing a video that refutes your claim that the Mexican Air Force video was of oil rig flares, your claims about the Belgian UFOs rest on, not any evidence, but merely your belief that the "Belgian Air Force report by Major Lambrechts, VS 3/Ctl-Met 1" is false. Correct?

And providing the evidence that the BAF report by Major Lambrechts is not false demonstrates your failure to account for the BAF's facts of the Belgian UFOs. Correct?

 

[Kilgore Trout]

I've never known anyone who becomes so agitated by a few undisputed facts about UFOs. What a stupid religion.

Me neither. It's rather fascinating.

 

[Nous]

Me neither. It's rather fascinating.

So you can't figure out anything more productive to do than trolling in discussion forums? Consider reading a book.

 

[Kilgore Trout]

So you can't figure out anything more productive to do than trolling in discussion forums? Consider reading a book.

Your non sequiturs are almost as entertaining as your facts.

 

[Nous]

So, in addition to providing a video that refutes your claim that the Mexican Air Force video was of oil rig flares, your claims about the Belgian UFOs rest on, not any evidence, but merely your belief that the "Belgian Air Force report by Major Lambrechts, VS 3/Ctl-Met 1" is false. Correct?

And providing the evidence that the BAF report by Major Lambrechts is not false demonstrates your failure to account for the BAF's facts of the Belgian UFOs. Correct?

No answers, Shad?

Perhaps you're afraid of learning that the BAF report is not false?

 

[Shad]

No answers, Shad?

No as I have not been online before you posted. You could have checked my profile, instead you made assumptions

Perhaps you're afraid of learning that the BAF report is not false?

Another assertion which you could of falsified but didn't bother.

So, in addition to providing a video that refutes your claim that the Mexican Air Force video was of oil rig flares, your claims about the Belgian UFOs rest on, not any evidence, but merely your belief that the "Belgian Air Force report by Major Lambrechts, VS 3/Ctl-Met 1" is false.

There is also the video regarding your Belgium claim. So... no. More so the report has includes reports from police which is not a function the military but civil authority. There are citation for said police reports. The source you use contains nothing to link it to any military besides claim it is a military report. No stationary, no source for what is a public document from a real source. No flight plans, no intercept times, and no visual contact by the pilots. The claim of jamming is nonsense when the craft makes no effort to conceal itself from ground radar nor ground observations. The lights and all make stealth nonsense. You accept claims with no basis just accept what UFO sites tell you at face value.

And providing the evidence that the BAF report by Major Lambrechts is not false demonstrates your failure to account for the BAF's facts of the Belgian UFOs.

You claimed it was a report without evidence. Anything that is claimed without evidence can be dismissed. You have no source that has credibility.

Classic argument from ignorance

Let me know when you can cite credible sources.