• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

What the Heck is Going on in France with the Burkini??

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
Then tell that to the Muslims who force women to cover up or be subjected to harassment and ****-shaming. Tell that to those who perpetuate a culture that tells people that views of women like this are acceptable because they don't cover up. Gods be good, there's a member of this board espousing exactly the sort of opinion that a forced body-covering culture causes & supports yet I'm the problem for trying to stand against it?!

I will and I do. You’ll find me doing it on this very board.

I didn’t say you are a problem. We’re just having a discussion.

That's great, really.
It is, isn’t it? And in the non-sarcastic way too. :)

Sadly anecdotal evidence does not a misogynist culture unmake.

It seems to me that you’ve provided the same amount of anecdotal evidence. Yet yours is supposed to be superior to mine and used to judge a very large group of people.

Anyway, maybe this will help:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hijab_by_country#Muslim_world
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...nd-niqab-banned-or-worn-around-the-world.html
http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tan...opriate-attire-for-women-in-muslim-countries/
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...ity-countries-rules-women-dress-a7229881.html

In an ideal world this would be perfect but since Islam tolerates no cultural voices other than its own it should not be tolerated.
How do you know this?
Wait, really? Could you elaborate further on that please? This is the first I've heard of it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1984_anti-Sikh_riots
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chhōtā_Ghallūghārā


I wouldn't say so much it's a case of forcing their beliefs on everyone else as opposed to being intolerant (violently so) of non-Muslims. The North Africans didn't appreciate non-Muslims taking pictures containing Muslim women and got violent because they couldn't intimidate the tourists into leaving the beach - as if it was theirs to begin with. This isn't the first time Muslims have got violent in Corsica either; Arab youths attacked fire fighters last December.

I just think you’re generalizing too much.

I’ve seen big caucasian guys beat guys to a pulp for looking at their girlfriend. What should we conclude from that?

Okay, hands up, I was waaaay wrong on that. Thanks for illuminating my ignorance.
Happy to help. :)
 

Saint Frankenstein

Here for the ride
Premium Member
Of course it does; but you didn't say that. You said Islamophobia which is a meaningless term. We already have a phrase for anti-Muslim bigotry. It's 'anti-Muslim bigotry'. And being against Islam is not bigoted. Sorry to tell you.
You sound like the people who say that homophobia and transphobia doesn't exist. Let's try some examples: "Being against gay relationships and gay sex isn't bigoted...sorry to tell you." "Being against polytheism isn't bigoted...sorry to tell you." "Being against interracial relationships isn't bigoted...sorry to tell you." You're not even trying hard to be convincing here. You should know that I'm not that stupid. Give me a break, dear.

Because European/non-Islamic culture is superior to Islamic culture. Enough relativist bull****; it needs to be said.
What is "European/non-Islamic culture"? What is "Islamic culture"? They're not concrete things. Those are phantoms that exist in your head only. You really want to play that card, with Europe's nasty history and present issues?

Forcing women to cover themselves is antithetical to our way of life and quite obviously perpetuates a culture which causes a great deal of harm.
The only people in this thread who are supporting forcing women to do anything are the people who want to make laws forcing them to dress in a certain way. Why can't you just mind your own business?
If this argument shifted to Muslims demanding polygynous marriage would you still be as accommodating in the name of multiculturalism?
I don't support polygamous marriage for a myriad of reasons and that has nothing to do with Islam. In North America, most polygamists are Christians. There's also very hardline Christian and Jewish sects who control the lives and bodies of women to extraordinary lengths. Haredi Jewish women, for example. But who cares about that; Muslims are the hated Others of the moment.
And this is about women continuing a culture that causes them, as a group, great harm.
Who are you to decide what causes women "great harm"? A woman wearing a hijab at work or school is greatly harming herself?
It'll become our business when women walking through Muslim neighbourhoods in Europe start being harassed because they're dressed 'immodestly'.
But the police harassing Muslim women and forcing them to take off their clothes is any better how?
Why should I have a say in her choice of attire? I shouldn't because I didn't inform the anti-burkini law because I'm not a French citizen; I'm merely expressing my opinion that mandatory veiling & body-covering is wrong and should be out-lawed.
And if a woman chooses to dress a certain way? What if a female relative of yours converts to Islam and decides to wear the hijab? What will you do then?
There are laws which make it a crime to walk around naked but I don't see you campaigning against them.
I don't have a problem with public nudity. It's not banned everywhere. If a proposition came up to legalize public nudity where it has been banned, I'd likely vote for it.
Society defined what people can & can't wear long before the issue of the burkini or even the full-face veil cropped up but most liberals (myself included) ignore them because they don't offend our sensibilities.
That's not something I have to wrestle with in my conscious, so speak for yourself. I don't support the state policing what people wear.
I actually agree. There's plenty wrong with this situation and neither side of the argument comes out smelling particularly rosy. However I find the greater inconsistency exists in liberals sticking up for & defending a religious culture which is notably illiberal & repressive when it is in control of society.
I'm not a liberal. I'm also a religious person. Catholicism has a lot in common with Islam, more than any other religion.
Muslim men quite obviously aren't oppressed because they're the ones who determine what Islamic culture is; because Islam is inherently misogynistic.
Except that it isn't.
The veil is a Muslimah's expression of her religious belief because men have decided it is; Muslimahs should cover their bodies to avoid arousing the lusts of men because men decided that was what should happen even though Muhammad caught one of his companions staring lustily at a woman and making her uncomfortable so he forcibly turned the companion's head away so he couldn't look at her.
You've been reading too much Salafist crap. The hijab is more of a cultural thing than a purely religious issue. Not all Muslim women even wear the veil.
This is one of the biggest failures of feminism in the Western world. It's quite willing to smash the patriarchy unless it's got anything to do with Muslims or Islam. Then the patriarchy can remain in place as long as Muslim women continue claiming they're empowered by their chains. Muslim feminists challenge Sharia law because it discriminates in favour of men; Western feminists don't because that's 'Islamophobic'.
Actually, what's being denounced is bigoted white Westerners continuing their cultural imperialism and supremacism against those they seek to dominate. Feminism has often been used as a tool by Western imperialism. Many modern feminists realize this and are trying to rectify that problem by boosting the reach of the voices of non-white and non-Western women. Why do you ignore what Muslim women say about the issue? All I see is men yapping about it on both sides.
Muslim feminists challenge FGM but from Western feminists there's nothing but silence on the issue because to challenge that would be racist or culturally imperialist. Some argue Muhammad was a visionary with ideas millennia ahead of his time but cue the awkward silence from feminism when you point out Muhammad married and ****ed a child who, at best, was starting puberty when Muhammad consummated his marriage. Child marriage is another thing feminists in Muslim countries also fight against.

Feminism in the West needs to decide whether it's for or against the religion that promotes & perpetuates these aspects of patriarchy. If it's against them, great. Feminists should have no trouble tearing Islamic patriarchy a new ******* just like it does with non-Islamic patriarchy. If it's not against Islam doing these things then it should drop the act of being an ideology that empowers women because apparently oppressing women is only bad if you're white or non-Muslim.
As has been pointed out, there are many feminists who are fighting against the toxic aspects within the Muslim community (none of which are exclusive to it).
Now you can see how laughable your ranting looks to me.
 

The Emperor of Mankind

Currently the galaxy's spookiest paraplegic
You sound like the people who say that homophobia and transphobia doesn't exist. Let's try some examples: "Being against gay relationships and gay sex isn't bigoted...sorry to tell you." "Being against polytheism isn't bigoted...sorry to tell you." "Being against interracial relationships isn't bigoted...sorry to tell you." You're not even trying hard to be convincing here. You should know that I'm not that stupid. Give me a break, dear.

Flawed analogies because homosexuality, transgenderism et al are not inherently intolerant, do not cause harm to anyone in and of themselves and do not promote bigotry, violence or oppression. Why on earth should I, as a polytheist, tolerate or show respect to a belief system that is so hostile to polytheists that no country with a Muslim majority is safe for polytheists to practice their beliefs, or have their beliefs officially recognised & protected by law; that would, if in the social majority, deny me my right to worship as I see fit or gather with my friends for such? In Islam, polytheists are one of the worst kinds of people - those who commit shirk.

For that matter, why are you so determined to stick up for a religious culture that proves hostile to those who refuse to fit into Islam's binary view of gender?

What is "European/non-Islamic culture"?

Cultures that arose, developed or currently exist in Europe or in a context where Islam was not the predominant belief system.


What is "Islamic culture"?

Cultures that arose in a context where Islam was the dominant belief system.


They're not concrete things. Those are phantoms that exist in your head only.

So are things like nations, or agreements, or stories. We find meaning where we can. Does the fact none of these things are tangible mean that we're not allowed to take any of them seriously or learn from them?


You really want to play that card, with Europe's nasty history and present issues?

Look, if you think I'm arguing that Europe's history or peoples are better or less violent than Islam, you're wrong. I'm not. Europeans have done, hell, are doing some awful things. And while the good things don't cancel out the harm, they should be worth a mention. Non-Islamic cultures have given the world more positive things & more advances than Islamic culture(s).


The only people in this thread who are supporting forcing women to do anything are the people who want to make laws forcing them to dress in a certain way. Why can't you just mind your own business?

Because there are Muslims who ****-shame and harass Muslim women for not covering up when they walk through the streets. In places like Iran & Saudi Arabia women can be harassed or even raped for not being 'correctly covered'. And the latter is importing its toxic brand of Wahhabism to Western countries! What do you think will be the result of this? Here's a story from Egypt from four years ago. While I hope things have improved since then, it highlights the narrative supporters of the ban are trying to fight.

I don't support polygamous marriage for a myriad of reasons and that has nothing to do with Islam. In North America, most polygamists are Christians. There's also very hardline Christian and Jewish sects who control the lives and bodies of women to extraordinary lengths. Haredi Jewish women, for example. But who cares about that; Muslims are the hated Others of the moment.

So you'll criticise polygamous marriage when it's in a Judeo-Christian context but when it's in an Islamic context... silence.


Who are you to decide what causes women "great harm"?

A person with an opinion and eyes to see.


A woman wearing a hijab at work or school is greatly harming herself?

You know that's not what I said. I said voluntarily covering aid & abets a culture that obligates women to cover themselves and take responsibility for the lusts, thoughts & words of men.


But the police harassing Muslim women and forcing them to take off their clothes is any better how?

No, it isn't. There's no easy answer to this situation. If we try and do something about this we're misogynists, cultural imperialists and so on who deny women their freedom. On the other hand if we do nothing we allow Islamism to continue sneaking its way into Europe through the trojan horse of (as ironic as this may sound) religious liberty.


What if a female relative of yours converts to Islam and decides to wear the hijab? What will you do then?

I'd tell her I'm concerned about how Islam views women and how it expects them to take the responsibility for men's thoughts & desires through covering their bodies.


I don't have a problem with public nudity. It's not banned everywhere. If a proposition came up to legalize public nudity where it has been banned, I'd likely vote for it.

But presumably you're not as vociferous in your support for legalising it as you are for lifting the burkini ban.


That's not something I have to wrestle with in my conscious, so speak for yourself. I don't support the state policing what people wear.

I'm glad for you. Really, I am. It must be great not having to deal with massive cognitive dissonance on this issue on a daily basis.


I'm not a liberal. I'm also a religious person. Catholicism has a lot in common with Islam, more than any other religion.

With their comparable religious history, I can understand that.


Except that it isn't.

Really? Does Sharia law not consider a woman's testimony to be worth half of a man's? Does Islam not make husband-to-wife divorce far far easier than wife-to-husband divorce? Do Sharia law courts not discriminate against women?

And if Islam is not misogynistic, can you explain verses like this, this, this or this? Care to tell me how giving women half the inheritance of a man isn't misogyny? Care to tell me how instructions to beat disobedient wives isn't misogyny?


You've been reading too much Salafist crap. The hijab is more of a cultural thing than a purely religious issue. Not all Muslim women even wear the veil.

The thing is I'm not just talking about the hijab; but all coverings women are expected, even pressured by society to wear including the niqab or the jilbab.


Actually, what's being denounced is bigoted white Westerners continuing their cultural imperialism and supremacism against those they seek to dominate. Feminism has often been used as a tool by Western imperialism. Many modern feminists realize this and are trying to rectify that problem by boosting the reach of the voices of non-white and non-Western women. Why do you ignore what Muslim women say about the issue? All I see is men yapping about it on both sides.

This seems to only be a problem when it's non-Muslims doing it to Muslims. Apparently it's bigoted for Europeans to 'force' their culture onto migrants who are coming to Europe to live but not for Muslims to pressure non-Muslims to do likewise when living in Muslim countries.


As has been pointed out, there are many feminists who are fighting against the toxic aspects within the Muslim community (none of which are exclusive to it).

And I was way wrong about my claims in that respect. I understand that now.


Now you can see how laughable your ranting looks to me.

But not nearly as funny as you claiming that Islam is not an inherently misogynist religion. Do you also believe Islam doesn't perpetuate patriarchy?
 
Last edited:
Top