So ─ given a benevolent and omnipotent God ─ why did Jesus have to die?No, here this 'template' is nothing more than trying to 'explain away' as best as possible
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
So ─ given a benevolent and omnipotent God ─ why did Jesus have to die?No, here this 'template' is nothing more than trying to 'explain away' as best as possible
Ah, so ─ you're saying ─ God is NOT benevolent but malicious, NOT magnanimous but petty ... but isn't it self-contradictory that such a nasty individual would go out of [his] way to let humans off the hook at all?
Though I agree it would account for the cruelty.
If I were omniscient and omnipotent and perfect and benevolent ─ if I've had any successes, they might be with benevolence ─ I'd have perfectly known before I made the universe everything that would ever happen in it, so I must have (in an aberrant moment of spite or boredom) intended the cruelty gratuitously.
Can you think of any other explanation?
It was also the greatest event in history and the greatest demonstration of love .Sure, But WHY did God so decide?
If we don't understand why it HAD to be a tormented death then we don't understand anything.
So Jesus sets out to get himself killed by crucifixion, refuses opportunities to escape, succeeds in getting killed, pushes the blame onto the Jews, and calls it a good weekend's work, right?It was also the greatest event in history and the greatest demonstration of love .
No, he set out to live the human experience. Then he tried to carry his gospel to the Jews who had been chosen to receive it. They rejected it and had Jesus killed. He returned from the grave and appeared to believers.So Jesus sets out to get himself killed by crucifixion, refuses opportunities to escape, succeeds in getting killed, pushes the blame onto the Jews, and calls it a good weekend's work, right?
Never such love, right?
Why? Why? Why?
I believe these verses address your questions .So Jesus sets out to get himself killed by crucifixion, refuses opportunities to escape, succeeds in getting killed, pushes the blame onto the Jews, and calls it a good weekend's work, right?
Never such love, right?
Why? Why? Why?
How does that explain WHY Jesus had to die? He says he already has that power, and anyway it's been available direct from God up till then.I believe these verses address your questions .
John 10:18
“No man taketh it from me, but I lay it down of myself. I have power to lay it down, and I have power to take it again. This commandment have I received of my Father.”
Saved from wrath? God knows [he] has a foul temper so [he] sends [his] delegate to serve as a buffer?Rom 5
6¶For when we were yet without strength, in due time Christ died for the ungodly.
7For scarcely for a righteous man will one die: yet peradventure for a good man some would even dare to die.
8But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us.
9Much more then, being now justified by his blood, we shall be saved from wrath through him.
BUT WHY DOES THE DELEGATE HAVE TO DIE?10For if, when we were enemies, we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son, much more, being reconciled, we shall be saved by his life.
You'd have rejected it to if you'd been in their shoes, wouldn't you? As you know, "messiah" means "one anointed by the Jewish priesthood" for being an important civil, military or religious leader of the Jews ─ and Jesus was never any of those things and Jesus was never anointed. So you wouldn't have paid much attention to some guy in the street who said, "I'm the son of God and the world as you know it will end shortly," would you?No, he set out to live the human experience. Then he tried to carry his gospel to the Jews who had been chosen to receive it. They rejected it
But Jesus' mission was to exactly that, to get himself killed. You can hardly blame the Jews if he lured them into obliging him, can you? Look at all the chances to escape that he deliberately refused to take,and had Jesus killed. He returned from the grave and appeared to believers.
That's not what the story says. Instead it says what I said in my previous para.The fact that the Jews had blood on their hands is no ones fault but their own.
The Jews developed wrong ideas about a Messiah and a material kingdom. Jesus was a spiritual teacher who taught a spiritual kingdom.You'd have rejected it to if you'd been in their shoes, wouldn't you? As you know, "messiah" means "one anointed by the Jewish priesthood" for being an important civil, military or religious leader of the Jews ─ and Jesus was never any of those things and Jesus was never anointed. So you wouldn't have paid much attention to some guy in the street who said, "I'm the son of God and the world as you know it will end shortly," would you?
But Jesus' mission was to exactly that, to get himself killed. You can hardly blame the Jews if he lured them into obliging him, can you? Look at all the chances to escape that he deliberately refused to take,
That's not what the story says. Instead it says what I said in my previous para.
A part of this i see ,demonstrates who he is , his love, mercy and glory . I'm just grateful he did .You'd have rejected it to if you'd been in their shoes, wouldn't you? As you know, "messiah" means "one anointed by the Jewish priesthood" for being an important civil, military or religious leader of the Jews ─ and Jesus was never any of those things and Jesus was never anointed. So you wouldn't have paid much attention to some guy in the street who said, "I'm the son of God and the world as you know it will end shortly," would you?
But Jesus' mission was to exactly that, to get himself killed. You can hardly blame the Jews if he lured them into obliging him, can you? Look at all the chances to escape that he deliberately refused to take,
That's not what the story says. Instead it says what I said in my previous para.
Which brings us back to where we started? WHY was it necessary for Jesus to die? What did it achieve that a benevolent omnipotent God couldn't achieve bloodlessly?
If you want the inner working details of what Jesus accomplished through his life on the cross, through his burial , then resurrection, wow ! this would take a life time and we still wouldn't have all the details . I mean to fully understand and grasp . So its a bit rich to say " oh why didn't he just snap his fingers " . Muslims say this all the time " why didn't God just forgive ? " its because their god is arbitrary and capricious.This is why we have the bible. To come to know God and understand .You'd have rejected it to if you'd been in their shoes, wouldn't you? As you know, "messiah" means "one anointed by the Jewish priesthood" for being an important civil, military or religious leader of the Jews ─ and Jesus was never any of those things and Jesus was never anointed. So you wouldn't have paid much attention to some guy in the street who said, "I'm the son of God and the world as you know it will end shortly," would you?
But Jesus' mission was to exactly that, to get himself killed. You can hardly blame the Jews if he lured them into obliging him, can you? Look at all the chances to escape that he deliberately refused to take,
That's not what the story says. Instead it says what I said in my previous para.
Which brings us back to where we started? WHY was it necessary for Jesus to die? What did it achieve that a benevolent omnipotent God couldn't achieve bloodlessly?
And where is this in Genesis?I'm of the theory that it was Eve.
Adam's love for her. He knew they were in serious trouble. They probably would not make it. But he couldn't let her face it alone. He would rather suffer her fate, than to watch her die that day alone.
.
And where is this in Genesis?
So the stories are inadequate and you're adding to the content?It's a theory.
A deduction.
A hypothesis.
Can you envision a scenario where, after finding Eve weeping with the partially eaten fruit in her hand, Adam telling her: "wow Eve, you've really screwed up now. I gotta go. I need to put some space between us."
I can't.
If Adam was a thug, God might have ended the whole demonstration right there.
But she was the bone of his bones, the flesh of his flesh.
Peaceful Sabbath.
So why did God let the Hebrews go so long with the wrong idea, and wasn't more clear in the Bible? 3000 years is a long time to let a mistake go, don't you think?The Jews developed wrong ideas about a Messiah and a material kingdom. Jesus was a spiritual teacher who taught a spiritual kingdom.
Do you think God was caught off guard when Jesus was killed?You keep saying that Jesus came to be killed, that's simply not true.
So Jesus being killed WAS part of the plan.If Jesus vanished on his own then his message may have been lost. The resurrection was his last and most spectacular miracle which provided a huge boost to the faith of the apostles. Some of the apostles gave up their lives as well and many more Christians.
As religions evolve we are free to speculate and grow in understanding without God micromanaging everything. Teachers and prophets are sent, we interpret things on our own.So why did God let the Hebrews go so long with the wrong idea, and wasn't more clear in the Bible? 3000 years is a long time to let a mistake go, don't you think?
Do you think God was caught off guard when Jesus was killed?
So Jesus being killed WAS part of the plan.
So the stories are inadequate and you're adding to the content?
Let's note that if God is perfect it will create exactly what it wants. If it wanted some other outcome to the fate of A&E then it should have designed them the way it wanted. The story implies that God was caught off guard by A&E's behavior. That's bad luck.
Can you think of any other explanation?
Monty Python's Life of Brian explained how this works.As religions evolve we are free to speculate and grow in understanding without God micromanaging everything. Teachers and prophets are sent, we interpret things on our own.
So God was caught off guard, and didn't foresee the future events.Killing Jesus wasn't part of the original plan or will of God. The cross seems to be plan B which developed after the rejection of the Original, pre-cross Gospel that Jesus preached to the Jews.
Adds a lot of confusion and uncertainty.Not so much inadequate, just some dots to connect. Or blanks to fill in.
The explanations by believers suggest God is more like a fallible, ordinary human than omniscient and perfect.I know, that's what the Atheists say. If God was so smart, He would have made a perfect world.
It could be that, from time to time, the work of His hand pleases Him.
Peaceful Sabbath.