Trailblazer
Veteran Member
What did I dislike that was second hand?You disliked second hand, but you yourself are up to at the very least fourth hand.
At least try to be consistent.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
What did I dislike that was second hand?You disliked second hand, but you yourself are up to at the very least fourth hand.
At least try to be consistent.
Mere existence. And weirdly enough that is not a quality particular to atheists.Some atheists seem to think they are worthy of hearing God speak to them directly, but what makes them worthy of that?
Hardly. Believers keep telling me that their particular god wants me to believe that he/she/they exists. If their god wants me to believe then that god ought to do the things that would induce me to believe. The fact that the only evidences are the irrational texts and ceremonies of religion can do nothing but push me in the other direction entirely.What seems so odd to me is that these atheists do not even think in terms of worthiness, it is as if God owes them something.
Point being you are up to at least five players in your telephone game.What is your point?
After you tell me we can determine if what I said applies to the conversation.
That's right. He could have been speaking the truth even if he was not a true prophet.This is simply not true!
He could be speaking truth in a symbolic way. Not an objectively true way, but an important way.
Tom
It is not a game.Point being you are up to at least five players in your telephone game.
I do not see it there.
It is a classic game Chinese whispers.It is not a game.
Not the least bit surprised.I do not see it there.
the creation is a reflection of the Artistthe evidence that God provides
I am not going to even dignify that with an answer because I have already addressed that inane comment umpteen million times.Your evidence is... a guy said it.
Except that when all the fluff, window dressing, glitter, glam, etc. is removed from your claim, that is exactly what it all boils down to.I am not going to even dignify that with an answer because I have already addressed that inane comment umpteen million times.
God is not limited but not everyone deserves a message from God.I see Baha'u'llah as one of those ancient people. Not as ancient as most "Messengers", but he is one of them. His conception of God is still too primitive to allow mass communication. B's God is still too limited to give everyone An Important Message From God.
I don't believe that God is that limited.
Tom
It is interesting that you ask me that because Left Coast asked me to post a thread on that and I told him I would do so next weekend. It will be called something like this:Why are your beliefs more true or trustworthy than his?
I don't mean to me. I don't believe either of you. I mean why is your experience with B* so much more compelling to you? Maybe @Windwalker is the Messenger for the 21st century?
Not asking you to accept my word. I'm merely sharing personal experience, one which shaped my entire life. That's personal to me. Do with that whatever has meaning to you.I must disagree.
Humans are remarkably capable of self-illusion, AKA delusion.
Nothing personal. I've known lots of people who firmly believe that they had inexplicable experiences. Some are here on RF.
Tom
That depends on the person, his education and intelligence. The question is whether he was speaking any truth? What he wrote was completely rhetoric, just a repeat, except for his claim of being the manifested Allah.That's right. He could have been speaking the truth even if he was not a true prophet.
What I should have said is that there would be no reason for me to believe that what he wrote is the objective truth from God unless he was a true prophet.
If it is not in Abrahamic religions forum, you would surely find me posting in the thread.It will be called something like this:
What convinced me that Baha’u’llah was a Messenger of God
Never.I am not going to even dignify that with an answer because I have already addressed that inane comment umpteen million times.
Absolutely NOT. The mere fact that you exist does not make you worthy of hearing from God directly!Mere existence. And weirdly enough that is not a quality particular to atheists.
God does not need anyone's belief. The only reason God wants anyone to believe is for their own benefit.Hardly. Believers keep telling me that their particular god wants me to believe that he/she/they exists. If their god wants me to believe then that god ought to do the things that would induce me to believe. The fact that the only evidences are the irrational texts and ceremonies of religion can do nothing but push me in the other direction entirely.
No, they are not the same thing. To say something is "right" or "wrong" that is pointing to some form of objective agreement, upon some propositional truth. Nothing I have said is stating that. I have shared personal experience. I have not stated anything you need to "believe in".I think you are splitting a non-existent hair there. If someone says that their claim is undeniably right, they are saying that it is undeniably real.
My experience, matches that of others who share a similar experience. That qualifies it as something more than just my personal experience, or interpretation of something. It's like when someone describes the taste of an orange, using whatever metaphors are at their disposal. If someone else has tasted and orange, they'd say, yeah, they're describing an orange. So there is something to the quality of the experience that makes more than just one person's experience.Now, if all that you meant was that you experience was real, but you are not claiming that there is actually an absolute in reality to experience, then I would agree with you. You had a real experience. I would not question that. What I question is your explanation for that experience.
But you see, you are assuming I have all sorts of beliefs propped up around my experience, as if somehow those were proofs for some sort of presumed theology. As I said, how I think about it, changes and grows. The symbols I use, the ways I speak to myself about it, evolve. They are not fixed in some theology, or some belief system. At the end, they are nothing more than just ways to describe something wholly beyond description.I have had my own experiences. (Thanks for assuming) But no, that won't do it. Because what I (or anyone) correctly believes to be true is indistinguishable from what one mistakenly believes to be true, no matter how strong or absolute that belief is. Absolute certain is folly. Which is my point.
The really sad part is that you never got the message from God.The really sad part is your claim that Chinese whispers is the best your god can do to communicate with you