• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

What would falsify the theory of evolution?

Jose Fly

Fisker of men
I am coming to the conclusion that it may be best just to address the flawed reasoning even if the points are literally the ancient dead for others anyway. Then leave it at that, unless I am in a mood to deal with the insistent denial. It is an interesting phenomenon though. I agree with a certain fascination myself.
I agree about posting initial rebuttals, but in most places where EvC is even still a thing, the ratio of E's to C's is significantly skewed to the E side. So most times I don't really feel the need to pile on. I remember one thread where I counted something like 29 E's all responding to one C! :D

It is all that I can conclude, given how many times I have read "If man descended from monkeys, how come there are still monkeys?" or similar nonsense. It must be the best that can be found to attack science.
Yup. Everything on the Talk Origins index is at least 16 years old and it's been a long time since I've seen any creationist make an argument that wasn't on there.

BTW, to @syo what's your deal? Why are you playing this silly little coy game instead of just stating your point outright? Step up and explain rather than making everyone guess. Not a good look.
 

Jose Fly

Fisker of men
I repeat ''evolution is false because of entropy". Prove me wrong.
Why, because you say so? Are you expecting folks here to be like, "Well, since Syo said evolution is false because of entropy, I guess it's true"?

Who do you think you are?
 

syo

Well-Known Member
I agree about posting initial rebuttals, but in most places where EvC is even still a thing, the ratio of E's to C's is significantly skewed to the E side. So most times I don't really feel the need to pile on. I remember one thread where I counted something like 29 E's all responding to one C! :D


Yup. Everything on the Talk Origins index is at least 16 years old and it's been a long time since I've seen any creationist make an argument that wasn't on there.

BTW, to @syo what's your deal? Why are you playing this silly little coy game instead of just stating your point outright? Step up and explain rather than making everyone guess. Not a good look.
In Wikipedia there's evolution and Darwinism and entropy. What am i supposed to write??? Can't you search???
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Honey, all you say is gibberish. I repeat ''evolution is false because of entropy". Prove me wrong.
LOL! No need. You took on the burden of proof. You appear to lack the education to understand a refutation. You do not understand the burden of proof in this situation.

When you made your first claim you took on a burden of proof. I do not have to educate every person that comes here and denies reality,.
 

syo

Well-Known Member
LOL! No need. You took on the burden of proof. You appear to lack the education to understand a refutation. You do not understand the burden of proof in this situation.

When you made your first claim you took on a burden of proof. I do not have to educate every person that comes here and denies reality,.
More gibberish.
 

rational experiences

Veteran Member
Machines do also. Evolve said a man theist science agreement.

Mind invents machine past biology puts metals on the wrong side. As earths evolution cold gases water oxygen supports living biology only.

Man gained design awareness ancient machine on other side via carbon. In memories when he destroyed machine. Burnt his machine to a carbon heat destroying all life.

Star mass he said that had formed out of dusts came from black hole and had hit earth.

Life destroyed.

Life renewed as dinosaurs with trees. Human says I was in the nature garden first. No machines then no giant life then.

Then giant life cold blooded lizard dinosaurs.....memories only. With garden nature.

Knew when star mass returned it was small and it only burnt clouds put old machine designs of his man's design back in clouds.

Advice memory said my machine got saved as cloud gases. Like human life had. Lying. But it's all advised in just a human mind memory.

Does all comparisons as a God behaviour human theist.

However says my machine always correctly advised me. So it has.

So before his machine got saved in mass transported in time to just being cloud. His machine plus star mass destroyed life on earth but life survived.

Talking in memories about humans now. Falsifying evolution terms. As they do.

As no season existed with dinosaur. And heavens held a higher water mass humid. Which he as a God hasn't yet achieved with his idea the sky is his net to control. As men by machine. Evolution by human theist.

How humans don't own evolution it's word was in fact G O D a concept how Cooling actualised holding of mass..the creator explanation.

It's why God the man has to be told humans don't evolve into machines nor are we part machines. Clouds tricked you falsified all advices as holographic visions.

Stories form. ....fake.

As he knows everything by machine he says.

So today humans doing holographic machine movie themes all destruction of life proves the hologram didn't come forward and materialise.

Yet he seems to want it to...as he said the hologram image became the material. It emerges he says.

Why the theory of evolution as said by men lies. As you're only human.

Back in time order...men built machine all life destroyed huge star mass came. Carbon end of all things.

Life began again nature dinosaur. Huge star mass returned. Life ended again.

Humans living. Small star mass returned machine in cloud.

Two massive earth destructive histories preceding machine only becoming cloud mass a vision holographic man's memory.

Machine came forward says mind from a hologram. Design.
 
Last edited:

rational experiences

Veteran Member
Evolution human theme.

Between two machine types inside of earths heavens.

Men theist pretends two machine histories invented all life on earth as a reaction.

As if we were created inside man's machine as gods machine.

A sun machine above a man's machine he wants to react below. For resource not life.

Another type of theist story about evolution.

Why the legal church founding said don't look back nor theory about life's death.

Why evolution theorising isn't real.
 

syo

Well-Known Member
Okey doke.
from wikipedia

''Evolution is change in the heritable characteristics of biological populations over successive generations.''
''Entropy is a scientific concept, as well as a measurable physical property, that is most commonly associated with a state of disorder, randomness, or uncertainty.''
These two combined lead unavoidably in intelligent design.

What else? I support intelligent design and evolution is like the misleading tip of the iceberg. There is more to evolution. Evolution needs time to show what has always been there before it appears (intelligent design). When fish got their eyes, these eyes weren't invented at the specific time, they were appeared at that time, but they always will exist (intelligent design).

Now, entropy needs intelligent design. By definition. And it leads to a very big chain of ''evolutions'' which again I think ''evolutions'' are the tip of the iceberg.
 

Jose Fly

Fisker of men
from wikipedia

''Evolution is change in the heritable characteristics of biological populations over successive generations.''
''Entropy is a scientific concept, as well as a measurable physical property, that is most commonly associated with a state of disorder, randomness, or uncertainty.''
These two combined lead unavoidably in intelligent design.
Why?

What else? I support intelligent design and evolution is like the misleading tip of the iceberg. There is more to evolution. Evolution needs time to show what has always been there before it appears (intelligent design). When fish got their eyes, these eyes weren't invented at the specific time, they were appeared at that time, but they always will exist (intelligent design).
That makes no sense.

Now, entropy needs intelligent design. By definition. And it leads to a very big chain of ''evolutions'' which again I think ''evolutions'' are the tip of the iceberg.
Neither does this.
 

Jose Fly

Fisker of men
Without intelligent design, the evolutionary changes wouldn't happen because entropy wouldn't function properly.
So you believe every decrease in entropy in the history of the universe was intelligently designed?
 
Top