rojse
RF Addict
...I of course, being the big scary anti-religionistic atheist, had a big rant in front of my TV...
Talking to your television must be a sign of insanity.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
...I of course, being the big scary anti-religionistic atheist, had a big rant in front of my TV...
When I was eight, ATARI was just coming out.
Did you have a Colecovision and a Commodore 64 as well? Those along with my Atari made up our trifecta of entertainment when I was a child. :yes:
Now I know what most of you are thinking, "What about babies? What about STD's?" Well, what about them? I'll bet a hundred bucks your kids have heard and understand the dangers of that stuff. Why? Public schools. They cram all that crap down kids' throughts by like age 10. Why is it that we can teach our kids about AIDS and condoms at age 10, and then forbid them to have sex for almost a whole decade?
I dunno, to me, when a teen feels ready for sex, they are ready. Even if they are not, I am a firm believer in the lessons learned from trial and error. Am I the only one out there that holds this radical, "politically incorrect" view? I would love to hear thoughts and insight on this topic.
Casual sex is not necessarily meaningless.
Hahaha that's rich. You still say "most adults" and "Usually say."I hope you realize why you can't make a generalization here, because once you do, you will understand what I am basing my arguement on.There may be some out there that can, but rarely the ones who think they can. Ask most adults who had sex as a teen and thought they were mature enough at the time and they usually say now that they really weren't. Hindsight is 20/20 you know.
Exactly. that's why abstinence has it's flaws. Also, proving my point, that is why sex is something between parents and kids, not a third party such as school or TV.Not all teens know how to use protection thanks to public schools that are stuck in the "abstinence only" programs.
Minors don't need supervision because they are minors, minors need supervision because 99% of them are reckless. However, I just want people to be aware that there still is that remaining 1% of teens that are legitimently adults, in the sense that they are very matureand resposible. You know, I think kids can be MORE mature than adults sometimes.they ARE minors and still require adult supervision
Why? How so? They are going to do it behind my back if they want it bad enough anyway. I'd rather establish open mindedness so that my kids can feel comfortable with me knowing what's going on, that way, if anything gets out of control, I know how to react.it would be irresponsible parenting to give the impression that it's okay to go out and have sex as a kid.
Sigh. It's not my fault I'm such a stud.You're 19 and you obviously started having sex at least a couple years ago
Yes I'm offended, but no, it's not illogical. Look at me. I had sex early (age 14, just for the record) and yet:and now are all offended at the commercial for no logical reason.
...abstinence has it's flaws. Also, proving my point, that is why sex is something between parents and kids...
Apparently, you had MUCH better sex ed than I did. Mine consisted of "condoms don't work."Now I know what most of you are thinking, "What about babies? What about STD's?" Well, what about them? I'll bet a hundred bucks your kids have heard and understand the dangers of that stuff. Why? Public schools. They cram all that crap down kids' throughts by like age 10. Why is it that we can teach our kids about AIDS and condoms at age 10, and then forbid them to have sex for almost a whole decade?
Apparently, you had MUCH better sex ed than I did. Mine consisted of "condoms don't work."
Ever heard of The Education Of Shelby Knox? We went to the same high school.
Yes I'm offended, but no, it's not illogical. Look at me. I had sex early (age 14, just for the record) and yet:
1. No babies
2. No STD's
3. Only one partner (still my girlfriend 5 years later)
4. No psychological damage (to me OR my girl)
5. No sexed-based relationship (still founded on love; I made it clear even at age 14 sex can wait and she doesn't have to give me some to keep the relationship going.)
Now, you know, I think 5 years together is pretty darn good, considering most marriages don't even last that long anymore.
__________________
3. Only one partner (still my girlfriend 5 years later)
5. No sexed-based relationship (still founded on love; I made it clear even at age 14 sex can wait and she doesn't have to give me some to keep the relationship going.)
4. No psychological damage (to me OR my girl)
Mine consisted of the typical line-drawing diagrams of the reproductive system and learning the names of each element. And something about nocturnal emissions. It was ever so enlightening.
Apparently, you had MUCH better sex ed than I did. Mine consisted of "condoms don't work."
So what? All that proves is that the odds CAN be beaten and sex CAN be healthy early on.You are beating the odds though.
Relevance? :sarcastic In case you havn't read Dallas, we ARE still together. The "what ifs?" didn't happen to us, so if we can do it, other teens can. That's all im implying.Is not within your control.Thats not only your decision..That takes two.and at 14..the odds that both will stay committed long term are not very good.Im assuming she has not had any other partners either durign your relationship.And had she dumped you say at 14 and 1/2(which is a far more likely scenerio at that age) ..you most likely would have found another girl...and so on and so on..
You don't find it reasonable to be able to found a relationship on love and authentic compassion, and then have sex later on? Dallas, that is very hurtful. Do you want to know how we met? She suffers from chronic depression, and I was volunteering in a mental health outreach program (my mother is schizophernic, and I wanted to help the community.)I was doing a fund raising thing where we would buy hospitalized mental health patients get well gifts. I went to drop off her gift and I heard crying and crying and crying. She had been raped. I went in and, against my better judgement, offered my condolences. She was so surprised that a complete stranger was willing to sit down and just listen. Ever since that day, she has done a 180 degree recovery. So no, Dallas, our relationship WAS founded on love, and I find any doubt in this to be quite offensive and bigoted, as you are not me nor her.This you can only claim if she in fact didnt 'give you any all these years..or if she stopped giving you some now..
Sure I would have. But don't forget, I also would have learned a valueable lesson. Sometimes, there is value in experiencing pain and grief. This is life, Dallas, it's not some romantic la-la land where every day is bright and sunny.This again is not something you "controlled" on your own..If your girlfriend had jerked you around..say ..slept with your best friend..you would have been deeply hurt.(you said your relationship was love based).
Ah, so we just got lucky huh? Well I don't believe in luck. We took control of our destiny together, and don't you forget it.Ya''ll lucked out as I say
Thank you.It sounds as if you are a very good match.
Actually, my mom was schizophernic and in and out of institutions. My father was a hopeless, jobless drunk. Like I said, there is value in walking through life by yourself.Your parents raised ya'll well
Maybe one day you'll realize that every relationship is unique...but your relationship is "unique.
:biglaugh:I knew you atheists were sickos, but I just didn't know how much.
Apparently, you had MUCH better sex ed than I did. Mine consisted of "condoms don't work."
So what? All that proves is that the odds CAN be beaten and sex CAN be healthy early on.