I’m more interested in people’s core feelings regarding the subject of drug use, and what you think are the reasons behind the way you feel.
I am quite firmly in the anti-drug camp, with a vengeance, and having entered the inscription queue twice for emphasis. The very existence of psychoactives bothers me greatly. It takes the utmost effort for me to have respect for anyone that I know to be an user of anything from marijuana or alcohol up. Even tobacco is difficult at times. I actually have more respect for suicidal people.
I like to think that I feel so because to me there is no more precious thing than one's own mental balance. Wanting to intentionally upset it is quite absurd to my sensibilities.
Come to think of it, the existence of psychoactives and of people who want to use them is one of the reasons why I don't believe that there is a creator god. It seems obvious and intuitive to me that a creator god wouldn't allow that to be.
So for the sake of clarity, concern yourself with drugs that offer some form of mental altering effect, be it sensory, cognitive or emotional alteration. (So don’t focus on heart medication for example).
The question relates to the recreational use of such substances. I’d like to know if you are particularly anti-drug, pro drug, indifferent or perhaps relative in terms of what drug we are in fact talking about, or whether you are hypothetically talking about yourself or commenting on others that use.
I don't think I make any distinctions between myself and others in this regard. I find psychoactive drug use demeaning by definition. It is not a personal or relative thing far as I am concerned.
As health (ill)effects will naturally enter the discussion, I’d like you to acknowledge such reasons, but also think beyond them regarding the morality of use, imagining a situation where there are perhaps no negative health effects to justify a given position. (i.e. i want you to focus more on why the process of 'mental alteration' might be considered immoral or not )
I’d like to know why you hold the particular position you have, and whether you’re religious belief (or lack of) plays any role in your held position.
It is true that the five main precepts of Sila do advise against drug use, but this is more a matter of my chosing the faith by that criteria than of it convincing me.
It’s a subject that seems to have people holding fairly strong rigid views, and a subject I have my own thoughts on. Why would faculty altering capabilities be morally wrong in principle?
My gut feeling is that I must have misunderstood the question, quite frankly. It sounds like asking why red is considered a different color than blue.
Or rather, to whom would it really matter?
To anyone who wants to be respected as a sensible and sentient being, and to anyone who is connected in any significant way to any of those.
Which is to say, to everyone.
And as a bonus consideration, perhaps we can think about why people use such drugs in the first place?
Far as I can tell, to reach mental and corporal states that they enjoy, to find relief from certain unpleasant or just boring mental states, and as part of some kind of rituals of social bonding or of identity search.
Last edited: