-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
When you prevent an abortion...
- Thread starter KW
- Start date
Daemon Sophic
Avatar in flux
Nope. What you actually do is prevent a woman from cleaning the endometrial lining from her own uterus.
This will likely result in her seeking out a doctor in another more reasonably minded state. Assuming she cannot afford the travel and hotel involved, she will seek out a back-alley abortionist for the procedure. (As happened Every. Single. Day. Before Roe-v-Wade). Her chance of dying a lingering infectious and slow-bleed-out death goes WAY up.
So in the end, the fetus and endometrium are still removed from her body, and you’ve consigned the less financially well-off mothers to danger, suffering, and possible death.
Yay team anti-choice!!
This will likely result in her seeking out a doctor in another more reasonably minded state. Assuming she cannot afford the travel and hotel involved, she will seek out a back-alley abortionist for the procedure. (As happened Every. Single. Day. Before Roe-v-Wade). Her chance of dying a lingering infectious and slow-bleed-out death goes WAY up.
So in the end, the fetus and endometrium are still removed from her body, and you’ve consigned the less financially well-off mothers to danger, suffering, and possible death.
Yay team anti-choice!!
KW
Well-Known Member
If you save a person from drowning then they are later hit by a car, you still saved a human life.
Disagree
If you prevent a life saving abortion, you kill two people. One a fully fledged human being, someone’s daughter, sister or even potentially their mother and the other a potential human.
If you prevent a (for lack of a better term) regular abortion, you potentially allow a human birth. I say potentially, because the pregnant person could still have a miscarriage due to a myriad of reasons
KW
Well-Known Member
Agreed.
If you save them from drowning did you save a life?
If you save them from drowning and they live a full life did you save them?
If you cut them into pieces did you kill them?
KW
Well-Known Member
If you don't abort them they will breathe and live a life.
If you prevent an abortion you save a life.
KW
Well-Known Member
So the baby who is born and lives a full life because their abortion was prevented is not saved?
KW
Well-Known Member
KW
Well-Known Member
Misleading statements. This is a faulty and emotional approach that isn't accurate.
Try again to argue against abortion by being objective, and use facts. Be sure to explain the full depth of the consequences on the lives your views will affect, don't just ignore them as if they mean nothing to you.
Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Yes in general.
But also no at the same time.
Infanticide is a hideously brutal thing to happen to an unwanted newborn.
I'd rather see an undeveloped fetus aborted than hear of newborns thrown alive into dumpsters, garbage cans, trash compactors, flushed down toilets, and remote areas to be devoured by wildlife or starved and thirsted to death. Among others to horrible to mention.
That's a reason among several why although I'm pro life, I'm also pro choice.
I don't want to see that happen to newborns. It's better a fetus than newborn.
Surely.
But the secular State cannot prevent a woman from exercising a constitutional right.
It can dissuade her, saying that it will take care of that child.
But the secular State cannot prevent a woman from exercising a constitutional right.
It can dissuade her, saying that it will take care of that child.
